Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T13:07:18.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between conscious phenomena and physical reality in behaviour control: The need for simplicity through phenomenological clarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Ralf-Peter Behrendt
Ralf-Peter Behrendt
Affiliation:
MRCPsych, The Retreat Hospital, York YO10 5BN, United Kingdom. rp.behrendt@btinternet.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can “predictive simulation” – as a conscious phenomenon, related to goal imagery – be interchangeable with mirroring, which is an automatic response that, from a first-person perspective, enters awareness only after the act? The correspondence between perception of another's action and execution of one's similar action may be an example of a general perception-motor interface that maps perception onto behaviour or disposition towards action, without the need for simulation.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 22 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Behrendt, R. P. (2005) Passivity phenomena: Implications for the concept of self. Neuro-Psychoanalysis 7:185–207.Google Scholar
Colby, C. L. & Goldberg, M. E. (1999) Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22:319–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsner, B. & Hommel, B. (2001) Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27:229–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, M. J. & Bargh, J. A. (2004) How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. J. (2004) Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grèzes, J. & Decety, J. (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 12:1–19.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology, vol. 1. Dover/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 2:661–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodworth, R. S. (1926) Psychology: A study of mental life, 6th edition.Methuen.Google Scholar