Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pffzl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T13:10:36.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Bayesian analysis and mechanistic theories in grounded cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2011

Lawrence W. Barsalou
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. barsalou@emory.edu http://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/barsalou/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grounded cognition offers a natural approach for integrating Bayesian accounts of optimality with mechanistic accounts of cognition, the brain, the body, the physical environment, and the social environment. The constructs of simulator and situated conceptualization illustrate how Bayesian priors and likelihoods arise naturally in grounded mechanisms to predict and control situated action.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2011 , pp. 191 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G. & Vinson, D. (2009) Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review 116:463–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1985) Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11:629–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1987) The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In: Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, ed. Neisser, U., pp. 101–40. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2003a) Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 358:1177–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2003b) Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18:513–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2005) Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:309–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008a) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008b) Grounding symbolic operations in the brain's modal systems. In: Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches, ed. Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R., pp. 9–42. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008c) Situating concepts. In: Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. Robbins, P. & Aydede, M., pp. 236–63. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2009) Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 364:1281–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Barbey, A. K., Simmons, W. K. & Santos, A. (2005) Embodiment in religious knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Culture 5:14–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C. & Smith, L. B. (2007) Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing 8:79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. & Ruppert, J. (2003) Social embodiment. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 43, ed. Ross, B., pp. 43–92. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D. (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: Symbols, embodiment, and meaning, ed. De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C., pp. 245–83. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M. M. & Connell, L. (2011) A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science 35:381–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. A., McRae, K. & Spivey, M. (2011) The mechanics of embodiment: A dialogue on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Cognition 2(5):1–21.Google Scholar
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K. & Barsalou, L. W. (2011) Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia 49:1105–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, W. & Barsalou, L. W. (2006) The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology 119:349–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed