Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-89v5q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T23:39:20.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital Structure, Precautionary Balances, and Valuation of the Firm: The Problem of Financial Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

P. A. Tinsley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A useful distinction is sometimes maintained between business risk associated with uncertainty of receipts generated by a firm's assets and financial risk defined as the probability of incurring penalty costs stemming from liability claims on assets and asset yields. In fact, disagreement in recent literature on the exact role of capital structure in market valuation of business firms is easily interpreted once the risk assumptions of the literature such as perfect certainty, business risk, and financial risk have been identified.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 33 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barges, A., The Effect of Capital Structure on the Cost of Capital, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice—Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
[2]Baumol, W., and Malkiel, B., “The Firm's Optimal Debt–Equity Combination and the Cost of Capital, ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1967, pp. 548–578.Google Scholar
[3]Baxter, N., “Leverage, Risk of Ruin and the Cost of Capital,” Journal of Finance, September 1967, pp. 395–403.Google Scholar
[4]Bierman, H., “Risk and the Addition of Debt to the Capital Structure,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, December 1968, pp. 415–426.Google Scholar
[5]Bodenhorn, D., “A Cash–Flow Concept of Profit,” Journal of Finance, March 1964, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
[6]Cunningham, N., “Business Investment and the Marginal Cost of Funds,” Metroeaonomiaa (Part II), December 1958, pp. 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Donaldson, G., Corporate Debt Capacity, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[8]Dougall, H., and Guthmann, H., Corporate Financial Policy, 5th ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice—Hall, 1962.Google Scholar
[9]Eppen, G., and Fama, E., “Solutions for Cash–Balance and Simple Dynamic– Portfolio Problems,” Journal of Business, January 1968, pp. 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fisher, I., The Nature of Capital and Income, New York: Macmillan, 1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Fisher, L., The Theory of Interest, New York: Macmillan, 1930.Google Scholar
[12]Fisher, L., “Determinants of Risk Premiums on Corporate Bonds,” Journal of Political Economy, June 1959, pp. 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Haavelmo, T., A Study in the Theory of Investment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
[14]Jorgensen, D., “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior,” American Economic Review, May 1963, pp. 247–259.Google Scholar
[15]Kalecki, M., “The Principle of Increasing Risk,” Economica, 1937, pp. 440–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Kuh, E., “Capital Theory and Capital Budgeting,” Metroeconomica, August–December 1960, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
[17]Lintner, J., “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1965, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
[18]Lintner, J., “Corporation Finance: Risk and Investment,” Determinants of Investment Behavior, Universities–National Bureau Conference, New York: Columbia University Press, 1967, pp. 215–254.Google Scholar
[19]Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection, New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
[20]Miller, M., and Modigliani, F., “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment,” American Economic Review, June 1958, pp. 261–297.Google Scholar
[21]Miller, M., and Modigliani, F., “Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry, 1954–57,” American Economic Review, June 1966, pp. 333–391.Google Scholar
[22]Miller, M., and Modigliani, F., and Orr, D., “A Model of the Demand for Money by Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1966, pp. 413–435.Google Scholar
[23]Myers, S., and Robichek, A., “Problems in the Theory of Optimal Capital Structure,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, June 1966, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
[24]Orr, D., Production Stability and Inventory Variation, Econometric Research Program, Research Memorandum No. 15, Princeton, N.J.: March 1960.Google Scholar
[25]Pierce, J., “Commercial Bank Liquidity,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 1966, pp. 1093–1101.Google Scholar
[26]Quirk, J., “The Capital Structure of Firms and the Risk of Failure,” International Economic Review, May 1961, pp. 210–228.Google Scholar
[27]Sharpe, W., “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, September 1964, pp. 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Tobin, J., “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk,” Review of Economic Studies, February 1958, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Vickers, D., The Theory of the Firm: Production, Capital, and Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.Google Scholar
[30]Wald, A., Sequential Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1947.Google Scholar
[31]Whalen, E., “A Rationalization of the Precautionary Demand for Cash,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1966, pp. 314–324.Google Scholar