Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-xnzsz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T03:08:06.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the time development of meander bends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Gary Parker  and
Edmund D. Andrews
Gary Parker
Affiliation:
US Geological Survey, Lakewood, Colorado 80225
Edmund D. Andrews
Affiliation:
St Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the theory of Ikeda, Parker & Sawai (1981), meander migration rate at a point depends on a convolution integral of channel curvature from that point upstream. The problem can be quantified in terms of the bend equation. The time development of periodic bend trains of finite amplitude is analysed using the method of two-timing. The results apply near the critical wavenumber for the growth of bends of infinitesimal amplitude.

A finite-amplitude equilibrium state bifurcating from the null state at the critical wavenumber was delineated by Parker, Diplas & Akiyama (1983): they called the resulting solution the Kinoshita curve. It is found herein that this equilibrium state is unstable. Bends of longer Cartesian wavelength grow to cutoff. Shorter bends are obliterated. Nevertheless, in either case, the bend train tends towards the shape of the Kinoshita curve.

The theory suggests that some growing bends may be stabilized by local obstructions to downstream migration. The obstructions would cause an effective reduction in Cartesian wavelength, moving the bend from the unstable regime to the stable regime. A rather crude check of bend shape and rates of deformation generally lends support to the analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 162 , January 1986 , pp. 139 - 156
Copyright
© 1986 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beck, S. M. 1983a Lateral Channel Stability of the Pembina River near Rossington, Canada. Research Council of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Beck, S. M. 1983b Mathematical modeling of meander interaction. In Proceedings, Rivers, ′83 Specialty Conference on River Meandering, A8CE, October 24–26, New Orleans, USA, 932–941.
Blondeaux, P. & Seminara, G. 1985 A unified bar-bend theory of river meanders. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 449–470.Google Scholar
Carson, M. A. & Lapointe, M. F. 1983 The inherent asymmetry of river meander planform. J.Geol. 91, 41–55.Google Scholar
Engelund, F. 1974 Flow and bed topography in channel bends. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 100, 1631–1648.Google Scholar
Hickin, E. J. 1974 The development of meanders in natural river-channels. America Journal of Science 274, 414–442.Google Scholar
Hickin, E. J. 1979 Concave-bank benches on the Squamish River, British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 16, 200–203.Google Scholar
Hickin, E. J. & Nanson, G. C. 1975 The character of channel migration on the Beatton River,Northeast British Columbia, Canada. Geol. Soc. Am. Butt. 86, 487–494.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. Leb. 1975 Distribution of sediment transport and shear stress in a meander bend. J.Ecology 83, 543–565.Google Scholar
Howard, A. D. & Knutson, T. R. 1985 Sufficient conditions for river meandering: a simulation approach. Water Resources Res. (In the Press.)
Ikeda, S., Parker, G. & Sawai, K. 1981 Bend theory of river meanders. 1. Linear development. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 363–377.Google Scholar
Jefferson, M. 1902 The limiting width of meander belts. Natl Geog. Mag. 13, 373–384.Google Scholar
Kikkawa, H., Ikeda, S. & Kitagawa, A. 1976 Flow and bed topography in curved open channels. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 102, 1327–1342.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, R. 1961 An Investigation of Channel Deformation of the Ishikari River. Publication no. 36, Natural Resources Division, Ministry of Science and Technology of Japan, 139 pp. (in Japanese).
Kitanidis, P. K. & Kennedy, J. F. 1984 Secondary current and river-meander formation. J.Fluid Mech. 144, 217–230.Google Scholar
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G. & Miller, J. P. 1964 Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. 522 pp.
Nanson, G. C. 1977 Channel migration, floodplain formation, and vegetation succession on a meandering-river floodplain in N.E. British Columbia, Canada. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada, 349 pp.
Nanson, G. C. & Hickin, E. J. 1983 Channel migration and incision on the Beatton River. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 109, 327–337.Google Scholar
Nayfeh, A. 1973 Perturbation Methods. John Wiley.
Odgaard, A. J. 1981 Transverse bed slope in alluvial channel bends. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 107, 1677–1694.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1982 Stability of the channel of the Minnesota River near State Bridge No. 93, Minnesota. Project Report No. 205, St Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, USA, 33 pp.
Parker, G., Sawai, K. & Ikeda, S. 1982 Bend theory of river meanders. Part 2. Nonlinear deformation of finite-amplitude bends. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 303–314.Google Scholar
Parker, G., Diplas, P. & Akiyama, J. 1983 Meander bends of high amplitude. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 109, 00–00.Google Scholar
Reid, J. B. 1983 Artificially-induced concave bank deposition as a means of floodplain erosion control. Proceedings, Rivers, 83 Specialty Conference on River Meandering, ASCE, October 24–26, New Orleans, USA.
Smith, J. D. & Mclean, S. R. 1985 A model for meandering streams. Water Resources Res. (In the Press.)
Woodyer, K. D. 1975 Concave-bank benches on the Barwon River, New South Wales. Austral. Geographer 13, 36–40.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C. & Kennedy, J. F. 1978 Transverse bed slopes in curved alluvial channels. J.Hydraul. Div. ASCE 104, 33–48.Google Scholar