Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-6lqsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T07:07:51.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shaping Minds, Changing Attitudes: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Different Teaching Interventions Regarding Attitudes and Knowledge Towards Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Within Pre-Registration Healthcare Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Jasleen Deol
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Naduni Jayasinghe
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
Anna Walters
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Sanat Kulkarni
Affiliation:
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment modality used to manage a variety of different psychiatric conditions including treatment-resistant schizophrenia, depression and catatonia. Different teaching methods have been employed by educational institutions to teach healthcare students about ECT, however synthesis of this evidence is lacking. Several sources cite that there is negative stigma and attitudes towards ECT amongst Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). Teaching within undergraduate curricula may improve knowledge surrounding ECT, further reducing negative associations.

Methods: Using pre-determined search terms, a large language model was used to screen relevant databases (including ERIC and CINAHL), identifying 5,550 studies, 453 of which were duplications, leading to a total of 5,097 relevant studies. Pre-agreed strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and 19 studies were identified suitable for inclusion. Another 14 studies were reviewed again due to conflicting views, of which 7 were deemed suitable, totalling 26 relevant studies for inclusion. These texts were analysed in their entirety. Both qualitative and quantitative data was gathered, and this was heterogenous in nature. Qualitative data was thematically analysed.

Results: Diverse teaching techniques and interventions were identified, and these were successful to varying degrees. These interventions included: the development and creation of new educational modules centred around ECT; real time ECT demonstrations; teaching sessions paired with specialised technology enhanced learning interventions hosted remotely by consultant psychiatrists. A plethora of different interventions centred around improving knowledge of ECT amongst healthcare students varied in creativity, and even included a Hollywood depiction of ECT.

Educational interventions focusing on the improvement of students’ experience whilst on psychiatric placements correlated with a global positive improvement in knowledge levels regarding ECT. Video-based educational interventions were well received by students, and an improvement in attitude and knowledge regarding ECT was noted. Passive interventions, including didactic based teaching interventions described a notable positive shift in attitudes amongst students regarding ECT. However, some studies reported that the longevity of this improvement in knowledge and attitudes may be short-lived, affecting its translation to future medical practice.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the need to improve education of ECT amongst healthcare students, to ensure that future clinicians are well equipped with relevant knowledge concerning this important treatment modality. Ultimately interventions that strive to improve knowledge of ECT and induce positive experiences with students, helps to reshape attitudes towards this treatment modality and future clinical practice.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.