Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-bcq64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-18T04:05:11.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative Risk Aversion: Increasing or Decreasing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Philip E. Graves
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The existence of risk aversion in portfolio theory can be explained by positing a concave utility function of wealth. In some cases it is useful to construct some measure of risk aversion rather than merely accept its existence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 205 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[I]Agnew, N. H.; Agnew, R. A.; Rasmussen, J.; and Smith, K. R.. “An application of Chance Constrained Programming to Portfolio Selection in a Casualty Insurance Firm.” Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 10 (06 1969), pp. B512–B520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arrow, K. J. “Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing.” Lecture 2, Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures. Helsinki: The Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation (1965).Google Scholar
[3]Arrow, K. J.. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company (1971), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
[4]Baumol, W. J. “An Expected Gain-Confidence Limit Criterion for Portfolio Selection.”Management Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 (10 1963), pp. 174–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Becker, G. M., and McClintock, C. G.. “Value: Behavioral Decision Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 18 (1967), pp. 239–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[6]Friedman, M. “The Demand for Money: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 67 (1959), pp. 327–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Goldfeld, S. M. “The Demand for Money Revisited.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 3 (1973), pp. 577–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Graves, P. E. “New Evidence on Income and the Velocity of Money.” Economic Inquiry, Vol. XVI, No. 1 (01 1978), pp. 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Graves, P. E.. “Wealth and Cash Asset Proportions.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. VIII, No. 4 (11 1976), pp. 487–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Latane, H. “Income Velocity and Interest Rates: A Pragmatic Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 42 (1960), pp. 445–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection. New Haven: Yale University Press (1959).Google Scholar
[12]Meltzer, A. H. “The Demand for Money: The Evidence from Time Series.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 71 (1963), pp. 219–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Perlman, M. “International Differences in Liquid Assets Portfolios.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago (1966).Google Scholar
[14]Perlman, M. “International Differences in Liquid Assets Portfolios.” In Varieties of Monetary Experience (1970), Chap. 5, edited by Meiselman, D..Google Scholar
[15]Pyle, D. H., and Turnovsky, S. J.. “Risk Aversion in Chance Constrained Portfolio Selection.” Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 3 (11 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Selden, R. T. “Monetary Velocity in the United States.” In Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, edited by Friedman, M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1956), pp. 179–257.Google Scholar
[7]Stiglitz, J. E. “The Effects of Income, Wealth, and Capital Gains Taxation on Risk-Taking.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (05 1969), pp. 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar