Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T06:07:23.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three fallacies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Jonathan E. Adler
Jonathan E. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210 jadler@brooklyn.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three fallacies in the rationality debate obscure the possibility for reconciling the opposed camps. I focus on how these fallacies arise in the view that subjects interpret their task differently from the experimenters (owing to the influence of conversational expectations). The themes are: first, critical assessment must start from subjects' understanding; second, a modal fallacy; and third, fallacies of distribution.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 665 - 666
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable