Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T20:51:19.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clozapine and Risk of Haematological Malignancies: Insights from a Meta-Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Omar Kassar
Affiliation:
1Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt 2Medical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, Massachusetts, USA
Osama Hassan
Affiliation:
3Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom 4Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd
Affiliation:
5Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Muataz Kashbour
Affiliation:
6Dignostic Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Misrata, Libya
Omar Shaheen
Affiliation:
1Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Clozapine, the first and most effective atypical antipsychotic for schizophrenia, is typically reserved for treatment-resistant cases due to its serious adverse effects. Recent studies have linked clozapine to an increased risk of haematological malignancies (HM). This meta-analysis is the first to systematically investigate this association.

Methods: We performed this study in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Interventions. Eligible studies included involving patients treated with clozapine, regardless of the primary psychiatric diagnosis, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional that reported the association between clozapine use and the risk of haematological malignancies.

Results: Five studies were included in our meta-analysis (three retrospective cohorts and two case-control studies) involving a total of 211,427 patients. The overall odds of developing HM were significantly higher in the clozapine group compared with the control group (OR=2.1, 95% CI, 1.39–3.18, p=0.00005, I2=83%). Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and heterogeneity was resolved by exclusion of the study by Brainerd et al. The overall effect after its exclusion suggested a significant increase in the odds of HM (OR=2.45, 95% CI, 1.75–3.43, p< 0.00001, I²=48%). Subgroup analysis showed that the odds of developing leukaemia (OR=4.02, 95% CI, 2.22–7.27, p<0.00001), and lymphoma (OR=6.27, 95% CI, 2.83–13.9, p<0.00001) were significantly higher than the combined risk for all HM. There was no significant association between clozapine and HM with a cumulative dose of <999 defined daily doses (DDD) (OR=1.11, 95% CI, 0.85–1.46, p=0.44) or 1000–2999 DDD (OR=1.34, 95% CI, 0.76–2.34, p=0.31). However, for patients with a cumulative dose of 3000–4999 DDD and >5000 DDD, the risk of HM was significantly higher in the clozapine group (OR=2.04, 95% CI, 1.46–2.86, p<0.0001), (OR=2.45, 95% CI, 1.32–4.48, p=0.004), respectively. The association between clozapine and haematological malignancies became statistically significant after 5 years of follow-up (OR=2.32, 95% CI, 1.5–3.59, p=0.0002).

Conclusion: Despite the increased risk of HM, clozapine treatment in schizophrenia patients is associated with a significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality rate compared with other antipsychotic use. The small risk should not deter its use or not fuel “clozapine-phobia”. The clinical implication of our study is to raise awareness among the psychiatrists about this risk. Haematological abnormalities could be interpreted as typical adverse effects of clozapine, leading to diagnostic bias and delays in malignancy diagnosis.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.