Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-229nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-09T23:34:54.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short communication: New data support phylogeographic patterns in a marine parasite Tristriata anatis (Digenea: Notocotylidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2019

Anna Gonchar Open the ORCID record for Anna Gonchar [Opens in a new window]  and
Kirill V. Galaktionov Open the ORCID record for Kirill V. Galaktionov [Opens in a new window]
Anna Gonchar*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7/9, St Petersburg 199034, Russia Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, St Petersburg 199034, Russia
Kirill V. Galaktionov
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7/9, St Petersburg 199034, Russia Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, St Petersburg 199034, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: Anna Gonchar, E-mail: anya.gonchar@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intraspecific diversity in parasites with heteroxenous life cycles is guided by reproduction mode, host vagility and dispersal, transmission features and many other factors. Studies of these factors in Digenea have highlighted several important patterns. However, little is known about intraspecific variation for digeneans in the marine Arctic ecosystems. Here we analyse an extended dataset of partial cox1 and nadh1 sequences for Tristriata anatis (Notocotylidae) and confirm the preliminary findings on its distribution across Eurasia. Haplotypes are not shared between Europe and the North Pacific, suggesting a lack of current connection between these populations. Periwinkle distribution and anatid migration routes are consistent with such a structure of haplotype network. The North Pacific population appears ancestral, with later expansion of T. anatis to the North Atlantic. Here the parasite circulates widely, but the direction of haplotype transfer from the north-east to the south-west is more likely than the opposite. In the eastern Barents Sea, the local transmission hotspot is favoured.

Keywords

DigeneaNotocotylidaeTristriata anatistwo-host life cycleintraspecific diversitygeographic diversityphylogeographypopulation structurehaplotype networkcox1nadh1

Information

Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 94 , 2020 , e79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Able, KP, Barron, A, Dunn, JL, Omland, K and Sansone, L (2014) First occurrence of an Atlantic common eider (Somateria mollissima dresseri) in the Pacific Ocean. Western Birds 45(2), 90–99.Google Scholar
Alexander, A, Steel, D, Hoekzema, K, Mesnick, SL, Engelhaupt, D, Kerr, I, Payne, R and Baker, CS (2016) What influences the worldwide genetic structure of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus)? Molecular Ecology 25, 2754–2772.Google Scholar
Anker-Nilssen, T, Bakken, V, Strøm, H, Golovkin, AN, Bianki, VV and Tatarinkova, IP (Eds) (2000) The status of marine birds breeding in the Barents Sea region. Vol. 113, 213 pp. Tromsø, Norsk Polarinstitutt Rapportserie.Google Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I and Poulin, R (2013) Host traits explain the genetic structure of parasites: a meta-analysis. Parasitology 140(10), 1316–1322.Google Scholar
Blasco-Costa, I, Waters, JM and Poulin, R (2012) Swimming against the current: genetic structure, host mobility and the drift paradox in trematode parasites. Molecular Ecology 21(1), 207–217.Google Scholar
Bowles, J, Hope, M, Tiu, WU, Liu, X and McManus, DP (1993) Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers highly conserved between Chinese and Philippine Schistosoma japonicum. Acta Tropica 55, 217–229.Google Scholar
Bustnes, JO and Erikstad, KE (1988) The diets of sympatric wintering populations of Common Eider Somateria mollissima and King Eider S. spectabilis in Northern Norway. Omis Fennica 65, 163–1168.Google Scholar
Bustnes, JO and Systad, GH (2001) Comparative feeding ecology of Steller's eiders Polysticta stelleri and long-tailed ducks Clangula hyemalis in winter. Waterbirds 24, 407–412.Google Scholar
Bustnes, JO, Mosbech, A, Sonne, C and Systad, GH (2010) Migration patterns, breeding and moulting locations of king eiders wintering in northeastern Norway. Polar Biology 33, 1379–1385.Google Scholar
Cole, R and Viney, M (2018) The population genetics of parasitic nematodes of wild animals. Parasites & Vectors 11, 590.Google Scholar
Crandall, KA and Templeton, AR (1993) Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction. Genetics 134(3), 959–969.Google Scholar
Criscione, CD and Blouin, MS (2004) Life cycles shape parasite evolution: comparative population genetics of salmon trematodes. Evolution 58(1), 198–202.Google Scholar
Criscione, CD, Poulin, R and Blouin, MS (2005) Molecular ecology of parasites: elucidating ecological and microevolutionary processes. Molecular Ecology 14(8), 2247–2257.Google Scholar
Dau, CP, Flint, PL and Petersen, MR (2000) Distribution of recoveries of Steller's Eiders banded on the lower Alaska Peninsula, Alaska. Journal of Field Ornithology 71(3), 541–548.Google Scholar
Duran, S, Giribet, G and Turon, X (2004) Phylogeographical history of the sponge Crambe crambe (Porifera, Poecilosclerida): range expansion and recent invasion of the Macaronesian islands from the Mediterranean Sea. Molecular ecology 13(1), 109–122.Google Scholar
Enabulele, EE, Awharitoma, AO, Lawton, SP and Kirk, RS (2018) First molecular identification of an agent of diplostomiasis, Diplostomum pseudospathaceum (Niewiadomska 1984) in the United Kingdom and its genetic relationship with populations in Europe. Acta Parasitologica 63(3), 444–453.Google Scholar
Esch, GW, Kennedy, CR, Bush, AO and Aho, JM (1988) Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization. Parasitology 96, 519–532.Google Scholar
Excoffier, L and Lischer, HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10, 564–567.Google Scholar
Galaktionov, KV (2017) Patterns and processes influencing helminth parasites of Arctic coastal communities during climate change. Journal of Helminthology 91(4), 387–408.Google Scholar
Galaktionov, KV, Nikolaev, KE, Aristov, DA, Levakin, IA and Kozminsky, EV (2018) Parasites on the edge: patterns of trematode transmission in the Arctic intertidal at the Pechora Sea (South-Eastern Barents Sea). Polar Biology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2413-3Google Scholar
Gonchar, A and Galaktionov, KV (2017) Life cycle and biology of Tristriata anatis (Digenea: Notocotylidae): Morphological and molecular approaches. Parasitology Research 116(1), 45–59.Google Scholar
Gonchar, A, Jouet, D, Skírnisson, K, Krupenko, D and Galaktionov, KV (2019) Transatlantic discovery of Notocotylus atlanticus (Digenea: Notocotylidae) based on life cycle data. Parasitology Research 118(5), 1445–1456.Google Scholar
Huyse, T, Poulin, R and Theron, A (2005) Speciation in parasites: a population genetics approach. Trends in Parasitology 21(10), 469–475.Google Scholar
Keeney, DB, King, TM, Rowe, DL and Poulin, R (2009) Contrasting mtDNA diversity and population structure in a direct-developing marine gastropod and its trematode parasites. Molecular Ecology 18(22), 4591–4603.Google Scholar
Krasnov, YV, Ezhov, AV, Galaktionov, KV and Shavykin, AA (2019) Size and seasonal distribution of the western population of the King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) in Russian northern seas. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal (in press) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Leigh, JW and Bryant, D (2015) PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6(9), 1110–1116.Google Scholar
Louhi, KR, Karvonen, A, Rellstab, C and Jokela, J (2010) Is the population genetic structure of complex life cycle parasites determined by the geographic range of the most motile host? Infection, Genetics and Evolution 10(8), 1271–1277.Google Scholar
Mazé-Guilmo, E, Blanchet, S, McCoy, KD and Loot, G (2016) Host dispersal as the driver of parasite genetic structure: a paradigm lost? Ecology Letters 19(3), 336–347.Google Scholar
Miura, O, Torchin, ME, Bermingham, E, Jacobs, DK and Hechinger, RF (2011) Flying shells: historical dispersal of marine snails across Central America. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279(1731), 1061–1067.Google Scholar
Nadler, SA (1995) Microevolution and the genetic structure of parasite populations. The Journal of Parasitology 81(3), 395–403.Google Scholar
Prugnolle, F, Théron, A, Pointier, JP, Jabbour-Zahab, R, Jarne, P, Durand, P and Meeûs, TD (2005) Dispersal in a parasitic worm and its two hosts: consequence for local adaptation. Evolution 59, 296–303.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 31 July 2019).Google Scholar
Reid, DG (1996) Systematics and evolution of Littorina. 463 pp. London, The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Rozas, J, Ferrer-Mata, A, Sánchez-DelBarrio, JC, Guirao-Rico, S, Librado, P, Ramos-Onsins, SE and Sánchez-Gracia, A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34, 3299–3302.Google Scholar
Vázquez-Prieto, S, Vilas, R, Paniagua, E and Ubeira, FM (2015) Influence of life history traits on the population genetic structure of parasitic helminths: a minireview. Folia Parasitologica 62, 060.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gonchar and Galaktionov supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Gonchar and Galaktionov supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 430.5 KB