Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T04:14:30.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competence and Confidence of Healthcare Professionals in Using Clozapine: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Agostina Secchi*
Affiliation:
Kent and Medway NHS Partnership Trust, Maidstone, United Kingdom. University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Clozapine is the only licensed medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia although it is underused. Healthcare providers’ (HCP) competence and confidence appear to have an effect on clozapine underutilisation. This review aims to synthesize the most pertinent literature examining the factors influencing HCP competence and confidence in the management of clozapine and how these factors influence variation in prescribing practice.

Methods: A review of the literature focusing on these elements was conducted. The Population, Context, Outcome (PCO) framework was adopted to support the literature search. The databases Medline, Psychinfo, Scopus, Cinahl, Pubmed, Embase, British Library, Ethos e-thesis, Google Scholar, Dart Europe e-thesis were consulted; the search was completed in January 2025. Screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by 2 researchers. Thematic analysis was used to investigate and compare the data emerging from the studies.

Results: Thirty-four articles were included in the review. Six themes were identified: attitude toward and knowledge about clozapine, misconceptions (regarding side effects, monitoring and co-morbidities), guidance, education, training and experience. Clinicians self-reported as competent with guidelines, yet they expressed less confidence in their ability to adhere to them and were uncertain about managing side effects. Lack of education, training and insufficient exposure to clozapine management were significant factors impacting competence and confidence resulting in clozapine underuse. Few studies involving non-medical professionals highlighted a general lack of education and training related to clozapine use.

Conclusion: Deficiencies in knowledge and experience were identified among professionals. However, the studies included in this review were lacking in the involvement of non-medical professionals. Given their crucial role in managing side effects and educating patients and carers, it is evident that their inclusion in future research is imperative.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.