Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-lvrpm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-13T23:47:55.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tao of thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Deborah Frisch
Deborah Frisch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1227 dfrisch@oregon.uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I discuss several problems with Stanovich & West's research and suggest an alternative way to frame the rationality debate. The debate is about whether analytic (System 2) thinking is superior to intuitive (System 1) thinking or whether the two modes are complementary. I suggest that the System 1/System 2 distinction is equivalent to the Chinese concepts of yin and yang and that the two modes are complementary.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 672 - 673
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable