Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-ks5gx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T08:23:08.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourses of Writing in Negāresh Textbooks: The Neglect of Social Practice and Sociopolitical Discourses in the Pedagogy of Persian Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2025

Kioumars Razavipour Open the ORCID record for Kioumars Razavipour [Opens in a new window]
Kioumars Razavipour*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
*
Email: razavipur57@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Writing, as a beacon of democracy, is crucial to the ability of citizens to think critically and to exercise their agency in the twenty-first century. Yet the full epistemic and critical potentials of writing are realized only if writing is properly theorized and understood. Although it is commonly held to be a matter of skill or personal creativity, writing is alternatively conceptualized as process, genre, social practice and sociopolitical action. This paper examines discourses of writing and its pedagogy in Iran’s secondary education writing textbooks, known as Negāresh. Analysis of the writing tasks and activities of the textbooks attests to the dominance of discourses (skills, process, and creativity) that narrow the domain of writing to the writer and textual output. More socially oriented discourses of writing are not foregrounded. The findings carry implications for Persian writing pedagogy.

Keywords

Negāresh textbooksPersian writingsecondary educationwriting discourseswriting theory
Type
Article
Information
Iranian Studies , First View , pp. 1 - 21
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Iranian Studies.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akhmedjanova, Diana, and Jeffery, Jill V.. “Secondary School Writing in Uzbekistan.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi, . Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Asgharpour Masouleh, Mehrdad, and Ghareh Gazi, Mehri. “Āmuzesh-e Negāresh-e Fārsi: Āsibhā va Rāhkārha.” In Proceedings of the First Conference on Persian Language Education, 2014.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. “Between Theory with a Big T and Practice with a Small P: Why Theory Matters.” In Practicing Theory in Second Language Writing, edited by Silva, Tony and Matsuda, Paul Kei, 5–18. Parlor Press. 2010.Google Scholar
Bai, Barry. “School Writing in Hong Kong: Current Status and Issues.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi, 58–77. Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9781003051404-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behizadeh, Nadia. “Missing the Sociopolitical: Examining Discourses of Writing in a US High-Performing, Urban Middle School.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 20, no. 1 (2021): 33–50.Google Scholar
Behizadeh, Nadia, and Engelhard, George Jr. “Historical View of the Influences of Measurement and Writing Theories on the Practice of Writing Assessment in the United States.” Assessing Writing 16, no. 3 (2011): 189–211.10.1016/j.asw.2011.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie, Helen Joy, Pryce, Alison, and Smith, Keith. “The Wicked Problem of Embedding Academic Literacies: Exploring Rhizomatic Ways of Working through an Adaptive Leadership Approach.” Higher Education Research and Development 36, no. 2 (2017): .10.1080/07294360.2016.1199539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, James “Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories.” College English 44, no. 8 (1982): .10.58680/ce198213663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, James. “Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.” College English 50, no. 5 (1988): .10.58680/ce198811381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomer, Randy, Land, Charlotte L., Cira Rubin, Jessica, and Van Dike, Laura M.. “Constructs of Teaching Writing in Research about Literacy Teacher Education.” Journal of Literacy Research 51, no. 2 (2019): 196–213.10.1177/1086296X19833783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjian, Maryam. English in Post-Revolutionary Iran: From Indigenization to Internationalization, vol. 29. Multilingual Matters, 2013.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre The Logic of Practice London: Polity, 1990.10.1515/9781503621749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy. Cambridge University Press, 2014.10.1017/CBO9781316106372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Julia. The Right to Write: An Invitation and Initiation into the Writing Life. Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh. “English as a Resource in a Communicative Assemblage: A Perspective from Flat Ontology.” In Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment, edited by Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R., 295–314. Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh. “Materializing ‘Competence’: Perspectives from International STEM Scholars.” Modern Language Journal 102, no. 2 (2018): .10.1111/modl.12464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Margaret. “Can Assessment Unlock and Open the Doors to Resourcefulness and Agency?” In Unlocking Assessment: Understanding for Reflection and Application, edited by Swaffield, Sue, 50–68. David Fulton, 2008.Google Scholar
Clark, Romy, and Ivanič, Roz. The Politics of Writing. Routledge, 2013.10.4324/9780203351741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. Writing and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139061063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Sharon. The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current-Traditional Rhetoric. SIU Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cumming, Alister. “Theoretical Orientations to L2 Writing.” Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing 11 (2016): 65–90.10.1515/9781614511335-006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabashi, Hamid. Persophilia: Persian Culture on the Global Scene. Harvard University Press, 2015.10.4159/9780674495777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWeese, Devin. “Persian and Turkic from Kazan to Tobolsk.” In The Persianate World: The Frontiers of a Eurasian Lingua Franca, edited by Green, Nile, . University of California Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Dias, Patrick, Freedman, Aviva, Medway, Peter, and Par, Anthony. Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Routledge, 2013.10.4324/9781410602336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elf, Nikolaj, and Troelsen, Solveig. “Between Joyride and High-Stakes Examination: Writing Development in Denmark.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Farhady, Hossein, and Tavassoli, Kobra. “Assessing Farsi.” In Companion to Language Assessment, vol. 4, edited by Kunnan, Antony John, 1765, . Wiley, 2013.Google Scholar
Ferris, Dana R., and Hedgcock, John S.. Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. Routledge, 2023.10.4324/9781003004943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Paul. “Writing and Writer Identity: The Poor Relation and the Search for Voice in ‘Personal Literacy.’” Literacy 52, no. 1 (2018): 11–19.10.1111/lit.12119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gāvān, Khajeh Emādoldin Mahmood. Manāzerol Enshā. Translated and edited by Madankan, Masoomeh. Tehran: Nashre Asār, 2003.Google Scholar
Ghasempour Moghaddam, H. “A Comparative Review of the Curriculum of Teaching Essay-Writing in the Secondary Education Systems of Germany and Iran.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 11, no. 41 (2016): 99–128.Google Scholar
Heard, Matthew. “What Should We Do with Postprocess Theory?”. Pedagogy 8, no. 2 (2008): 283–304.10.1215/15314200-2007-041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillocks, G. The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning. Teachers College Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hirose, Keiko. “Comparing L1 and L2 Organizational Patterns in the Argumentative Writing of Japanese EFL Students.” Journal of Second Language Writing 12, no. 2 (2003): 181–209.10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00015-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huot, Brian. “Toward a New Theory of Writing Assessment.” College Composition and Communication 47, no. 4 (1996): .10.58680/ccc19968674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. “Writing Theories and Writing Pedagogies.” Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching 4, no. 2 (2008): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hyon, Sunny. “Genre in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL.” TESOL Quarterly 30, no. 4 (1996): 693–722.10.2307/3587930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ian, Eyres. “Conceptualizing Writing and Identity.” In Writer Identity and the Teaching and Learning of Writing, edited by Cremin, Teresa and Locke, Terry, 3–18. Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education 18, no. 3 (2004): .10.1080/09500780408666877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Thomas. Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm. SIU Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kincheloe, Joe L. “Critical Pedagogy and the Knowledge Wars of the 21st Century.” In The Sage Handbook of Critical Pedagogies, edited by Steinberg, Shirley and Down, Barry, 75–93. Sage, 2020.10.4135/9781526486455.n19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalonek-Janczarek, Monika, and Kretzer, Michael M.. “Conceptualizations of Writing in Polish and South African Language Curricula for Grades 4–8 and 4–9.” Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny (2022): .Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. Learning to Write. Routledge, 2003.10.4324/9780203393048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, Ryoku. “Critical Approaches to Theory in Second Language Writing: A Case of Critical Contrastive Rhetoric.” In Practicing Theory in Second Language Writing, edited by Silva, Tony and Matsuda, Paul Kei, 191–208. Parlor Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kwak, Subeom. “Approaches Reflected in Academic Writing MOOCs.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18, no. 3 (2017).10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambirth, Andrew. “Exploring Children’s Discourses of Writing.” English in Education 50, no. 3 (2016): .10.1111/eie.12111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lea, Mary R., and Street, Brian V.. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23, no. 2 (1998): .10.1080/03075079812331380364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, Theresa. Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh University Press, 2013.10.1515/9780748637492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, Theresa, and Scott, Mary. “Defining Academic Literacies Research: Issues of Epistemology, Ideology and Strategy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 4, no. 1 (2007): 5–32.Google Scholar
Luke, Allen, and Woods, Annette. “Critical Literacies in Schools: A Primer.” Voices from the Middle 17, no. 2 (2009): 9–18.10.58680/vm20099457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthey, Sarah J., Woodard, Rebecca, and Kang, Grace. “Elementary Teachers Negotiating Discourses in Writing Instruction.” Written Communication 31, no. 1 (2014): 58–90.10.1177/0741088313510888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Colin P. “Persian Rhetoric in the Safavid Context: A 16th Century Nurbakhshiyya Treatise on Inshā.” In Literacy in the Persianate World: Writing and the Social Order, edited by Spooner, Brian and Hanaway, William L., 196–232. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.10.2307/j.ctt3fhh4r.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh (1): Pāye-ye Dahom, 6th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh (2): Pāye-ye Yāzdahom, 5th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh (3): Pāye-ye Davāzdahom, 4th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh Pāye-ye Haftom, 8th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh Pāye-ye Hashtom, 8th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Organization of Educational Research and Planning (OERP). Negāresh Pāye-ye Nohom, 8th ed. Tehran: Iran Company of Publishing School Textbooks, 2021.Google Scholar
Newell, George E., VanDerHeide, Jennifer, and Wynhoff Olsen, Allison. “High School English Language Arts Teachers’ Argumentative Epistemologies for Teaching Writing.” Research in the Teaching of English 49, no. 2 (2014): 95–119.10.58680/rte201426159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, Judy, and Jeffery, Jill. “We Are Similar, but Different in Writing Curriculum and Instruction.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi, 58–77. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Paulus, Trena, Jackson, Kristi, and Davidson, Judith. “Digital Tools for Qualitative Research.” Sage, 2013.Google Scholar
Peltzer, Katrin, Siekmann, Lea, Margaret Parr, Judy, and Busse, Vera. “What Beliefs about Writing Guide EFL Curricula? An Analysis of Relevant Policy Documents for Teaching English at German Secondary Schools.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 25, no. 6 (2022): .10.1007/s11618-022-01089-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. Routledge, 2017.10.4324/9781315457574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair, and Makoni, Sinfree. Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. Routledge, 2019.10.4324/9780429489396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. “An Analysis of Discourses of Writing and Writing Instruction in Curricula across Canada.” Curriculum Inquiry 42, no. 2 (2012): .Google Scholar
Pohlhaus, Gaile. “Varieties of Epistemic Injustice 1.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, 13–26. Routledge, 2017.10.4324/9781315212043-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Madison. “Creative Writing in English As an Additional Language Classroom.” In Critical Pedagogy in the Language and Writing Classroom, edited by Park, Gloria et al., 76–85. Taylor and Francis, 2023.10.4324/9781003357001-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razavipour, Kioumars, and Rezagah, Karim. “Language Assessment in the New English Curriculum in Iran: Managerial, Institutional, and Professional Barriers.” Language Testing in Asia 8 (2018): 1–18.10.1186/s40468-018-0061-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riazi, Abdolmehdi. “The Four Language Stages in the History of Iran.” In Decolonisation, Globalisation: Language-in-Education Policy and Practice, edited by Lin, Angel and Martin, Peter, . Multilingual Matters, 2005.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary. “Writing Reflexively: Students and Teachers Shaping Texts and Identities.” In Writer Identity and the Teaching and Learning of Writing, edited by Cremin, Teresa and Locke, Terry, . Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary, and Barton, Georgina. “The spatialized practices of teaching writing in Australian elementary schools: Diverse students shaping discoursal selves.” Research in the Teaching of English 48, no. 3 (2014): 303–329.https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201424580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, Kenneth J. The Politics of Education: A Critical Introduction. Routledge, 2018.10.4324/9781351110396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Tony. “Dangerous Writing: Understanding and Political Economy of Composition.” USU Press, 2009. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/166.10.2307/j.ctt4cgjnmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skar, Gustaf Bernhard, and Johannes Aasen, Arne. “School Writing in Norway: Fifteen Years with Writing as Key Competence.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, Peter, and Smith, Michael W.. “The Nature of Knowledge in Composition and Literary Understanding: The Question of Specificity.” Review of Educational Research 62, no. 3 (1992): 279–305.10.3102/00346543062003279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotomayor, Carmen, Jéldrez, Elvira, and Osorio, Gabriela. “School Writing in Chile: Standards and Research Evidence.” In International Perspectives on Writing Curricula and Development, edited by Jeffery, Jill and Parr, Judi, 37–57. Routledge, 2021.10.4324/9781003051404-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Lucy K., and Kite, Yuriko. “Beliefs and Practices of Writing Instruction in Japanese Elementary Schools.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 31, no. 1 (2018): 56–69.10.1080/07908318.2017.1338296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, Brian, and Hanaway, William L. “Persian As Koine: Written Persian in World-Historical Perspective.” In Literacy in the Persianate World: Writing and the Social Order, edited by Spooner, Brian and Hanaway, William L., 1–68. University of Pennsylvania Press. 2012.10.9783/9781934536568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturk, Erika, and Lindgren, Eva. “Discourses in Teachers’ Talk about Writing.” Written Communication 36, no. 4 (2019): .10.1177/0741088319862512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturk, Erika, Randahl, Ann-Christin, and Olin-Scheller, Christina. “Back to Basics? Discourses of Writing in Facebook Groups for Teachers.” Nordic Journal of Literacy Research 6, no. 2 (2020).10.23865/njlr.v6.2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tentolouris, Filippos. “Conceptualisations of Writing in the Curricula and the Teachers’ Guides of Greek Preschool Education: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Curriculum Journal 32, no. 2 (2021): .10.1002/curj.78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimbur, John. “Taking the Social Turn: Teaching Writing Post-Process.” College Composition and Communication 45, no. 1 (1994): .Google Scholar
Turner, Joan. On Writtenness: The Cultural Politics of Academic Writing. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.Google Scholar
Weth, Constanze, andJuffermans, Kasper. “Introduction: The Tyranny of Writing in Language and Society.” In Tyranny of Writing: Ideology of the Written Word, edited by Weth, Constanze and Juffermans, Kaspe. Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar
Young, Ross, and Ferguson, Felicity. Writing for Pleasure: Theory, Research and Practice. Routledge, 2020.10.4324/9780429268984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Shulin, Zhou, Yu, and Di Zhang, Emily. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write in L2 Writing Curriculum in Chinese Universities.” Language Teaching Research (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221113929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammit, Katina, Rhodes, Joan, and Milby, Tammy. “International Approaches to Writing Instruction: A Comparison of Curriculum in Australia and the USA.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 45, no. 1 (2022): 1.10.1007/s44020-022-00002-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar