Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-g5lq8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T00:42:00.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency of intercourse and contraceptive choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Jeffrey E. Glor  and
Lawrence J. Severy
Jeffrey E. Glor
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
Lawrence J. Severy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of frequency of intercourse on perceptions of two of the most widely used contraceptive methods, the pill and condom, were assessed in 128 female college students currently involved in a sexual relationship. Intercourse frequency was found to be strongly associated with knowledge of both methods. People experiencing more frequent sexual intercourse were more favourably disposed towards the pill and less towards the condom than people experiencing intercourse less frequently. Implications of these results are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 231 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © 1990, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, P., Mcpherson, K., Beeching, N., Weinberg, J. & Vessey, M. (1978) Sexual behaviour and contraceptive practice of undergraduates at Oxford University. J. biosoc. Sci. 10, 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. B., Severy, L. J. & Ahtola, O. T. (1978) An extended expectancy-value approach to contraceptive alternatives. J. Popul. 1, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvetkovich, G. & Grote, B. (1981) Psychosocial maturity and teenage contraceptive use: an investigation of decision-making and communication skills. Popul. Envir. 4, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diclemente, R. J., Zorn, J. & Temoshok, L. (1986) Adolescents and AIDS: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about AIDS in San Francisco. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 76, 1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. R., Selstad, G. & Welcher, W. H. (1976) Teenagers: fertility control behavior and attitudes before and after abortion, childbearing, or negative pregnancy test. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 7, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA.Google Scholar
Foreit, K. G. & Foreit, J. R. (1978) Correlates of contraceptive behavior among unmarried US college students. Stud. Fam. Plann. 9, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, B. D. & Gerrard, M. (1984) Predicting male and female contraceptive behavior: a discriminant analysis of groups high, moderate and low in contraceptive effectiveness. J. Personal. social Psychol. 46, 669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herold, E. S. & Mcnamee, J. E. (1982) An explanatory model of contraceptive use among young single women. J. Sex Res. 18, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegeles, S. M., Adler, N. E. & Irwin, C. E. (1988) Sexually active adolescents and condoms: changes over one year in knowledge, attitudes and use. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 78, 460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Severy, L. J. (1982) Contraceptive Decisions: Spousal Relationships, Method Commitment, and Expectancy-value. Center for Population Research, NICHD, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Simkins, L. & Kushner, A. (1986) Attitudes towards AIDS, herpes II, and toxic shock syndrome: two years later. Psychol. Rep. 59, 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanfer, K. & Rosenbaum, E. (1986) Contraceptive perceptions and method choice among young single women in the United States. Stud. Fam. Plann. 17, 269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelnick, M. & Kanter, J. F. (1978) Sexual and contraceptive experience of young unmarried women. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 9, 55.Google Scholar