Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-mjqqg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-14T22:06:59.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of feeding sugar syrup to honey-bee colonies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. Free  and
Yvette Spencer-Booth
J. B. Free
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Yvette Spencer-Booth
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Honey-bee colonies were fed either concentrated or dilute sugar syrup, or remained unfed, in spring, summer, and autumn of 1958 and 1959.

2. More concentrated than dilute syrup was accepted in every experiment, but the proportion of concentrated to dilute syrup accepted decreased during the course of both years.

3. The concentration of syrup fed made no apparent difference to the gain in weight relative to the sugar taken, probably because the greater efficiency in storing concentrated syrup was offset by the diminution in foraging produced.

4. Feeding dilute or concentrated syrup increased brood rearing during and after feeding in one year (bad weather) but had no effect on brood rearing in the other year (good weather).

5. While being fed colonies usually collected more pollen than they otherwise would.

6. Feeding either concentration of syrup probably decreased nectar gathering when foraging conditions were good, and concentrated syrup may have decreased it more than dilute syrup.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1961 , pp. 147 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Betts, A. D. (1934). Amer. Bee J. 74, 318.Google Scholar
Butler, C. G. (1946). Ann. Appl. Biol. 33, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. G., Free, J. B. & Simpson, J. (1956). Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, E. E. (1950). Bee World, 31, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. (1957). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 5, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. (1960). Bee World, 41, 141, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, K.v (1934). Z. vergl. Physiol. 21, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindauer, M. (1955). Bee World, 36, 62, 81, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, R. O. B. (1948). Beekeeping in Britain. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Ribbands, C. R. (1950). Bee World, 31, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribbands, C. R. (1953). The Behaviour and Social Life of Honeybees. London: Bee Research Association.Google Scholar
Root, A. I. (1945). ABC and XYZ of Bee Culture. (Revised by Root, E. R., Root, H. H. & Deyell, M. J..) Medina, Ohio: Root.Google Scholar
Soper, M. H. R. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedmore, E. B. (1932). A Manual of Beekeeping. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar