Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-6lqsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T14:51:24.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating the Relationship Between Thalamic Volumes, Dementia Risk and Sleep in the PREVENT-Dementia Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Sita Shah
Affiliation:
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Axel Laurell
Affiliation:
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Maria-Eleni Dounavi
Affiliation:
1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Paresh Malhotra
Affiliation:
2Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Brian Lawlor
Affiliation:
3Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Sleep dysfunction is common in the prodromal stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Several thalamic nuclei are implicated in promoting and maintaining sleep. We investigated the relationship between thalamic nuclei volumes and sleep in people without dementia with respect to dementia family history (FHD) and apolipoprotein e4 allele (APOE4) carriership.

Methods: 700 participants aged 40–59 years were recruited into the PREVENT Dementia study. 645 participants underwent T1-weighted 3T MRI scans. The thalamus was segmented into six regions; 1) anterior, 2) lateral, 3) ventral, 4)intralaminar, 5) medial and 6) posterior using Freesurfer 7.1.0 and underwent ComBAT harmonisation. Subjective sleep data was assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, which quantifies sleep using seven components and a total score. 586 participants were included for analysis with respect to FHD and 590 for APOE4 carriership. Logistic regression or robust linear regression with age, sex, total intracranial volume and depression as covariates and false discovery rate correction (FDR) for multiple comparisons was used.

Results: Smaller volumes of the whole thalamus (p=0.0391), posterior region (pFDR=0.042), and within the posterior region the lateral geniculate (pFDR=0.019), and pulvinar anterior (pFDR=0.019) and medial nuclei (pFDR=0.019), were associated with worse perceived quality of sleep in the FHD positive group. Smaller volumes of the thalamus (p=0.041) in the FHD positive group were associated with greater sleep disturbances. We did not find any relationship between thalamic volumes and FHD in predicting total scores, sleep duration, latency, efficiency, use of medications to aid sleep or daytime dysfunction.

However, larger thalamic volumes were associated with a significantly lower total Pittsburgh score, indicating less overall sleep dysfunction (p=0.014) in non-carriers. A similar trend was seen with the lateral, ventral and intralaminar subregions, but they did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. We did not find any association between thalamic volumes and APOE4 carriership in predicting sleep quality, duration, latency, efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medications or daytime dysfunction.

Conclusion: Our results suggest some early sleep changes related to thalamic volume, particularly in individuals with dementia family history. It is possible the thalamus and nuclei within the posterior thalamus may exert beneficial effects in preserving the quality of sleep in this group.

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Additional authors include Dr Lorina Naci, Dr Ivan Koychev, Dr Craig W Ritchie, Dr Yves Dauvilliers, Prof John T O’Brien

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.