Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-bg8zk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-12T17:48:08.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Tale of Fear and Euphoria in the Stock Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2025

Hui Guo
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati Lindner College of Business guohu@ucmail.uc.edu
Qian Lin*
Affiliation:
Wuhan University School of Economics and Management
Yujou Pai
Affiliation:
Concordia University John Molson School of Business University of Cincinnati Lindner College of Business paiyu@ucmail.uc.edu
*
cumtsdu@gmail.com (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We propose a consumption-based model to explain puzzling unstable (i.e., sometimes positive and sometimes negative) relations between stock market variance with both stock market risk premia and prices. In the model, market risk premia depend positively (negatively) on fear (euphoria) variance. Market prices, which decrease with discount rates, correlate negatively (positively) with fear (euphoria) variance. Because it is the sum of fear and euphoria variances, the market variance may correlate positively or negatively with expected returns and prices, depending on the relative importance of the two variances. Our empirical results support the model’s key assumptions and many novel implications.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

The paper formerly circulated under the titles “On the Stock Market Variance-Return or Price Relations: A Tale of Two Variances” and “On the Stock Market Variance-Return or Price Relations: A Tale of Fear and Euphoria.” We thank Thierry Foucault (the editor) and the anonymous referee for many insightful and constructive comments that greatly improve the exposition of the paper. We are grateful to Hengjie Ai, Gurdip Bakshi, Zhifeng Cai, Colin Campbell, Hung-Kun Chen, Jiakai Chen, Wen-I Chuang, John Crosby, Peter Easton, Mike Ferguson, David Hirshleifer, Victor Huang, Ye Li, Joon Ho Kim, Qianqiu Liu, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Ghon Rhee, Mehmet Saglam, Gill Segal, Ivan Shaliastovich, Tray Spilker, Chi-Yang Tsou, Harald Uhlig, Wenyu Wang, Ingrid Werner, Robert Whitelaw, Chen Xue, Shu Yan, Tong Yu, and seminar and conference participants at the University of Cincinnati, the University of Hawaii, National Taiwan University, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, the 2019 Midwest Finance Association Meeting, the 2019 American Finance Association PhD Student Poster Session, the 2020 Financial Management Association Meeting, the 2021 Frontiers of Factor Investing Conference, and the 2022 Midwest Economic Theory and International Trade Conference for comments and suggestions. We thank Dimitris Papanikolaou at Northwestern University for providing the industry classification data, David Ng at Cornell University for the implied cost of capital data, and Buhui Qiu at the University of Sydney for the average options-implied variance data.

References

Adrian, T.; Crump, R. K.; and Vogt, E.. “Nonlinearity and Flight-to-Safety in the Risk-Return Trade-Off for Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 74 (2019), 10311973.Google Scholar
Bakshi, G.; Crosby, J.; Gao, X.; Xue, J.; and Zhou, W.. “The Options-Inferred Equity Premium and the Slippery Slope of the Negative Correlation Condition.” Journal of Investment Management, 22 (2024), 125.Google Scholar
Bansal, R.; Dittmar, R. F.; and Lundblad, C. T.. “Consumption, Dividends, and the Cross Section of Equity Returns.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 16391672.Google Scholar
Bansal, R.; Kiku, D.; and Yaron, A.. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Long-Run Risks Model for Asset Prices.” Critical Finance Review, 1 (2012), 183221.Google Scholar
Bansal, R., and Yaron, A.. “Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 14811509.Google Scholar
Beeler, J., and Campbell, J. Y.. “The Long-Run Risks Model and Aggregate Asset Prices: An Empirical Assessment.” Critical Finance Review, 1 (2012), 141182.Google Scholar
Bekaert, G., and Engstrom, E.. “Asset Return Dynamics Under Habits and Bad Environment-Good Environment Fundamentals.” Journal of Political Economy, 125 (2017), 713760.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Shiller, R. J.. “The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1988), 195228.Google Scholar
Clark, T. E., and McCracken, M. W.. “Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 105 (2001), 85110.Google Scholar
Croce, M. M.Long-Run Productivity Risk: A New Hope for Production-Based Asset Pricing?Journal of Monetary Economics, 66 (2014), 1331.Google Scholar
Davydiuk, T.; Richard, S.; Shaliastovich, I.; and Yaron, A.. “How Risky Are the U.S. Corporate Assets?Journal of Finance, 78 (2023), 141208.Google Scholar
Easton, P. D.PE Ratios, PEG Ratios, and Estimating the Implied Expected Rate of Return on Equity Capital.” Accounting Review, 79 (2004), 7395.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 19751999.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607636.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. D. M.The Dynamic Effects of Neutral and Investment-Specific Technology Shocks.” Journal of Political Economy, 114 (2006), 413451.Google Scholar
Gao, C., and Martin, I.. “Volatility, Valuation Ratios, and Bubbles: An Empirical Measure of Market Sentiment.” Journal of Finance, 76 (2021), 32113254.Google Scholar
Garlappi, L., and Song, Z.. “Can Investment Shocks Explain the Cross Section of Equity Returns?Management Science, 63 (2016), 38293848.Google Scholar
Garlappi, L., and Song, Z.. “Capital Utilization, Market Power, and the Pricing of Investment Shocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 126 (2017), 447470.Google Scholar
Garlappi, L., and Song, Z.. “Investment Shocks and Asset Prices: An Investment-Based Approach.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55 (2020), 26652699.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, W.; Lee, C.; and Swaminathan, B.. “Toward the Implied Cost of Capital.” Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (2001), 135176.Google Scholar
Ghaderi, M.; Kilic, M.; and Seo, S. B.. “Learning, Slowly Unfolding Disasters, and Asset Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics, 143 (2022), 527549.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. R., and Gordon, M. J.. “The Finite Horizon Expected Return Model.” Financial Analysts Journal, 53 (1997), 5261.Google Scholar
Guo, H.Limited Stock Market Participation and Asset Prices in a Dynamic Economy.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39 (2004), 495516.Google Scholar
Guo, H., and Pai, Y.-J.. “Rediscovering the CCAPM Lost in Data Revisions.” Working Paper, University of Cincinnati (2020).Google Scholar
Guo, H., and Savickas, R.. “Average Idiosyncratic Volatility in G7 Countries.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 12591296.Google Scholar
Guo, H.; Savickas, R.; Wang, Z.; and Yang, J.. “Is the Value Premium a Proxy for Time-Varying Investment Opportunities? Some Time-Series Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2009), 133154.Google Scholar
Guo, H., and Whitelaw, R. F.. “Uncovering the Risk-Return Relation in the Stock Market.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 14331463.Google Scholar
Hartzmark, S. M.Economic Uncertainty and Interest Rates.” Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 6 (2016), 179220.Google Scholar
Herskovic, B.; Kelly, B.; Lustig, H.; and Van Nieuwerburgh, S.. “The Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility: Quantitative Asset Pricing Implications.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 249283.Google Scholar
Ju, N., and Miao, J.. “Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns.” Econometrica, 80 (2012), 559591.Google Scholar
Justiniano, A.; Primiceri, G. E.; and Tambalotti, A.. “Investment Shocks and Business Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 57 (2010), 132145.Google Scholar
Kaltenbrunner, G., and Lochstoer, L.. “Long-run Risk Through Consumption Smoothing.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 31903224.Google Scholar
Kilic, M., and Shaliastovich, I.. “Good and Bad Variance Premia and Expected Returns.” Management Science, 65 (2019), 25222544.Google Scholar
Kogan, L., and Papanikolaou, D.. “Firm Characteristics and Stock Returns: The Role of Investment-Specific Shocks.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 27182759.Google Scholar
Kogan, L., and Papanikolaou, D.. “Growth Opportunities, Technology Shocks, and Asset Prices.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 675718.Google Scholar
Lettau, M.; Ludvigson, S.; and Wachter, J. A.. “The Declining Equity Premium: What Role Does Macroeconomic Risk Play?Review of Accounting Studies, 21 (2008), 16531687.Google Scholar
Li, Y.; Ng, D. T.; and Swaminathan, B.. “Predicting Market Returns Using Aggregate Implied Cost of Capital.” Journal of Financial Economics, 110 (2013), 419436.Google Scholar
Lochstoer, L., and Muir, T.. “Volatility Expectations and Returns.” Journal of Finance, 77 (2022), 10551096.Google Scholar
Ludvigson, S., and Steindel, C.. “How Important is the Stock Market Effect on Consumption?Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 5 (1999), 2951.Google Scholar
Malloy, C. J.; Moskowitz, T. J.; and Vissing-Jørgensen, A.. “Long-Run Stockholder Consumption Risk and Asset Returns.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 24272479.Google Scholar
Martin, I.What Is the Expected Return on the Market?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 367433.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C.An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Econometrica, 41 (1973), 867887.Google Scholar
Nagel, S., and Xu, Z.. “Asset Pricing with Fading Memory.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2022), 21902245.Google Scholar
Ohlson, J. A., and Juettner-Nauroth, B. E.. “Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinants of Value.” Review of Accounting Studies, 10 (2005), 349365.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, D.Investment Shocks and Asset Prices.” Journal of Political Economy, 119 (2011), 639685.Google Scholar
Pastor, L.; Sinha, M.; and Swaminathan, B.. “Estimating the Intertemporal Risk-Return Tradeoff Using the Implied Cost of Capital.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 28592897.Google Scholar
Pastor, L., and Veronesi, P.. “Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices.” American Economic Review, 99 (2009), 14511483.Google Scholar
Ramey, V. A.Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, Taylor, J. B. and Uhlig, H., eds. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V. (2016), 71162.Google Scholar
Segal, G.Tale of Two Volatilities: Sectoral Uncertainty, Growth, and Asset Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics, 134 (2019), 110140.Google Scholar
Segal, G.; Shaliastovich, I.; and Yaron, A.. “Good and Bad Uncertainty: Macroeconomic and Financial Market Implications.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 369397.Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J.Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?American Economic Review, 71 (1981), 421436.Google Scholar
Vissing-Jørgensen, A.Limited Asset Market Participation and the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution.” Journal of Political Economy, 110 (2002), 825853.Google Scholar
Working, H.Note on the Correlation of First Differences of Averages in a Random Chain.” Econometrica, 28 (1960), 916918.Google Scholar
Yang, A. “Understanding Negative Risk-Return Trade-Offs.” Working Paper, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4116731 (2022).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Guo et al. supplementary material

Guo et al. supplementary material
Download Guo et al. supplementary material(File)
File 569.9 KB