Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-d7bbv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:40:00.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative emotionality and externalizing problems in toddlerhood: Overreactive parenting as a moderator of genetic influences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Shannon T. Lipscomb ,
Leslie D. Leve ,
Daniel S. Shaw ,
Jenae M. Neiderhiser ,
Laura V. Scaramella ,
Xiaojia Ge ,
Rand D. Conger ,
John B. Reid  and
David Reiss
Shannon T. Lipscomb*
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Leslie D. Leve
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
Daniel S. Shaw
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Laura V. Scaramella
Affiliation:
University of New Orleans
Xiaojia Ge
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Rand D. Conger
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
John B. Reid
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
David Reiss
Affiliation:
Yale Child Study Center
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Shannon T. Lipscomb, Oregon State University Cascades Campus, 2600 NW College Way, Bend, OR 97701; E-mail: shannon.lipscomb@osucascades.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study examines the interplay between parental overreactivity and children's genetic backgrounds as inferred from birth parent characteristics on the development of negative emotionality during infancy, and in turn, to individual differences in externalizing problems in toddlerhood. The sample included 361 families linked through adoption (birth parents and adoptive families). Data were collected when the children were 9, 18, and 27 months old. Results indicated links between individual levels and changes in negative emotionality during infancy and toddlerhood to externalizing problems early in the third year of life. Findings also revealed an interaction between birth mother negative affect and adoptive mother overreactive parenting on children's negative emotionality. This Genotype × Environment interaction predicted externalizing problems indirectly through its association with negative emotionality and revealed stronger effects of genetic risk for children with less overreactive parenting from their mothers. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are discussed.

Information

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 167 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. S., O'Leary, S. G., Wolf, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 9, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, J. E., Freeland, C. B., & Lounsbury, M. L. (1979). Measurement of infant difficulties. Child Development, 50, 794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Ridge, B. (1998). Interaction of temperamental resistance to control and restrictive parenting in the development of externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 34, 982–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridgett, D. J., Gartstein, M. A., Putnam, S. P., McKay, T., Iddins, E., Robertson, C., et al. (2009). Maternal and contextual influences and the effect of temperament development during infancy and parenting in toddlerhood. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, S. A. (2009). Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: A meta-analysis of shared environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 609–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Button, T. M. M., Scourfield, J., Martin, N., Purcell, S., & McGuffin, P. (2005). Family dysfunction interacts with genes in the causation of antisocial symptoms. Behavior Genetics, 35, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadoret, R. J., Winokur, G., Langbehn, D., Troughton, E., Yates, W., & Stewart, M. (1996). Depression spectrum disease: The role of gene–environment interaction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 892–899.Google ScholarPubMed
Calkins, S. D. (2002). Origins and outcomes of individual differences in emotional regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 250–283.Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: Recommendations for prevention and intervention. In Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., & Maher, C. A. (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 339–366). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., Thornton, A., Freedman, D., Amell, J., Harrington, H., et al. (1996). The life history calendar: A research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6, 101–114.3.3.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L., Schwartz, D., Dodge, K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2003). Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1988). Arousal, affect, and attention as components of temperament. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 958–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Reiser, M. (1999). Parental reactions to children's negative emotions: Longitudinal relations to quality of children's social functioning. Child Development, 70, 513–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Valente, C., Spinrad, T. L., Cumberland, A., Liew, J., Reiser, M, et al. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children's effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 988–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M. E., Button, T. M. M., Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, M. (2007). Parenting and adolescent antisocial behavior and depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., Martin, D., Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., et al. (2008). Bridging the divide: Openness in adoption and post-adoption psychosocial adjustment among birth and adoptive parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H., Buss, K. A., & Lemery, K .S. (1997). Toddler and childhood temperament: Expanded content, stronger genetic evidence, new evidence for the importance of environment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, H. H., Lemery, K. S., Buss, K. A., & Campos, J. J. (1999). Genetic analysis of focal aspects of infant temperament. Developmental Psychology, 35, 972–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, S., & Sanson, A. (2001). Matching parenting to child temperament. Family Matters, 59, 42–47.Google Scholar
Hershberger, S. L. (1994). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation. In DeFries, J. C., Plomin, R., & Fulker, D. W. (Eds.), Nature and nurture during middle childhood (pp. 281–294). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hicks, B. M., South, S. C., DiRago, A. C., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. M. (2009). Environmental adversity and increasing genetic risk for externalizing disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, J., & Rothbart, M. K. (2003). Behavior genetic studies of infant temperament: Findings vary across parent-report instruments. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 112–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, R. F., South, S., Johnson, W., & Iacono, W. (2008). The heritability of personality is not always 50%: Gene–environment interactions and correlations between personality and parenting. Journal of Personality, 76, 1485–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). (2004). The role of the father in child development (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Larsson, H., Viding, E., Rijsdijk, F. V., & Plomin, R. (2008). Relationships between parental negatively and childhood antisocial behavior over time: A bidirectional effects model in a longitudinal genetically informed design. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemery, K. S., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on preschool sibling cooperation and conflict: associations with difficult temperament and parenting style. Marriage and Family Review, 33, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Ge, X., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Patterson, G. (2010). Refining intervention targets in family-based research: Lessons from quantitative behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 516–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Ge, X., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D., Scaramella, L. V., et al. (2009). Structured parenting of toddlers at high versus low genetic risk: Two pathways to child problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 1102–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Ge, X., Scaramella, L. V., Conger, R. D., Reid, J. B., et al. (2007). The Early Growth and Development Study: A prospective adoption design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 84–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Scaramella, L. V., & Reiss, D. (2008). The Early Growth and Development Study: Using the prospective adoption design to examine genotype–environment interplay. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40, 1106–1115.Google ScholarPubMed
Lipscomb, S. T., Leve, L. D., Harold, G., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D., Ge, X., et al. (2011). Trajectories of parenting and child negative emotionality: A longitudinal analysis during infancy and toddlerhood. Child Development, 82, 1661–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Parenting and its effects on children: On reading and misreading behavior genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M. (2005). Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, B. (2002). Beyond SEM: Latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Natsuaki, M. N., Ge, X., Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., Conger, R. D., et al. (2010). Genetic liability, environment, and the development of fussiness in toddlers: The role of maternal depression and parental responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1147–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., & Reiss, D. (2007). Disentangling the effects of genetics and prenatal drug exposure on toddler development. Paper presented at the Symposium on Prenatal Exposure to Substances: The Role of Genes, Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Neppl, T. K., Conger, R. D., Scaramella, L. V., & Ontai, L. L (2009). Intergenerational continuity in parenting behavior: Mediating pathways and child effects. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1241–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, T. G., Caspi, A., DeFries, J. C., & Plomin, R. (2003). Genotype–environment interaction in children's adjustment to parental separation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 849–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotype environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, T., & Lerner, L. V. (2007). A latent growth-cure approach to infant temperament. Infant and Child Development, 16, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: Bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical and applied parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 59–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Coon, H., Carey, G., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1991). Parent–offspring and sibling adoption analyses of parental ratings of temperament in infancy and childhood. Journal of Personality, 59, 705–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1983). Origins of individual differences in infancy: The Colorado adoption project. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raine, A., & Venables, P. H. (1984). Tonic heart rate level, social class and antisocial behaviour in adolescents. Biological Psychology, 18, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 106–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbaum, F., & Weisz, J. R. (1994). Parental caregiving and child externalizing problems in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 226–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., Pickles, A., Murray, R., & Eaves, L. J. (2001). Testing hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 291–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., & Silberg, J. (2002). Gene–environment interplay in relation to emotional and behavioral disturbance. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 463–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanson, A., Hempill, S. A., & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: A review. Social Development, 13, 142–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudino, K. J. (2005). Special Article: Behavioral genetics and child temperament. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudino, K. J., Plomin, R., & Defries, J. C. (1996). Tester-rated temperament at 14, 20, and 24 months: Environmental change and genetic continuity. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaramella, L., Neppl, T., Ontai, L., & Conger, R. (2008). Consequences of socioeconomic disadvantage across three generations: Parenting behavior and child externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 725–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scaramella, L. V., Sohr-Preston, S. L., Mirabile, S. P., Robinson, S. D., & Callahan, K. L. (2008). Parenting and children's distress reactivity: An examination of direction of effects. Social Development, 17, 578–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 137–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schonberg, M. S., & Shaw, D. S. (2007). Do the antecedents for child conduct problems differ for children reared in high and low-risk socioeconomic settings? Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, M., & Hofer, S. M. (2005). Social context in gene–environment interactions: Retrospect and prospect. Journals of Gerontology, 60B, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. S., & Bell, R. Q. (1993). Developmental theories of parental contributors to antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 493–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, D. S., Bell, R. Q., & Gilliom, M. (2000). A truly early starter model of antisocial behavior revisited. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, D. S., Gilliom, M., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Nagin, D. (2003). Trajectories leading to school-age conduct problems. Developmental Psychology, 39, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E. B., Owens, E. B., Vondra, J. I., Cohn, J. F., & Bell, R. Q. (1998). The development of early externalizing problems among children from low-income families: A transformational perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheese, B. E., Voelker, P. M., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2007). Parenting quality interacts with genetic variation in dopamine receptor D4 to influence temperament in early childhood. Developmental Psychopathology, 19, 1039–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stams, G. J., Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2002). Maternal sensitivity, infant attachment, and temperament in early childhood predict adjustment in middle childhood: The case of adopted children and their biologically unrelated parents. Developmental Psychology, 38, 806–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. S., Śeguin, J. R., Zoccolillo, M., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., et al. (2004). Physical aggression during early childhood: Trajectories and predictors. Pediatrics, 114, e43–e50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2006). Do early difficult temperament and harsh parenting differentially predict reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 685–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2002). Reactively and proactively aggressive children: Antecedent and subsequent characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widaman, K. (1995). On comparing apples and oranges. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar