Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:55:19.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks on Martin's Axiom and the Continuum Hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Stevo Todorcevic
Stevo Todorcevic*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, Knez Mihailova 35, 11000 Beograd, Yugoslavia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Martin's axiom and the Continuum Hypothesis are studied here using the notion of a ccc partition i.e., a partition of the form where K0 has the following properties:

(a) K0 contains subsets of its elements as well as all singletons of X.

(b) Every uncountable subset of K0 contains two elements whose union is in K0.

Keywords

03E0503E5004A20

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , 01 August 1991 , pp. 832 - 851
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1991

References

0. Baumgartner, J.E. and Taylor, A.D., Saturation Properties of Ideals in Generic Extensions H, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 271(1982), 587–609.Google Scholar
1. Comfort, W.W. and Negrepontis, S., Chain Conditions in Topology. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Devlin, K.J., Some weak versions of large cardinal axioms, Ann. Math. Logic 5(1973), 291–325.Google Scholar
3. van Douwen, E.K. and Fleissner, W.G., Definable fore ing axiom: an alternative to Martin's axiom, Topology and its Appl. 35(1990), 277–289.Google Scholar
4. Fremlin, D.H., Consequences of Martin's axiom. Cambridge University press, 1984.Google Scholar
5. Harrington, L. and Shelah, S., Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 26(1985), 178–188.Google Scholar
6. Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory. Higher Set Theory (Miiller, G.H. and Scott, D.S. eds.) Lecture Notes in Math. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1978.Google Scholar
7. Kanamori, A., Partition relations for successor cardinals, Advances in Math. 59(1986), 152–169.Google Scholar
8. Knaster, B., Sur une propriété characteristique de l'ensemble des nombres réels, Mat. Sbornik 16(1945), 281–288.Google Scholar
9. Knaster, B. and Szpilrajn, E., Problem 192. May 1941, The Scottish Book.Google Scholar
10. Koppelberg, S., General Theory of Boolean Algebras. Vol 1 of Handbook of Boolean algebras (J.D. Monk éd.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar
11. Marczewski, E., Séparabilité et multiplication cartésienne des espaces topologiques, Fund. Math. 34(1947), 127–143.Google Scholar
12. Martin, D.A. and Solovay, R.M., Internai Cohen extensions, Ann. Math. Logic 2(1970), 143–178.Google Scholar
13. Merrill, J.W.L., UFA fails in the Bell-Kunen model, J. Symbolic Logic 55(1990), 284–296.Google Scholar
14. Miller, A.W. and Prikry, K., When the continuum has confinality ω1 , Pacific J. Math. 115(1984), 399–407.Google Scholar
15. Roitman, J., A very thin superatomic Boolean algebra, Algebra Universalis 21(1985), 137–142.Google Scholar
16. Shanin, N.A., On intersection of open subsets in the product of topological spaces, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. 53(1946), 449–501.Google Scholar
17. Shoenfield, J.R., The problem of pre die ativity. Esays on the Foundations of Mathematics, The Mages Press, Jerusalem, 1961,132–142.Google Scholar
18. Solovay, R.M., A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesque measurable, Ann. Math. 92(1970), 1–56.Google Scholar
19. Todorcevie, S., Remarks on cellularity in products, Compositio Math. 57(1986), 357–372.Google Scholar
20. Todorcevie, S. Partitioning pairs of countable ordinals, Acta Mathematica 159(1987), 261–294.Google Scholar
21. Todorcevie, S. Partition Problems in Topology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1989.Google Scholar
22. Todorcevic, S. and Velickovic, B., Martin's axiom and partitions, Compositio Math. 63(1987), 391–408.Google Scholar