Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T19:59:40.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STATISTICAL DIFFICULTIES IN THE ANALYSIS OF PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE DATA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Todd P. Livdahl  and
Alan E. Stiven
Todd P. Livdahl
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610
Alan E. Stiven
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The utility of the ‘random predator equation’ of Royama (1971) and Rogers (1972) as a summary of the functional response relationship between predatory feeding behavior and prey density is questioned on the grounds that statistical assumptions in the regression analysis are not met by the linearized form of the equation. The absence of an alternative linearization that does not violate these assumptions necessitates the use of Holling's (1959) disc equation for the description of experimentally derived functional response relationships, when the comparison of parameters of different populations of predator or prey is a more important objective than a precise estimation.

The statistical validity of the traditional linearization of the disc equation is questioned. An alternative transformation is proposed, which removes the statistical problems associated with the former transformation, and which permits a higher degree of explanation of variance in the independent variable by the regression.

Résumé

L'utilité de l'équation du "random predator" (prédateur recherchant sa proie au hasard) de Royama (1971) et Rogers (1972), pour représenter la relation entre la réponse fonctionnelle caractérisant le comportement alimentaire d'un prédateur et la densité de sa proie est remise en question parce que les prémices statistiques de l'analyse de régression ne sont pas satisfaites par la forme linéarisée de l'équation. L'absence d'une forme de linéarisation qui ne viole pas ces conditions oblige à l'emploi de l'équation ("disc equation") de Holling (1959) pour décrire les réponses fonctionnelles obtenues expérimentalement lorsque la comparaison des paramètres entre populations différentes est plus importante que leur estimation précise.

La validité de la méthode habituelle de linéarisation de l'équation "disc" est remise en question. Une autre transformation est proposée laquelle ne présente pas les problèmes statistiques de la première, et qui permet d'expliquer une part plus grande de la variance de la variable indépendante par la régression.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 10 , October 1983 , pp. 1365 - 1370
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Burnett, T. 1951. Effects of temperature and host density on the rate of increase of a parasite. Am. Nat. 83: 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, L. R. 1963. The influence of predation by Syrphus sp. on the numbers of Cardiaspina albitextura (Psyllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 11: 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveleigh, E. S. and Chant, D. A.. 1981 a. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey systems: effects of predator age and feeding history on prey consumption and the functional response (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 59: 1387–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveleigh, E. S. and Chant, D. A.. 1981 b. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: the numerical response of immature and adult predators (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 59: 1407–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveleigh, E. S. and Chant, D. A.. 1981 c. The feeding and searching behavior of two species of phytoseiid mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius degenerans (Berlese), at different prey densities (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 59: 1419–1430.Google Scholar
Fox, L. R. and Murdoch, W. W.. 1978. Effects of feeding history on short-term and long-term functional responses in Notonecta hoffmanni. J. Animal Ecol. 47: 945–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, K. J. 1969. The importance of coincidence in the functional and numerical responses of two parasites of the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer. Can. Ent. 101: 785–818.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.Google ScholarPubMed
Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H., and Beddington, J. R.. 1976. The components of arthropod predation. I. The prey death rate. J. Animal Ecol. 45: 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H., and Beddington, J. R.. 1977. Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 249–262.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 91: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 45. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Livdahl, T. 1979. Evolution of handling time: the functional response of a predator to the density of sympatric and allopatric strains of prey. Evolution 33: 765–768.Google Scholar
McQueen, D. J. 1969. Reduction of zooplankton standing stocks by predaceous Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi in Marion Lake, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1605–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, P. S. 1968. Bioclimatic studies of the aphid parasite Praon exsoletum. I. Effects of temperature on the functional response of females to varying host densities. Can. Ent. 100: 728–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. and Oaten, A.. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. ecol. Res. 9: 2–131.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. 1972. Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 369–383.Google Scholar
Royama, T. 1971. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. Suppl. 1. 91 pp.Google Scholar
Takahashi, F. 1968. Functional response to host density in a parasitic wasp, with reference to population regulation. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 10: 54–68.Google Scholar