Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7mr9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T07:23:47.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dietary effect of windbreak pollens on longevity and fecundity of a predacious mite Euseius addoensis addoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) found in citrus orchards in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T.G. Grout  and
R.I. Richards
T.G. Grout*
Affiliation:
South African Co-operative Citrus Exchange, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
R.I. Richards
Affiliation:
South African Co-operative Citrus Exchange, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
*
Dr T.G. Grout, Outspan Citrus Centre. P.O. Box 28, Nelspruit, South Africa 1200.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The predacious mite Euseius addoensis addoensis (McMurtry) is an important predator of citrus thrips, Scirtothrips aurantii Faure, and Tetranychid mites on citrus in the eastern Cape Province of South Africa. It can also survive and reproduce on certain pollens. In this study, pollen collected from windbreaks commonly used around citrus orchards, was compared with that from Carpobrotus muirii (Mesembryanthemaceae) as a food source for predacious mites. Bioassays were conducted in the laboratory using a leaf-disk technique and both mite mortality and fecundity were recorded through one generation. Casuarina cunninghamiana (Casuarinaceae) was the only windbreak tested that produced pollen capable of sustaining E. a. addoensis for a generation with fecundity similar to that obtained with Carpobrotus muirii. Pollens collected from Pinus radiata (Pinaceae), Cupressus arizonica, C. goveniana and C. torulosa (Cupressaceae) were unsuitable. Casuarina spp. windbreaks may therefore help to maintain predacious mite populations during autumn when natural sources of prey are diminishing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 317 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Green, G.C. (1968) Windbreaks for citrus orchards. Farming in South Africa 44, 9; 11; 13; 15.Google Scholar
Grout, T.G. & Richards, G.I. (1990) The influence of windbreak species on citrus thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) populations and their damage to South African citrus orchards. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 53, 151–157.Google Scholar
Grout, T.G. & Richards, G.I. (1991) Research report for the period September 1990 to August 1991. 46 pp. Entomology Section, Citrus Exchange, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.Google Scholar
Kamburov, S.S. (1991) Damage to fruit and the impact on crop set from late infestations of citrus thrips (Scirtothrips aurantii). Citrus Journal 1, 33–34.Google Scholar
Keetch, D.P. (1972) Ecology of the citrus red mite, Panonychus citri (McGregor), (Acarina: Tetranychidae) in South Africa. 3. The influence of the predacious mite, Amblyseius (Typhlo-dromalus) addoensis van der Merwe & Ryke. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 35, 69–79.Google Scholar
McMurtry, J.A. (1980) Biosystematics of three taxa in the Amblyseius finlandicus group from South Africa, with comparative life history studies (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 6, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurtry, J.A. (1983) Phytoseiid mites from Guatemala, with descriptions of two new species and redefinitions of the genera Euseius, Typhloseiopsis, and the Typhlodromus occidentalis species-group (Acari: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Entomology 25, 249–272.Google Scholar
Wentzel, P.C., Georgala, M.B. & Bedford, E.C.G. (1978) Citrus thrips Scirtothrips aurantii Faure, pp. 137–141in Bedford, E.C.G. (Ed.) Citrus pests in the Republic of South Africa. Science Bulletin Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Republic of South Africa No. 391.Google Scholar