Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T00:09:35.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the Utility of the Joint Geriatric and Psychiatry Complex Parkinson’s Clinic: A Service Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Tamara Chithiramohan
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Kate O’Kelly
Affiliation:
University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
Lucy Beishon
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
Ann Boyle
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Patients with Parkinson’s disease commonly have comorbid mental health conditions. There is a direct interplay between Parkinsonian and antipsychotic medication which can lead to difficult management decisions. Most mental health and Parkinsonian services are separate, with little coordination or communication between services. A multidisciplinary (MDT) clinic in Leicester was started two years ago to allow an MDT approach to the care of complex Parkinson’s patients. This is held by a geriatrician, an old age psychiatrist, and a Parkinson’s specialist nurse. The aim of this service evaluation was to formally evaluate the utility of the clinic.

Methods: We gathered quantitative information from the medical notes of patients seen between November 2023–May 2024, and qualitative information via interviews with carers and Community mental health team (CMHT) psychiatrists. Demographic data was gathered, as well as whether the patient was under a CMHT, whether there was a psychiatric component to appointment, and have we avoided hospital admission. Carers and CMHT consultants were asked about their experience of the clinic and whether the joint service was helpful for them.

Results: Notes of 23 patients were reviewed. Most had a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and were on two or more psychiatric medications (69.6%) and Parkinsonian medications (69.6%). 43.5% were already known to CMHT. Most had a clear psychiatric input to each consultation, such as medication change, cognitive assessment, or cancellation of CMHT appointment. The medical notes suggested 30.4% avoided CMHT referral and 17.4% may have avoided hospital admission. Six of the 23 patients had a reduction in carer strain.

CMHT consultants felt it was a useful addition which could lead to more timely care of patients. Both felt they were not confident in managing complex Parkinson’s patients or adjusting Parkinsonian medication and would have to refer to either geriatrics, neurology or Parkinson’s specialist nurses.

We interviewed three carers of patients. All were very happy with the care received, felt it was superior to the separate care they received before and felt they received more holistic and timely care. All felt it had reduced carer strain and prevented admission to hospital.

Conclusion: Carers and patients have benefited from the joint geriatrics, old age psychiatry Complex Parkinson’s clinic, compared with the separate care they were receiving before. Clinicians and carers feel it has allowed for efficient and holistic treatment of patients, avoided further appointments, avoided hospital admission in some cases and reduced carer strain.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.