Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T16:26:31.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association Between Low Vitamin D Levels, Sleep During Pregnancy and Post-Delivery, Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: Longitudinal Analysis of the NiPPeR Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Ciara McKay
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Sheila Barton
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
David Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Keith Godfrey
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Holly Austin
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Sleep is altered during pregnancy, particularly during the third trimester. Low Vitamin D levels have been linked to shorter sleep duration, depression and anxiety. In the NiPPeR double-blind randomised controlled trial of nutritional supplementation, women received either a formulation with additional ingredients including Vitamin D (‘intervention group’) or standard prenatal vitamins (‘control group’). The association between Vitamin D deficiency, sleep, depression and anxiety was examined from pre-conception to six months post-partum. We aimed primarily to determine if women deficient in Vitamin D (<50nmol/L) were more likely to have disordered sleep compared with those Vitamin D sufficient. A secondary aim was to examine if women deficient in Vitamin D were more likely to be depressed or anxious compared with those with adequate Vitamin D levels.

Methods: We examined sleep data from women with at least one measurement of Vitamin D in the pregnancy and post-delivery periods (n=515). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were compared between those with sufficient or deficient Vitamin D levels: by convention a PSQI score of >5 is considered to indicate disordered sleep. Depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS), with a score >13 indicating depression. The State-Trait Anxiety short form scale was used to measure anxiety, with a cut off >45 indicating state anxiety. One-way ANOVA in Stata version 18.0 was used throughout.

Results: As reported previously, the intervention substantially reduced the proportion of women who were Vitamin D deficient during pregnancy but did not change EPDS scores; PSQI scores were also not changed by the intervention. In the combined control and intervention group total PSQI scores increased from pre-conception until six weeks post-delivery. Total hours of sleep declined from pregnancy weeks 19–20 to six weeks post-delivery. At recruitment preconception, PSQI scores were higher in those deficient in Vitamin D, compared with those with sufficient levels (p=0.015); at later time-points PSQI scores were higher in Vitamin D deficient women but not significantly so. Depression as assessed by EPDS >13 was associated with Vitamin D deficiency only at preconception recruitment (p=0.019) and at 7 weeks’ gestation (p=0.004), but not later in pregnancy or post-delivery. There was no association found between anxiety and Vitamin D status.

Conclusion: At pre-conception, sleep was worse in women with low Vitamin D levels. At preconception and early in pregnancy, low Vitamin D levels were associated with depression. Intervention with a Vitamin D containing supplement did not improve sleep in pregnant women.

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.