Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T14:30:22.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional turbulence with two-point closure: the effects of intermittency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

J. R. Herring  and
J. C. McWilliams
J. R. Herring
Affiliation:
Geophysical Turbulence Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307
J. C. McWilliams
Affiliation:
Geophysical Turbulence Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compare results of high-resolution direct numerical simulation with equivalent two-point moment closure (the test-field model) for both randomly forced and spin-down problems. Our results indicate that moment closure is an adequate representation of observed spectra only if the random forcing is sufficiently strong to disrupt the dynamical tendency to form intermittent isolated vortices. For strong white-noise forcing near a lower-wavenumber cut-off, theory and simulation are in good agreement except in the dissipation range, with an enstrophy range less steep than the wavenumber to the minus fourth power. If the forcing is weak in amplitude, red noise, and at large wavenumbers, significant errors are made by the closure, particularly in the inverse-cascade range. For spin-down problems at large Reynolds numbers, the closure considerably overestimates enstrophy transfer to small scales, as well as energy transfer to large scales. We finally discuss the possibility that the closure errors are related to intermittency of various types. Intermittency can occur in either the inverse-cascade range (forced equilibrium) or the intermediate scales (spin-down), with isolated concentrations of vorticity forming the associated coherent structures, or it can occur in the dissipation range owing to the nonlinear amplification of variations in the cascade rate (Kraichnan 1967).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 153 , April 1985 , pp. 229 - 242
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basedevant, C., Legras, B., Sardourny, R. & Beland, B. 1981 A study of barotropic model flows: intermittency, waves and predictability. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2305.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. E. & Sulem, P.-L. 1984 Direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional turbulence. In Proc. 4th Beer Sheva Seminar on MHD flows and Turbulence.
Fornberg, B. 1977 A numerical study of 2-d turbulence. J. Comp. Phys. 25, 1.Google Scholar
Frisch, U. & Morf, R. 1981 Intermittency in nonlinear dynamics and singularities for complex times. Phys. Rev. A 23, 2673.Google Scholar
Frisch, U. & Sulem, P.-L. 1984 Numerical simulation of the inverse cascade in two-dimensional turbulence. Preprint.
Haidvogel, D. B. 1984 Particle dispersal and Lagrangian vorticity conservation in models of beta-plane turbulence. In preparation.
Herring, J. R., Orszag, S. A., Kraichnan, R. H. & Fox, D. G. 1974 Decay of two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 417–466.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. & Kraichnan, R. H. 1979 A numerical comparison of velocity-based and strain-based Lagrangian-history turbulence approximations. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 581–597.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. 1984 Contrary roles of planetary wave propagation in atmospheric predictability. In Proc. La Jolla Inst. Workshop on Predictability of Fluid Flows (ed. G. Holloway & B. West), pp. 593–600. New York: AIP.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1965 Lagrangian-history closure for turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8, 575.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1967 Intermittency in the very small scales of turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10, 2080–2082.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1971 An almost-Markovian Galilean-invariant turbulence model, J. Fluid Mech. 47, 513–524.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1975 Statistical dynamics of two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 155–175.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1969 Numerical simulation of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids Suppl. II 12, 240–249.Google Scholar
Mcwilliams, J. C. 1984a The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow. In Proc. La Jolla Inst. Workshop on Predictability of Fluid Flows (ed. G. Holloway & B. West), pp. 205–221. New York: AIP.
Mcwilliams, J. C. 1984b The emergence of isolated, coherent vortices in turbulent flow. J. Fluid solution in a β-plane channel. J. Phys. Oceanogr 11, 921–949.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1974 Statistical theory of turbulence. In Proc. 1973 Les Houches Summer School (ed. R. Balian & J.-L. Peaube), p. 237. Gordon & Breach.
Siggia, E. D. & Aref, H. 1981 Point vortex simulation of the inverse cascade in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 24, 171–173.Google Scholar