Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:47:08.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alien Abduction: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Management of Testimony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Peter Lipton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers how we decide whether to believe what we are told. Inference to the Best Explanation, a popular general account of non-demonstrative reasoning, is applied to this task. The core idea of this application is that we believe what we are told when the truth of what we are told would figure in the best explanation of the fact that we were told it. We believe the fact uttered when it is part of the best explanation of the fact of utterance. Having provided some articulation of this account of testimonial inference, the paper goes on to consider whether the account is informative and whether it is plausible.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , October 2007 , pp. 238 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth. 1995. “Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Mind 104: 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1965. “The Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophical Review 74: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1748/1999. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Beauchamp, T. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. Forthcoming. “Judgemental Genealogies and Historical Testimonies.”Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 1999. “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 1998. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1700/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 4th ed. Nidditch, P.H. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers. Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar