Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-hwk5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-10T02:31:45.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mimetic dolphin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Gordon B. Bauer  and
Heidi E. Harley
Gordon B. Bauer
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, New College of the University of South Florida, Sarasota, FL 34243; Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236 bauer@sar.usf.edu harley@sar.usf.edu
Heidi E. Harley
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, New College of the University of South Florida, Sarasota, FL 34243; Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236 bauer@sar.usf.edu harley@sar.usf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rendell and Whitehead note the necessary, complementary relationshipbetween field and laboratory studies in other species, but concludetheir article by de-emphasizing the role of laboratory findings incetacean research. The ambiguity in field studies of cetaceansshould argue for greater reliance on the laboratory, which hasprovided much of the available research supporting the hypothesis ofcetacean culture.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 326 - 327
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable