Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-t28k2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T03:23:51.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reframing the Past: Thoughts about Business Leadership and Decision Making under Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Naomi R. Lamoreaux
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do business leaders make decisions in the face of uncertainty? More important, how do business and economic historians write a narrative that links a business problem, its proposed solution, and the outcome of this action without allowing the success or failure of the decision to determine the trajectory of the story? Counterfactual hypotheses and contextual analysis provide two tools that can help historians minimize the distortions of hindsight and recover a sense of the contingency that surrounds all decisions.

Information

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 632 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2001. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge, Mass., 1967.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. Bernard. Innovation as a Social Process: Elihu Thomson and the Rise of General Electric, 1870-1900. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1962.Google Scholar
Clarke, Roger, and McGuinness, Tony, eds. The Economics of the Firm. Oxford, U.K., 1987.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy. Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert William.Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore, Md., 1964.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis, with Sewell, Jane Eliot. Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995.New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
Greising, David. I'd Like the World to Buy a Coke: The Life and Leadership of Roberto Goizueta. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History. Baltimore, Md., y1998.Google Scholar
Kirsch, David A. The Electric Vehicle and the Burden of History. New Brunswick, N.J., 2000.Google Scholar
Kwolek-Folland, Angel. Engendering Business: Men and Women in the Corporate Office, 1870-1930. Baltimore, Md., 1994.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter, . An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J., and Sabel, Charle F.. The Second Industrial Divide: Possi-bilities for Prosperity. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, N.J., 1975.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Endless Novelty: Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865-1925. Princeton, N.J., 1997.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia, 1800-1885. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Rationalityin Action. Cambridge, Mass., 2001.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. 3d ed., 1945; New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.. An Empirically Based Microeconomics. Cambridge, Mass., 1997.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.. Models of Man: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Sloan, Alfred P., Jr. My Years with General Motors. Garden City, N.Y., 1972.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. Taking Your Medicine: Drug Regulation in the United States. Cambridge, Mass., 1980.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Yates, JoAnne. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore, Md., 1993.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (June 1950): 211–21.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce. “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving beyond the Linguistic; A Response to David Harlan.” American Historical Review 94 (Dec. 1989): 1326–32.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. Bernard. “The Coordination of Business Organization and Technological Innovation with the Firm: A Case Study of the Thomson-Houstan Electric Company in the 1880s.” In Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, ed. , Naomi R. and Raff, Danie M. G.. Chicago, 1995, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
Harold, Demsetz. “Rationality, Evolution, and Acquisitiveness.” Economic Inquiry 34 (July 1996): 484–95.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch. “Hindsight ≠ Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 (Aug. 1975): 288–99.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, and Beyth, Ruth. “'I Knew It Would Happen': Remembered Probabilities of Once-Future Things.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13 (Feb. 1975): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hacker, Louis M. “The New Revolution in Economic History: A Review Article Based on Railroads and Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History by Robert William Fogel.” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History 3 (Spring 1966): 166–69.Google Scholar
Harlan, David. “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature.” American Historical Review 94 (June 1989): 581–609.Google Scholar
Heuer, Richards J. Jr. “Cognitive Biases: Problems in Hindsight Analysis.” In Inside CIA's Private World: Classified Articles from the Agency's Internal Journal, 1955-1992, ed. Westerfield, H. Bradford. New Haven, Conn., 1995, pp. 333–43.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Sugden, Rober. “Rationality in Action.” Mind 102 (Jan. 1993): 1–35.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt R., and Tirole, Jean. “The Theory of the Firm.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D., 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1989, vol. 1, 61–133.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. “Assets, Organizations, Strategies, and Traditions: Organizational Capabilities and Constraints in the Remaking of Ford Motor Company, 1946-1962.” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Daniel M. G., Raff, and Temin, Pete. Chicago, 1999, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A.. “Ford Automates: Technology and Organization in Theory and Prac-tice.” Business and Economic History 24 (1995): 59–71.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (Oct. 1976): 305–60.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amo. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (April 1984): 341–50.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amo. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Economet-rica 47 (March 1979): 263–91.Google Scholar
Machina, Mark J. “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (Summer 1987): 141–47.Google Scholar
Meyer, John R., and Conrad, Alfred H.. “Economic Theory, Statistical Inference, and Economic History.” Journal of Economic History 17 (Dec. 1957): 524–44.Google Scholar
Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Pete. “Sears, Roebuck in the Twentieth Century: Competition, Complementarities, and the Problem of Wasting Assets.” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, ed. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. Chicago, 1999, pp. 219–48.Google Scholar
Redlich, Fritz. “‘New’ and Traditional Approaches to Economic History and Their Interdependence.” Journal of Economic History 25 (Dec. 1965): 480–95.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations.” American Economic Review 69 (Sept. 1979): 493–513.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.. “Rationality in Psychology and Economics.” Journal of Business 59 (Oct. 1986): S209–24.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, ed. Tully, James. Princeton, N.J., 1988, pp. 63–64.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “Modes of Behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1 (June 1980): 175–95.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “History of Political Thought.” In New Perspectives on Historical Writing, ed. Burke, Pete. University Park, Pa., 1992, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Tully, James. “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner's Analysis of Politics.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, ed. Tully, James. Princeton, N.J., 1988, pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Danie. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (31 Jan. 1981): 453–58.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Reconciling Automation and Flexibility? Technology and Production in the Postwar British Motor Vehicle Industry.” Enterprise & Society 1 (March 2000): 9–62.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 1997-1999.Google Scholar
Newsletter of the Cliometric Society. 1992-1993.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. URL: http://dictionary.oed.com.Google Scholar
Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. URL: http://collections.chadwyck.com.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis, and Sturchio, Jeffrey L.. “Sustaining Innovation: Critical Transitions at Merck & Co., Inc.”Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. “Why Corporations Don't Learn Continuously: Waves of Innovation and Desperation at Ford Motor Company, 1903-1996.”Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. “Making Waves in the Computer Business: Critical Transitions at IBM.”Google Scholar