Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-57n77 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-16T12:36:47.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability of vigour between colonies of Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and its implications for laboratory experimentation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Lenz
M. Lenz
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Entomology, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Groups of Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) originating from six colonies, three taken from each of two widely separated localities in northern Australia (Townsville and Darwin), were kept at population densities of 0·005, 0·001 or 0·020 g termites/ml. Survival and wood consumption of the groups after eight weeks followed a similar pattern in the colonies from both collection areas. Groups exhibited least vigour at the lowest population density, most vigour at the middle density and slightly less than maximum vigour at the highest density. However, the actual values for survival and wood consumption varied widely between colonies, irrespective of their origin. The implications of these and related results for laboratory experiments which rely on survival and wood consumption as indicators of termite vigour are discussed.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon (1982). Holzschutzmittel. Bestimmung der Grenze der Wirksamkeit gegenüber Reticulitermes santonensis de Feytaud. Laboratoriumsverfahren—9 pp. Berlin, Beuth Verlag (EN 117, Deut. Fassung).Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1970 a). Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Ökologie einiger Reticulitermes-Arten (Ins., Isopt.).—Z. angew. Ent. 65, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1970 b). Reticulitermes (Ins., Isopt.) in Mittel- und West-Europa.—Z. angew. Ent. 65, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1973). Aktivitätsschwankungen bei Termiten, em Phänomen von grundsätzlicher biologischer Bedeutung.—Z. angew. Ent. 72, 273–290.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976). Influences of magnetic, electric, and gravity fields on termite activity.—Mater. & Org. suppl. 3, 407–418.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1979). Einfluss von elektrischen Feldern in Thermostaten und magnetischen Feldern in Klimaräumen auf Termiten.—Z. angew. Zool. 66, 463–474.Google Scholar
Carter, F. L., Stringer, C. A. & Smythe, R. V. (1972). Survival of six colonies of Reticulitermes flavipes on unfavorable woods.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 984–985.Google Scholar
Collins, N. M. (1981). Consumption of wood by artificially isolated colonies of the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes bellicosus.—Entomologia exp. appl. 29, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esenther, G. R. (1977). Fluctuation of survival, growth and differentiation in biweekly samples of Reticulitermes flavipes workers.—Mater. & Org. 12, 49–58.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J., Greaves, T., Holdaway, F. G. & Wetherly, A. H. (1955). Standard laboratory colonies of termites for evaluating the resistance of timber, timber preservatives, and other materials to termite attack.—Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. no. 277, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Howick, C. D. & Creffield, J. W. (1983). Intraspecific variability in feeding capacity of Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).—6 pp. Stockholm, Int. Res. Grp Wood Preserv. (Doc. No.: IRG/WP/1175).Google Scholar
Lenz, M., Barrett, R. A. & Williams, E. R. (1984). Implications for comparability of laboratory experiments revealed in studies on the effects of population density on vigour in Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) and Nasutitermes exitiosus (Hill) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae & Termitidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 74, 477–485.Google Scholar
Lenz, M. & Williams, E. R. (1980). Influence of container, matrix volume and group size on survival and feeding activity in species of Coptotermes and Nasutitermes (Isoptera: Rhinoter mitidae, Termitidae).—Mater. & Org. 15, 25–46.Google Scholar
Nakajima, S., Shimizu, K. & Nakajima, Y. (1964). Analytical studies on the vitality of colonies of the Formosan termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. II. Seasonal fluctuations on the external characters of the workers, the ratio of caste-member and carbon dioxide in the nest of a colony.—Bull. Fac. Agric. Miyazaki Univ. 9, 222–227.Google Scholar
Scheffe, H. (1959). The analysis of variance.—New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. (1962). Analytical studies on the vitality of colonies of the Formosan termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. I. Analysis of the strength of vitality.—Bull. Fac. Agric. Miyazaki Univ. 8, 106–110.Google Scholar
Su, N. Y. & La Fage, J.P. (1984). Differences in survival and feeding activity among colonies of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera. Rhinotermitidae).—Z. angew. Ent. 97, 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar