Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-lvxqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-12T19:50:20.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flaws in evolutionary theory andinterpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Robert O. Deaner
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–0383 rod1@acpub.duke.edu vschaik@acpub.duke.edu www.baa.duke.edu/Gradstnts/deaner.html
Carel P. van Schaik
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–0383 rod1@acpub.duke.edu vschaik@acpub.duke.edu www.baa.duke.edu/Gradstnts/deaner.html

Abstract

We make three points. First, even if Finlay et al.'s proposeddevelopmental mechanisms hold, there remains great scope forselection on specific brain structures. Second, the positivecovariance among the size of brain structures provides far lesssupport for the proposed developmental mechanisms than Finlay et al.acknowledge. Third, even if the proposed mechanisms are the primarysize determinants for most brain structures, these structures shouldnot be considered “spandrels.”

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable