Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-5mwv9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T18:11:12.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Aaron: How people respond to the Asymmetry is an empirical question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2022

Dean Spears Open the ORCID record for Dean Spears [Opens in a new window]
Dean Spears*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA
*
Email: dspears@utexas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , November 2023 , pp. 514 - 515
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaron, J.H. 2022. Reply to Spears’s ‘The Asymmetry of Population Ethics’. Economics and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267122000177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, D. 2020. The Asymmetry of population ethics: experimental social choice and dual-process moral reasoning. Economics and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267119000221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar