Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T05:46:28.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INFORMED CHOICE AND FEMALE STERILIZATION IN SOUTH ASIA AND LATIN AMERICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2018

Apoorva Jadhav Open the ORCID record for Apoorva Jadhav [Opens in a new window]  and
Emily Vala-Haynes
Apoorva Jadhav*
Affiliation:
Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Emily Vala-Haynes
Affiliation:
Division of Health and Exercise Science, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, OR, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: apoorva.jadhav@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Globally, female sterilization is one of the most popular contraceptive methods despite concerns about quality of care for women who report being sterilized. In this study, informed choice among sterilized women was quantified using Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 2000 to 2012 for countries in South Asia and Latin America. Three responses measured informed choice and knowledge about whether women were informed by a health worker or provider: that sterilization is permanent, the potential side-effects of sterilization and other methods of contraception. An ascending composite Method Information Index with scores ranging from 0 (women received no information) to 3 (women received information across all three indicators) was used. Using ordinal logistic regression analysis, the results indicated that women younger than 25 and older than 35 at the time of sterilization, and those at high parities, had lower odds of a high score on the index, while the opposite was true for women sterilized in the private sector in Latin America. Educated women in India had higher odds of a high score on the index, while the same was true for educated and wealthy women in Colombia. These findings indicate that not enough health care providers spend time informing women in South Asia and Latin America about different aspects of sterilization, and that there are specific groups of women that are more affected. There is an urgent need to improve quality of care within health systems providing sterilization for this very important and effective type of contraception.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 50 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 823 - 839
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amaral, E. & Potter, J. E. (2015) Determinants of female sterilization in Brazil, 2001–2007. RAND Working Paper Series WR-1093.Google Scholar
Barry, E. & Raj, S. (2014) 12 women die after botched government sterilizations in India. New York Times, 11th November 2014. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/world/asia/botched-government-sterilizations-india.html (accessed 12th March 2015).Google Scholar
Basu, A. M. (1984) Ignorance of family planning methods in India: an important constraint on use. Studies in Family Planning 15(3), 136–142.Google Scholar
Baveja, R., Buckshee, K., Das, K., Das, S. K., Hazra, M. N., Gopalan, S. et al. (2000) Evaluating contraceptive choice through the method-mix approach: an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Task Force study. Contraception 61(2), 113–119.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J. (2011) USAID Graduation from Family Planning Assistance: Implications for Latin America. URL: https://www.populationinstitute.org/external/files/reports/FINAL_LAC_Report.pdf (accessed 17th November 2015).Google Scholar
Boesten, J. (2007) Free choice or poverty alleviation? Population politics in Peru under Alberto Fujimori. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 82, 3.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J. & Watkins, S. C. (1996) Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review 22(4), 639–682.Google Scholar
Caetano, A. J. & Potter, J. E. (2004) Politics and female sterilization in northeast Brazil. Population and Development Review 30(1), 79–108.Google Scholar
Coa, R. & Ochoa, L. H. (2009) Bolivia Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud 2008. Calverton, MD, USA. URL: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR228/FR228.pdf Google Scholar
Credé, S., Hoke, T., Constant, D., Green, M. S., Moodley, J. & Harries, J. (2012) Factors impacting knowledge and use of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods by postpartum HIV positive and negative women in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 12(1), 197.Google Scholar
Curtis, K. M., Mohllajee, A. P. & Peterson, H. B. (2006) Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 73(2), 205–210.Google Scholar
da Costa Leite, I., Gupta, N. & do Nascimento Rodrigues, R. (2004) Female sterilization in Latin America: cross-national perspectives. Journal of Biosocial Science 36(6), 683–698.Google Scholar
Donaldson, P. J. (2002) The elimination of contraceptive acceptor targets and the evolution of population policy in India. Population Studies 56(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
EngenderHealth (2003) Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Patterns in Nepal: Norplant, IUCD, Pill, and Injectables. URL: https://www.engenderhealth.org/files/pubs/family-planning/nepal_report_on_contraceptive_use.pdf (accessed 12th March 2015).Google Scholar
Essack, Z. & Strode, A. (2012) ‘I feel like half a woman all the time’: the impacts of coerced and forced sterilisations on HIV-positive women in South Africa. Agenda 26(2), 24–34.Google Scholar
Geidel, M. (2010) ‘Sowing death in our women’s wombs’: modernization and indigenous nationalism in the 1960s Peace Corps and Jorge Sanjines’ ‘Yawar Mallku’. American Quarterly 62(3), 763–786.Google Scholar
Gribble, J. N., Sharma, S. & Menotti, E. P. (2007) Family planning policies and their impacts on the poor: Peru’s experience. International Family Planning Perspectives 33(4), 176–181.Google Scholar
Hardee, K., Harris, S., Rodriguez, M., Kumar, J., Bakamjian, L., Newman, K. & Brown, W. (2014) Achieving the goal of the London Summit on Family Planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: what can we learn from past experiences with coercion? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(4), 206–214.Google Scholar
Hosseni, H., Torabi, F. & Bagi, B. (2014) Demand for long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods among Kurdish Women in Mahabad, Iran. Journal of Biosocial Science 46(6), 772–785.Google Scholar
IWHR (2013) From Forced Sterilization to Forced Psychiatry: Report on the Violations of the Human Rights of Women with Disabilities and Transgender Persons in Colombia. Geneva, Switzerland. URL: http://www.law.cuny.edu/academics/clinics/iwhr/publications/IWHR-Report-Colombia-2013.pdf (accessed 24th March 2016).Google Scholar
James, K. S. (2011) India’s demographic change: opportunities and challenges. Science 333(6042), 576–580.Google Scholar
Joshi, R., Khadilkar, S. & Patel, M. (2015) Global trends in use of long-acting reversible and permanent methods of contraception: seeking a balance. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 131(Supplement 1), S60–S63.Google Scholar
Kendall, T. & Albert, C. (2015) Experiences of coercion to sterilize and forced sterilization among women living with HIV in Latin America. Journal of the International AIDS Society 18(1), 19462.Google Scholar
Koenig, M. A., Foo, G. H. C. & Joshi, K. (2000) Quality of care within the Indian Family Welfare Programme: a review of recent evidence. Studies in Family Planning 31(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Koenig, M. A., Rob, U., Khan, M. A., Chakraborty, J. & Fauveau, V. (1992) Contraceptive use in Matlab, Bangladesh in 1990: levels, trends, and explanations. Studies in Family Planning 23(6), 352–364.Google Scholar
Lee, J. K., Parisi, S. M., Akers, A. Y., Borrerro, S. & Schwarz, E. B. (2011) The impact of contraceptive counseling in primary care on contraceptive use. Journal of General Internal Medicine 26(7), 731–736.Google Scholar
Lizarzaburu, J. (2015) Forced sterilisation haunts Peruvian women decades on. BBC News, 2nd December 2015. URL: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-34855804.Google Scholar
Mallet, J. & Kalambi, V. (2008) Coerced and forced sterilization of HIV-positive women in Namibia. HIV AIDS Policy Law Review 13(2–3), 77–78.Google Scholar
Martin, R., Buttari, J., Macias, H. & Cobb, L. (1993) Aids Family Planning Program in Honduras. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Center for Development Information and Evaluation, Jun. xiv, Vol. 67, p. 53. A.I.D. Technical Report No. 9.Google Scholar
Miranda, J. J. & Yamin, A. E. (2004) Reproductive health without rights in Peru. Lancet 363(9402), 68–69.Google Scholar
Pieper Mooney, J. E. (2010) Re-visiting histories of modernization, progress, and (unequal) citizenship rights: coerced sterilization in Peru and in the United States. History Compass 8(9), 1036–1054.Google Scholar
Pradhan, M. R. & Ram, U. (2009) Female sterilization and ethical issues: the Indian experience. Social Change 39(3), 365–387.Google Scholar
Rizo, A. & Roper, L. (1986) The role of sterilization in Colombia’s family planning program: a national debate. International Family Planning Perspectives 12(2), 44–48.Google Scholar
Saeed, G. A., Fakhar, S., Rahim, F. & Tabassum, S. (2008) Change in trend of contraceptive uptake – effect of educational leaflets and counseling. Contraception 77(5), 377–381.Google Scholar
Salvo, J. J., Powers, M. G. & Cooney, R. S. (1992) Contraceptive use and sterilization among Puerto Rican women. Family Planning Perspectives 24(5), 219–223.Google Scholar
Santiso-Galvez, R., Ward, V. & Bertrand, J. (2015) Family Planning in Nicaragua: The Achievements of 50 Years. Chapel Hill, NC, USA. URL: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/resources/publications/sr-15-118f/ (accessed 24th March 2016).Google Scholar
Singh, A., Ogollah, R., Ram, F. & Pallikadavath, S. (2012) Sterilization regret among married women in India: implications for the Indian national family planning program. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(4), 187–195.Google Scholar
Stern, A. M. (2005) STERILIZED in the Name of Public Health. American Journal of Public Health 95(7), 1128–1138.Google Scholar
Sullivan, T., Bertrand, J., Rice, J. & Shelton, J. (2006) Skewed contraceptive method mix: why it happens, why it matters. Journal of Biosocial Science 38(4), 501–521.Google Scholar
Teferra, A. S. & Wondifraw, A. A. (2015) Determinants of long acting contraceptive use among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: evidence from EDHS. Science 3(1), 143–149.Google Scholar
Terborgh, A., Rosen, J. E., Gálvez, R. S., Terceros, W., Bertrand, J. T. & Bull, S. E. (1995) Family planning among indigenous populations in Latin America. International Family Planning Perspectives 21(4), 143–166.Google Scholar
Thapa, S. & Friedman, M. (1998) Female sterilization in Nepal: a comparison of two types of service delivery. International Family Planning Perspectives 24(2), 78–83.Google Scholar
Track20 (2015) Data Sources and Methodology for FP2020 Core Indicators: 2014–15 Report. Track 20: Monitoring Progress in Family Planning. URL: http://www.track20.org/pages/data/data_sources_and_methodology (accessed 19th July 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations. (2013) World Contraceptive Patterns. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. URL: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/worldContraceptivePatternsWallChart2013.pdf (accessed 19th July 2015).Google Scholar
Visaria, L., Jejeebhoy, S. & Merrick, T. (1999) From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. International Family Planning Perspectives 25, S44–S49.Google Scholar
WHO (2014) Eliminating Forced, Coercive and Otherwise Involuntary Sterilization. An Interagency Statement. OHCHR, UN Women, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WHO. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112848/1/9789241507325_eng.pdf (accessed 20th October 2015).Google Scholar