Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-kmmxp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T04:29:44.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correcting Citizens’ Misperceptions about non-Western Immigrants: Corrective Information, Interpretations, and Policy Opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2020

Frederik Juhl Jørgensen Open the ORCID record for Frederik Juhl Jørgensen [Opens in a new window]  and
Mathias Osmundsen Open the ORCID record for Mathias Osmundsen [Opens in a new window]
Frederik Juhl Jørgensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Mathias Osmundsen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: fj@ps.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can corrective information change citizens’ misperceptions about immigrants and subsequently lead to favorable immigration opinions? While prior studies from the USA document how corrections about the size of minority populations fail to change citizens’ immigration-related opinions, they do not examine how other facts that speak to immigrants’ cultural or economic dependency rates can influence immigration policy opinions. To extend earlier work, we conducted a large-scale survey experiment fielded to a nationally representative sample of Danes. We randomly expose participants to information about non-Western immigrants’ (1) welfare dependency rate, (2) crime rate, and (3) proportion of the total population. We find that participants update their factual beliefs in light of correct information, but reinterpret the information in a highly selective fashion, ultimately failing to change their policy preferences.

Keywords

public opinioninformationimmigrationbelief-updatingimmigration policy opinionssurvey experiment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Spring 2022 , pp. 64 - 73
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UCDET3 (Jørgensen and Osmundsen, 2019). We thank Mona Kleinberg, Bolette Danckert, participants at the Political Behavior workshop at Aarhus University, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This paper was first presented at the 2018 Midwest Political Science Association Conference in Chicago. We have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

Alesina Alberto, Armando Miano and Stancheva, Stefanie. 2018. Immigration and Redistribution. NBER Working Paper 24733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrera Rodriguez, Oscar, Guriev, Sergei, Henry, Emeric , and Zhuravskaya, Ekatarina. 2020. Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics 182: 104123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, James and Geddes, Andrew. 2018. Brexit and the perils of ‘Europeanised’ migration. Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, Peter T. and Sønderskov, Kim M.. 2015. Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: Evidence from the Micro-Context. American Sociological Review 80(3): 550–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivations and Opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics 69(4): 957–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik. 2013. Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination. American Political Science Review 107(1): 159–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J., Sides, John, and Citrin, Jack. 2019. The Muted Consequences of Correct Information about Immigration. The Journal of Politics 81(1): 315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Frederik and Osmundsen, Mathias. 2020. Replication Data for: Correcting Citizens’ misperceptions about non-Western Immigrants: Corrective Information, Interpretations, and Policy Opinions. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1–10. doi: 10.7910/DVN/UCDET3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3): 480–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kustov, Alexander, Laaker, Dillon, and Reller, Cassidy. 2019. The Stability of Immigration Attitudes: Evidence and Implications. SSRN Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D and Sides, John. 2014. The Consequences of Political Innumeracy. Research & Politics 1(2): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., and Lavine, Jeffrey. 1993. Innumeracy about Minority Populations. Public Opinion Quarterly 57(3): 332–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John and Citrin, Jack. 2007. European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests, and Information. British Journal of Political Science 37(3): 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S and Lodge, Milton. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Cara, Bowers, Jake, Williams, Tarah, and Simmons, Katherine D.. 2012. Bringing the Person Back In: Boundaries, Perceptions, and the Measurement of Racial Context. The Journal of Politics 74(4), 1153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jørgensen and Osmundsen supplementary material

Appendices

Download Jørgensen and Osmundsen supplementary material(File)
File 693.9 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Jørgensen and Osmundsen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UCDET3
Link