Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-42qgm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:08:16.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptual-motor constraints on sound-to-meaning correspondence in language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Laura L. Namy  and
Lynne C. Nygaard
Laura L. Namy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. lnamy@emory.eduhttp://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/namy/index.htmllnygaar@emory.eduhttp://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/nygaard/index.html
Lynne C. Nygaard
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. lnamy@emory.eduhttp://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/namy/index.htmllnygaar@emory.eduhttp://www.psychology.emory.edu/cognition/nygaard/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proposal that language has evolved to conform to general cognitive and learning constraints inherent in the human brain calls for specification of these mechanisms. We propose that just as cognition appears to be grounded in cross-modal perceptual-motor capabilities, so too must language. Evidence for perceptual-motor grounding comes from non-arbitrary sound-to-meaning correspondences and their role in word learning.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 528 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergen, B. K. (2004) The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80:290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. (1994) Evidence for pervasive synaesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. In: Sound symbolism, ed. Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J., pp. 77–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. (1916/1959) Course in general linguistics, trans. Baskin, W., 1959 edition.Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Gasser, M. (2004) The origins of arbitrariness in language. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Forbus, K., Gentner, D. & Regier, T., pp. 434–39.Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A. (2000) Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43:379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S. (1998) The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1977) The view from language: Selected essays 1948–1974. The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, S. S. (1998) The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonesthemes. Doctoral dissertation. Emory University.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1947) Gestalt psychology, 2nd edition.Liveright.Google Scholar
Kunihira, S. (1971) Effects of the expressive voice on phonetic symbolism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10:427–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D., Pathman, T. & Mondloch, C. J. (2006) The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science 9:316–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCune, K. M. (1983) The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P. & Christiansen, M. H. (2006) Why form-meaning mappings are not entirely arbitrary in language. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Sun, R. & Miyake, N., pp. 1838–43. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2007) The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology 55:259–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuckolls, J. B. (1999) The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E. & Namy, L. L. (2008) Sound symbolism in word learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Sloutsky, V., Love, B. & McRae, K..Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S. & Namy, L. L. (in press) The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Rasmussen, S. & Namy, L. L. (in preparation) Cross-linguistic evidence for sound to meaning correspondence.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. & Hubbard, E. M. (2001) Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought, and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8:3–34.Google Scholar
Sasso, D. S., Namy, L. L. & Nygaard, L. C. (2005) Prosodic cues to word meaning. Paper presented at the 72nd Anniversary Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA; April, 2005.Google Scholar
Shintel, H., Nusbaum, H. C. & Okrent, A. (2006) Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language 55:167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, C. (2005) Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language 93:10–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed