Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-qdphv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-01T17:14:33.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A zonal and regime-based generalised Reynolds analogy for compressible Couette–Poiseuille flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2025

Jiaxing Yang
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, PR China State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, PR China
Hongyu Ma
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, PR China State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, PR China
Fei Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, PR China
Wan Cheng*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, PR China State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, PR China
Xisheng Luo*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, PR China State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, PR China
*
Corresponding authors: Wan Cheng, wancheng@ustc.edu.cn; Xisheng Luo, xluo@ustc.edu.cn
Corresponding authors: Wan Cheng, wancheng@ustc.edu.cn; Xisheng Luo, xluo@ustc.edu.cn

Abstract

To address the limitation of the generalised Reynolds analogy (GRA) in handling flows with a spatial mismatch between velocity and temperature extrema, we propose a zonal and regime-based GRA which integrates a zonal decomposition approach based on the extrema of velocity and temperature profiles with a regime-based approach that accounts for different temperature–velocity (T–V) relations. The new GRA is verified using compressible turbulent Couette–Poiseuille (C–P) flow, which occurs between two plane plates driven by the combination of relative moving walls and the application of a pressure gradient. Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are implemented at ${\textit{Re}}_0 = 4000$, $\textit{Ma}_0 = 0.8$ and $1.5$. Two flow regimes are recognised: one is the Couette regime (C regime), featuring opposite-direction wall frictions on the bottom and top walls, and the other is the Poiseuille regime (P regime), characterised by same-direction wall frictions. For C-regime flow, the temperature maximum point and the minimum magnitude point of the velocity gradient divide the entire channel into three zones, with each zone modelled via canonical GRA. For P-regime flow, the velocity maximum point presents a strong singularity for canonical GRA. We propose a new set of T–V relations with non-uniform distribution of the effective Prandtl number (${\textit{Pr}}_e$) rather than the typical constant-${\textit{Pr}}_e$ assumption. Comparisons with DNS results indicate that the new T–V relation improves the prediction of temperature profile in compressible C–P turbulence, particularly for the two P-regime flows with higher $\textit{Ma}_0$, where the original GRA model shows clear deviations from the DNS.

Information

Type
JFM Rapids
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chen, X., Gan, J. & Fu, L. 2025 Mean temperature–velocity relation and a new temperature wall model for compressible laminar and turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1009, A39.10.1017/jfm.2025.312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C. & Fu, L. 2024 A Reynolds analogy model for compressible wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 999, A20.10.1017/jfm.2024.981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Pullin, D.I., Samtaney, R. & Luo, X. 2023 Numerical simulation of turbulent, plane parallel Couette–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 955, A4.10.1017/jfm.2022.1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, G.N., Kim, J. & Moser, R.D. 1995 A numerical study of turbulent supersonic isothermal-wall channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 305, 159183.10.1017/S0022112095004587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, L. & Martin, M.P. 2011 Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 4. Effect of high enthalpy. J. Fluid Mech. 684, 2559.10.1017/jfm.2011.252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foysi, H., Sarkar, S. & Sarkar, R. 2004 Compressibility effects and turbulence scalings in supersonic channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 509, 207216.10.1017/S0022112004009371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, L., Karp, M., Bose, S.T., Moin, P. & Urzay, J. 2021 Shock-induced heating and transition to turbulence in a hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 909, A8.10.1017/jfm.2020.935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, P.G., Coleman, G.N., Spalart, P.R. & Yang, X.I.A. 2023 Velocity and temperature scalings leading to compressible laws of the wall. J. Fluid Mech. 977, A49.10.1017/jfm.2023.1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusher, D.J. & Coleman, G.N. 2022 Numerical study of compressible wall-bounded turbulence - the effect of thermal wall conditions on the turbulent Prandtl number in the low-supersonic regime. Intl J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36 (9), 797815.10.1080/10618562.2023.2189247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesti, D. & Pirozzoli, S. 2019 Direct numerical simulation of supersonic pipe flow at moderate Reynolds number. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 76, 100112.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. 2011 Stabilized non-dissipative approximations of Euler equations in generalized curvilinear coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (8), 29973014.10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. & Bernardini, M. 2011 Turbulence in supersonic boundary layers at moderate reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 120168.10.1017/jfm.2011.368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trettel, A. & Larsson, J. 2016 Mean velocity scaling for compressible wall turbulence with heat transfer. Phys. Fluids 28 (2), 026102.10.1063/1.4942022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Driest, E.R. 1951 Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids. J. Aeronaut. Sci 18 (3), 145160.10.2514/8.1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walz, A. 1962 Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers. CNRS.Google Scholar
Yao, J. & Hussain, F. 2020 Turbulence statistics and coherent structures in compressible channel flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (8), 084603.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.084603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J. & Hussain, F. 2023 Study of compressible turbulent plane Couette flows via direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 964, A29.10.1017/jfm.2023.359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Song, Y. & Xia, Z. 2024 Direct numerical simulations of compressible turbulent channel flows with asymmetric thermal walls. J. Fluid Mech. 984, A37.10.1017/jfm.2024.226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.S., Bi, W.T., Hussain, F. & She, Z.S. 2014 A generalized Reynolds analogy for compressible wall-bounded turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 739, 392420.10.1017/jfm.2013.620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., Zhang, P., Yang, X., Ji, Y. & Xia, Z. 2025 A unified framework for mean temperature analysis in compressible turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1012, R2.10.1017/jfm.2025.10173CrossRefGoogle Scholar