Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T14:17:42.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A PRACTICAL INSTRUMENT TO DOCUMENT THE PROCESS OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2001

David M. Tappin
Affiliation:
Glasgow University, U.K.
Caroline McKay
Affiliation:
Glasgow University, U.K.
Doreen McIntyre
Affiliation:
Greater Glasgow Health Board, U.K.
W. Harper Gilmour
Affiliation:
Glasgow University, U.K.
Stephanie Cowan
Affiliation:
Family Education Services, Christchurch, New Zealand
Fiona Crawford
Affiliation:
Greater Glasgow Health Board, U.K.
Fionnulagh Currie
Affiliation:
Glasgow University, U.K.
Mary Ann Lumsden
Affiliation:
Queen Mother's Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.

Abstract

Motivational interviewing is a client centred behavioural therapy foraddictive behaviours. It is an intervention designed to help all addicts,not just those ready to change. It is therefore suitable for use as anopportunistic intervention for clients whose main reason for contact maynot be their addiction. A pilot randomized controlled trial of home-basedmotivational interviewing by a specially trained midwife to help pregnantsmokers reduce their habit was performed in Glasgow from February 1997 toJanuary 1998. Did motivational interviewing take place? All 171 counsellinginterviews from 48 intervention clients were audio-taped. Forty-nineinterviews from 13 randomly selected clients were transcribed for contentanalysis. A rating scale established for feedback to trainee psychologistswas used by three experienced analysts. Thirty-two interviews were scoredindependently to validate the rating scale in this setting. More than 75% ofinterviews showed satisfactory motivational interviewing. Therapistutterances were motivational, and client responses included manyself-motivational statements. Few episodes of client resistance wererecorded. Rating took 160 mins per half hour interview. This instrumentprovided a valid measure of intervention quality for a randomizedcontrolled trial. It would not be practical to document process outsidea research environment.

Information

Type
Main Section
Copyright
© 2000 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.