Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-h2dfl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-10T02:24:26.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developmental structure in brainevolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Barbara L. Finlay
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Neurobiology and Behavior, Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 blf2@cornell.edu rbd1@cornell.edu nn12@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html www.psych.cornell.edu/darlington/index.htm
Richard B. Darlington
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Neurobiology and Behavior, Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 blf2@cornell.edu rbd1@cornell.edu nn12@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html www.psych.cornell.edu/darlington/index.htm
Nicholas Nicastro
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Neurobiology and Behavior, Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 blf2@cornell.edu rbd1@cornell.edu nn12@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/psychology/finlay/finlaylab.html www.psych.cornell.edu/darlington/index.htm

Abstract

How does evolution grow bigger brains? It has been widely assumedthat growth of individual structures and functional systems inresponse to niche-specific cognitive challenges is the mostplausible mechanism for brain expansion in mammals. Comparison ofmultiple regressions on allometric data for 131 mammalian species,however, suggests that for 9 of 11 brain structures taxonomic andbody size factors are less important than covariance of these majorstructures with each other. Which structure grows biggest is largelypredicted by a conserved order of neurogenesis that can be derivedfrom the basic axial structure of the developing brain. Thisconserved order of neurogenesis predicts the relative scaling notonly of gross brain regions like the isocortex or mesencephalon, butalso the level of detail of individual thalamic nuclei. Specialselection of particular areas for specific functions does occur, butit is a minor factor compared to the large-scale covariance of thewhole brain. The idea that enlarged isocortex could be a “spandrel,”a by-product of structural constraints later adapted for variousbehaviors, contrasts with approaches to selection of particularbrain regions for cognitively advanced uses, as is commonly assumedin the case of hominid brain evolution.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable