Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-6knnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T17:23:53.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory experiments on the disruption of mating in the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by excesses of female pheromones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. E. Ellis ,
L. C. Brimacombe ,
L. J. Mcveigh  and
A. Dignan
P. E. Ellis
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wright's Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
L. C. Brimacombe
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wright's Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
L. J. Mcveigh
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wright's Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
A. Dignan
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wright's Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The courtship of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) was studied in closed cages containing an excess of the female sex pheromones (Z,E)-9, 11-tetradecadienly acetate (III) or (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (IIA). High levels of III or IIA were obtained by using polyethylene vials loaded with 5, 1 or 0·1 mg of pheromone. Vials containing 10 or 1 μg released low levels of pheromone. Excess pheromone reduced mating; at high levels of III and IIA, only 15% and 42% of pairs, respectively, mated, compared with 92% of control pairs. Some 45% of courtships in control cages did not end in copulation, and in half of these the female rejected the male by giving a rapid flick of the wings. A detailed examination of unsuccessful courtships showed that an excess of III or IIA disrupted female courtship behaviour. At the higher levels of pheromone, no female wing-lifted to show acceptance of the male and only a few rejected the male by wing-flicking. Significantly more females took to flight in cages containing III, whilst in cages with IIA females either took to flight or remained still. These changes in behaviour were still apparent in courtships where the female was calling and the male gave a full brush display. It is suggested that both III and IIA block olfactory reception of the male brush pheromone. An excess of either pheromone increased the proportion of male courtships of non-calling females. IIA had no other appreciable effect on male behaviour, but III also significantly reduced full brush displays during courtship, increased the period of flight preceding hovering and increased partial brush extension during flights that did not lead to courtship.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 673 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartell, R. J. & Shorey, H. H. (1969). Pheromone concentrations required to elicit successive steps in the mating sequence of males of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62, 1206–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beevor, P. S. & Campion, D. G. (1979). The field use of ‘inhibitory’ components of lepidopterous sex pheromones and pheromone mimics.—pp. 313–325 in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.). Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals.—427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. A., Schwalbe, C. P., Beroza, M. & Knipling, E. F. (1974). Disruption of gypsy moth mating with microencapsulated disparlure.—Science, N.Y. 183, 972–973.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W., Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Lestor, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1974). Field studies of the female sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Cyprus.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 89–96.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Mcveigh, L. J., Murlis, J., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., Nesbitt, B. F. & Marrs, G. J. (1976). Communication disruption of adult Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Crete using synthetic pheromones applied by microencapsulation and dispenser techniques.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 335–344.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Lester, R. & Nesbitt, B. F. (1978). Controlled release of pheromones.—Pestic. Sci. 9, 434–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G., Hunter-Jones, P., Mcveigh, L. J., Hall, D. R., Lester, R. & Nesbitt, B. F. (1980). Modification of the attractiveness of the primary pheromone component of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by secondary pheromone components and related chemicals.—Bull. ent. Res. 70, 417–434.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Mcveigh, L. J., Hunter-Jones, P., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., Nesbitt, F., Marrs, G. J. & Alder, M. R. (in press). Evaluation of microencapsulated formulations of pheromone components of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Crete.—in Kydonias & Beroza (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals, 03 24–28, 1980, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T., Baker, T. C. & Roelofs, W. L. (1975). Behavioural role of individual components of a multichemical attractant system in the oriental fruit moth.—Nature, Lond. 253, 348–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardé, R. T., Roelofs, W. L. & Doane, C. C. (1973). Natural inhibitor of the gypsy moth sex attractant.—Nature, Lond. 241, 474–475.Google Scholar
Charmillot, P. J. (1978). Reduction of codling moth catches (Laspeyresia pomonella L.) by inhibition of males following diffusion of synthetic sex attractant in the orchard.—Mitt. Schweiz. ent. Ges. 51, 5–12.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. E. & Brimacombe, L. C. (in press). The mating behaviour of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.).—Anim. Behav.Google Scholar
Farkas, S. R., Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. (1974). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. The use of widely separated evaporators of looplure for the disruption of pheromone communication in Trichoplusia ni.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 876–877.Google Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 a). Female sex pheromone release and the timing of male flight in the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), measured by pheromone traps.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 b). Field studies with the synthetic sex pheromone and inhibitor of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 243–265.Google Scholar
Murlis, J. & Bettany, B. W. (1977). Night flight towards a sex pheromone source by male Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Nature. Lond. 268, 433–435.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R. A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973). Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths.—Nature, New Biol. 244, 208–209.Google Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Seabrook, W. D. & Ross, R. J. (1979). Precopulatory behavior of males and perception of a potential male pheromone in spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 72, 544–551.Google Scholar
Persoons, C. J., Voerman, S., Verwiel, P. E. J., Ritter, F. J., Nooyen, W. J. & Minks, A. K. (1976). Sex pheromone of the potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella: isolation, identification and field evaluation.—Entomologia exp. appl. 20, 289–300.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K. & Fukuto, T. R. (1964). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. I. A quantitative bioassay for the sex pheromone of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)..—J. econ. Ent. 57, 252–254.Google Scholar
Sower, L. L., Vick, K. W. & Ball, K. A. (1974). Perception of olfactory stimuli that inhibit the responses of male phycitid moths to sex pheromones.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L., Turner, W. K. & Fish, J. C.. (1975). Population-density-dependent mating frequency among Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) in the presence of synthetic sex pheromone with behavioral observations.—J. Chem. Ecol. 1, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D. L. & Jacobson, L. A.. (1970). A sex pheromone in the red-backed cutworm.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 841–844.Google Scholar