Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:08:41.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Robert C. Pianta ,
Michael S. Steinberg  and
Kristin B. Rollins
Robert C. Pianta*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Michael S. Steinberg
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Kristin B. Rollins
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
*
Robert C. Pianta, 147 Ruffner Hall, 405 Emmet St., Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Teacher reports of children's competence and problem behaviors are an important source of information on psychopathology. The school context is also an agent of developmental change. This study examines teacherchild relationships and deflections in child adjustment over the school-entry to grade 2 period in 436 children. The Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS) was related to two indices of deflections in predicted child adjustment: (a) residual scores obtained from regressing teacher reports from grade 1 on kindergarten teacher reports, and (b) false positive predictions of retention or referral for special education in the K-l period.

Children with whom kindergarten teachers reported a positive relationship were rated in spring of grade I as better adjusted than was predicted on the basis of identical ratings from the fall of the kindergarten year; the converse was also true. False-positive retention/referral predictions had more positive relationships with kindergarten teachers than did true positives. A second set of analyses examined second grade teacher ratings of child adjustment and child-teacher relationships in two groups of children with different child-teacher relationship histories in kindergarten. Children with warm, close, communicative relationships with kindergarten teachers were better adjusted and had more positive child-teacher relationships in second grade than those with angry, dependent child-teacher relationships in kindergarten. Results supported the view that children's relationships with teachers are an important component of adaptation in school, and that they can play a role in deflecting the course of development in the school context.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 295 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. M., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1988). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53 (2, Serial No. 218).Google Scholar
Barkely, R. (1987). Defiant children: A clinician's manual for parent training. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1989, April). Attachment: The parental perspective. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City MO.Google Scholar
Caldwell, C. B., & Pianta, R. C. (1991). Development of a measure of young childrens' problem and competence behaviors: The Early School Behavior Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Denham, S. A., & Burton, R. (1995). A socialemotional intervention program for at risk fouryear-olds. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Elicker, J., Englund, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Predicting peer competence and peer relationships childhood from early parent-child relationships. In Parke, R. & Ladd, G. (Eds.), Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage (pp. 77–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1981). Academic expectations and the school attainment of young children. Sociology of Education, 54, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluharty, N. (1978). Fluharty preschool speech and language screening test. Boston: Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
Furman, W. (1984). Some observations on the study personal relationships. In Masters, J. C. & Yarkin-Levin, K. (Eds.), Boundary areas in social and developmental psychology (pp. 15–42). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. (1978). Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, C., & Howes, C. (1992). Contextual constraints on the concordance of mother-child and teacher-child relationships. In Pianta, R. (Ed.), Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children's lives (pp. 41–60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1986). Four factors in the mediation of teacher expectancy effects. In Feldman, S. (Ed.), The social psychology of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1982). Comparisons alternative models of the relationships between academic achievement and children's perceptions of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In Nicholls, J. (Ed,), The development achievement-related cognitions and behaviors. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinnell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C. A. (1986). The Teacher-Child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children's school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C. C. (1994a). Childrens' relationships with peers: Differential associations with aspects of the teacherchild teacherchild relationship. Child Development, 65, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, C., Matheson, C. C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1994b). Maternal, teacher, and child care history correlates of childrens' relationships with peers. Child Development, 65, 264–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irvine, J. J. (1986). Teacher-student interactions: Effect of student race, sex, and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, J. M., Pullen, P. L., & Akers, E. (1986). Classroom management: Teacher-child-peer relationships. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1992). Maltreated children's reports of relatedness to their teachers. In Pianta, R. (Ed.), Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children's lives (pp. 81–108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1991). Manual for classification of the Adult Attachment Interview. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley CA.Google Scholar
Mash, E., & Terdal, L. (1988). Behavioral assessment of childhood disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. (1972). Manual for McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
McCoy, S. J. (1993). The first day of school: The predictive utility of a kindergarten screening procedure. Unpublished dissertation. University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Olson, P. H. (1977). Insiders' and outsiders' views relationships: Research studies. In Levinger, G. & Raush, H. L. (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Pallas, A. M., Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Cadigan, D. (1987). Children who do exceptionally well in first grade. Sociology of Education, 60, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, E., Faucher, T. A., & Eaton, W. W. (1978). A new perspective on the effects of first-grade teachers on children's subsequent adult status. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, R. C. (1992a). Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in childrens' lives. New Directions in Child Development, Vol. 57. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pianta, R. C. (1992b). The Student-Teacher Relationship Scale. University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Pianta, R. C. (1994). Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, R. C., & Nimetz, S. L. (1991). Relationships between teachers and children: Associations with behavior at home and in the classroom. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianta, R. C., & Nimetz, S. L. (1994). Parent-child and teacher-child relationships in preschool. Manuscript in preparation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saft, E. W. (1994). A descriptive study of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale with preschoolers. Unpublished dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaptation in preschool: The roots maladaptation and competence. In Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 16. (pp. 41–83). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Guide for administering and scoring the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Chicago, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Tramontana, M. G., Hooper, S. R., & Selzer, S. C. (1988). Research on the prediction of later academic achievement: A review. Developmental Review, 8, 89–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trickett, P. K., McBride-Chang, C., & Putnam, F. W. (1994). The classroom performance and behavior of sexually abused females. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troy, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1990). Victimization among preschoolers: The role of attachment relationship history. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 44, 306–318.Google Scholar
van Ijzendoorn, M., Sagi, A., & Lambermon, M. (1992). The multiple caretaker paradox: Some data from Holland and Israel. In Pianta, R. (Ed.), Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children's lives (pp. 5–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Waters, E., & Deane, K. E. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: The Q-methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood. In I Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50 (1, Serial No. 209).CrossRefGoogle Scholar