Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7sgmh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T14:34:18.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Patients’ Sleep in an Acute Mental Health Ward Using Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Theodoros Mavrogiannidis
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Ghada Alshehabi
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Alessandro Malfatto
Affiliation:
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Interruption of sleep-wake behavioural patterns and circadian rhythms has been associated with the development and worsening of a range of mental health disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, and specific high-risk outcomes such as aggression and suicidality. In full knowledge of the above, we aimed to improve patients’ self-reported sleep quality in an acute male ward, by 20% by the end of January 2025.

Methods: An initial survey was conducted for patients to rate their sleep quality on a Numeric Rating Scale (1–10, where 1 = a worst night sleep and 10 = a best night sleep). This survey included close- and open-ended questions for patients to identify perceived barriers to good sleep. Responses were collected over one week from all consenting patients on the ward (10/18 patients). Insights from the survey were used to design targeted interventions addressing the key contributors to poor sleep. These interventions included: a) Offering earplugs to patients; b) Posters with QR codes for a free white noise app to mask disruptive noises; c) Sleep hygiene education through leaflets, with practical tips to improve sleep. A following survey was conducted after two weeks to measure the results of our interventions.

Results: Initial survey results included: a) 6/10 median sleep rating reported by our patients, pre-intervention; b) 5/10 of our patients reported their sleep to be disturbed by noise on the ward; c) none of our patients reported sleep to be disturbed by the temperature or lighting of the room; d) 2/10 reported psychiatric symptoms such as auditory hallucinations to disturb their sleep. Results after interventions included: a) all of our patients stated that they received the sleep hygiene booklet, were counselled about the tips, and saw the posters around the ward; b) 11/16 included in the post-intervention survey reported that they found the tips useful; c) 10/16 had used the earplugs and 7/10 of these had found them helpful; d) 1/16 downloaded and used the white noise app; e) 7/10 median sleep rating was reported post-intervention.

Conclusion: Non-pharmacological interventions such as earplugs and sleep hygiene education proved to be effective in improving patients’ quality of sleep. The development of a standardized protocol that includes these sleep-friendly practices has been implemented on the ward. Methods’ limitations such as baseline sleep medications and the complexity of contributing factors were taken into consideration.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.