Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7sgmh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T14:58:05.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Menopause and Depressive Symptoms in the UK Biobank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Hira Mayet
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Katie Marwick
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Magdalena Pfaff
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
James M Stone
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: The UK Biobank is a large-scale prospective cohort study with data collected on over 500,000 individuals within the United Kingdom. We sought to understand whether the years around the menopause are associated with an increased likelihood of depressive symptoms, using the PHQ-2 questionnaire, which screens for depressive disorders. A score of 3 or above is suggestive of a depressive disorder. Our analysis looked at the likelihood of having significant depressive symptoms in the years before and after the final menstrual period.

Methods: Exclusion criteria included male participants, participants who had bilateral oophorectomies, those who were unsure of when their FMP was due to having a hysterectomy, those whose age at final menstrual period was under 40 or preferred not to say, and those whose reported age at final menstrual period differed by >2 years when asked on different occasions. Participants who did not give an answer to either of the two screening questions were also excluded.

The PHQ-2 enquires about depressive mood and anhedonia over the prior two weeks at baseline assessment. Possible answers were not at all, several days, more than half the days, and nearly every day. Using logistic regression, odds ratios were calculated for likelihood of having a PHQ-2 score above 3 from 9 years prior to the final menstrual period to 9 years after, compared with the year of the final menstrual period.

Results: In females undergoing natural menopause (n=143,685) those assessed who were within a year of their final menstrual period had the highest rate of depressive symptoms. 7.6% of women within a year of their final menstrual period had a PHQ-2 score of 3 or more. Depressive symptoms at all other timepoints were less frequent, ranging from 3.9% to 7.1%, with the OR compared with year of final menstrual period ranging between 0.49 to 0.93. In the 2 years either side of the final menstrual period, depressive symptoms were not significantly lower than the year of the final menstrual period, particularly at 2 years prior (6.0%, OR 0.77 (95% CI (0.58, 1.02)), one year post (6.9%, OR 0.90 (95% CI (0.78, 1.05)) and 2 years post (7.1%, OR 0.93 (95% CI (0.80, 1.08)).

Conclusion: These results suggest that the proportion of women experiencing significant depressive symptoms increases in the years around the final menstrual period. There is an increased likelihood of significant depressive symptoms in the year of the final menstrual period compared with surrounding years.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.