Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-gcwzt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T22:12:54.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New approach to weighted topological entropy and pressure

Part of: Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Ergodic theory Topological dynamics Smooth dynamical systems: general theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

MASAKI TSUKAMOTO
MASAKI TSUKAMOTO*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kyushu University, Moto-oka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
*
e-mail: tsukamoto@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Motivated by fractal geometry of self-affine carpets and sponges, Feng and Huang [J. Math. Pures Appl. 106(9) (2016), 411–452] introduced weighted topological entropy and pressure for factor maps between dynamical systems, and proved variational principles for them. We introduce a new approach to this theory. Our new definitions of weighted topological entropy and pressure are very different from the original definitions of Feng and Huang. The equivalence of the two definitions seems highly non-trivial. Their equivalence can be seen as a generalization of the dimension formula for the Bedford–McMullen carpet in purely topological terms.

Keywords

dynamical systemweighted topological entropyweighted topological pressurevariational principleBedford–McMullen carpet

MSC classification

Primary: 37D35: Thermodynamic formalism, variational principles, equilibrium states
Secondary: 37B40: Topological entropy 37A35: Entropy and other invariants, isomorphism, classification 37C45: Dimension theory of dynamical systems
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , March 2023 , pp. 1004 - 1034
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bedford, T.. Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimension in self-similarsets. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, 1984.Google Scholar
Barral, J. and Feng, D.-J.. Weighted thermodynamic formalism and applications. Preprint, 2009,arXiv:0909.4247.Google Scholar
Barral, J. and Feng, D.-J.. Weighted thermodynamic formalism on subshifts and applications.Asian J. Math. 16 (2012), 319–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R.. Topological entropy for noncompactsubsets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973),125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downarowicz, T. and Huczek, D.. Zero-dimensional principal extensions. Acta Appl.Math. 126 (2013), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinaburg, E. I.. A correlation between topological entropy andmetric entropy. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 190 (1970),19–22.Google Scholar
Downarowicz, T.. Entropy in Dynamical Systems.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J.. Equilibrium states for factor maps betweensubshifts. Adv. Math. 226 (2011),2470–2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J. and Huang, W.. Variational principle for weighted topological pressure. J.Math. Pures Appl. (9) 106 (2016), 411–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, T. N. T.. Relating topological entropy and measureentropy. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 3 (1971),176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwyn, L. W.. Topological entropy bounds measure-theoreticentropy. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (1969),679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, R. and Peres, Y.. Measures of full dimension on affine-invariant sets. Ergod.Th. & Dynam. Sys. 16 (1996), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, R. and Peres, Y.. Hausdorff dimensions of sofic affine-invariant sets. Israel J.Math. 94 (1996), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenstrauss, E. and Tsukamoto, M.. Double variational principle for mean dimension. Geom.Funct. Anal. 29 (2019), 1048–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Walters, P.. A relativised variational principle for continuous transformations.J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 16 (1977),568–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, C.. The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpinskicarpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96 (1984),1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misiurewicz, M.. A short proof of the variational principle for ${\mathbb{Z}}_{+}^N$ actions on a compact space. Int. Conf.on Dyn. Syst. Math. Phys. (Rennes, 1975) (Astérisque, 40). SociétéMathématique de France, Paris, 1976, pp.145–157.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D.. Statistical mechanics on a compact set with ${Z}^{\nu}$ action satisfying expansiveness and specification. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 185 (1973), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. A variational principle for the pressure of continuoustransformations. Amer. J. Math. 17 (1975),937–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory.Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yayama, Y.. Existence of a measurable saturated compensationfunction between subshifts and its applications. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 31(2011), 1563–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yayama, Y.. Application of a relative variational principle todimension of nonconformal expanding maps. Stoch. Dyn. 11 (2011),643–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar