Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-v47t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T19:19:12.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

A. Grant Jordan
A. Grant Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines three distinct images of the policy process. Iron triangles emphasiże stable relations among a limited number of participants in a relatively closed policy area. Issue networks are fragmented, open and extraordinarily complex and are ill-structured for resolving conflicts and reaching authoritative decisions. The neo-corporatist literature posits a mechanistic interpretation of society: hierarchy, discipline, command and stability, though organized through sectors. These three images can be contrasted with an image of cabinet government which stresses the integrative capacities of central government. The United States can be seen to have moved to some degree from a pattern more closely captured by the iron triangle image to a looser, more complex one resembling features of the issue network image. In Britain, it is possible to detect some movement towards the complexity of the issue network approach. Despite some superficial plausibility, the corporatist image does not apply to Britain, which is best described by drawing on elements of the iron triangle and cabinet government images and some of the complexity of the issue network image. Finally, limits to the fragmentation implied by the issue network image are noted.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 95 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, Lord (1976) In Lethbridge, D. (ed.) Government and Industry Relationships. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Beer, S. (1980), British pressure groups revisited: pluralistic stagnation from the fifties to the seventies, Public Administration Bulletin, no. 32, 04 1980, 5–16.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life.Google Scholar
Lord, Boyle (1980) Ministers and the administrative process, Public Administration, 58, 1–12.Google Scholar
Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. (1961) The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Butski, J. and Johansen, L. (1979) Variations in organisational participation in government, Scandinavian Political Studies, 3, 196–200.Google Scholar
Cater, D. (1964) Power in Washington. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Castle, B. (1973) The loneliness of the short distance runner, Sunday Times, 10 06 1973, p. 17.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1975) Pluralism, corporatism and the role of the state, Government and Opposition, 178–98.Google Scholar
Christoph, J. B. (1975) High civil servants and the politics of conservatism in Great Britain. In Dugan, M. (ed.) The Mandarins of Western Europe. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sir R. (1971) New Trends in Government. Civil Service College Studies, no. 1. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Lord, Croham (1978) The developing structure of United Kingdom government, Management Services in Government, 33, No. 41, 105–13.Google Scholar
Crossman, R. (1975–1977) The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Vols. I–II. London: Hamish Hamilton and Cape.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1971) The Politics of Industrial Relations. London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. and Thoenig, J. C. (1976) The regulation of complex organised systems, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. L. (1979) Legislative reform and the decline of presidential influence on Capitol Hill, British Journal of Political Science, 9, 465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, E. (1974) Political Responsibility and Industry. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Dell, E. (1980) Some reflections on cabinet government by a former practitioner, Public Administration Bulletin, No. 32, 04 1980, p. 17–33.Google Scholar
Fusfeld, D. R. (1972) The rise of the corporate state in America, Journal of Economic Issues, 6, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. Leiper (1965) The Political Process. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Friend, J. K., Power, J. H. and Yewlett, C. J. L. (1974) Public Planning: The Inter-Corporate Dimension. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Fritschler, A. L. (1975) Smoking and Politics. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. S. (1979) The Impasse of Democracy. New York: Hamilton-Hilton.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J. (1980) Pluralism and Corporatism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Heath, E. (1978) Heath on Whitehall reform (talking to A. Barker), Parliamentary Affairs, 31, 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978) Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (ed.) (1978).Google Scholar
Heisler, M. O. (1979) Corporate pluralism revisited. Where is the theory?, Scandinavian Political Studies, 2 (new series), 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, D. (1975) A Tax Shall be Charged. London. HMSO.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. G. (1978) Central coordination, Crossman and the inner cabinet, Political Quarterly, 49, no. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. G. and Richardson, J. J. (1979) Pantouflage: a civil service perk, New Society, 47, 415–16.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. (1970) How to be a Minister. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
King, A. (1976) Why is Britain Becoming Harder to Govern? London: BBC.Google Scholar
King, A. (ed.) (1978) The New American Political System. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. (1964) How the farmers get what they want, Reporter, 21 05, 35ff.Google Scholar
Marsh, Sir R. (1978) Off the Rails. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
McConnell, G. (1966) Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Milward, H. B. and Francisco, R. A. (1980) Interorganisational policy making and corporatism in the United States. Paper delivered at APSA, Aug. 1980.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, L. and W., McQuillan (1979) Corporatism or industrial democracy, Political Studies, 27, 266–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlemass, R. K. (1979) Politics in Industrial Society: The Experience of British Society since 1911. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Neustadt, R. (1980) Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership, 3rd edition. New York.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. E. and Winkler, J. T. (1975) The coming corporatism, Challenge, 03/04, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, M. (1980) Whitehall and roads: A case study of sectoral politics, Policy and Politics, 8, 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, V. C. (1974) The corporate state, economic performance and social policy, Journal of Economic Issues, 8, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. (1979) Complex Organisations (2nd edition). Glenview, III.: Scott, Foresman and Co.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. (1963) Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1980) Analysing intergovernmental relations, European Journal of Political Research, 8, 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. J. and Jordan, A. G. (1979) Governing Under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. and Stringer, J. (1980) Policy style and policy community. Paper at ECPR workshop on Interest Groups and Government, March 1980, Florence.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1980) Government against subgovernments. In Rose, R. and Suleiman, E. (eds.) Presidents and Prime Ministers. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R. H. (1979) Why no corporatism in America? In Schmitter and Lehmbruch (1979).Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1974) Still the century of corporatism?, Review of Politics, 36, 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. F. (1979) The Politics of the Corporate Economy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Tricker, R. I. (1977) The Individual, the Enterprise and the State. London: Associated Business Programmes Ltd.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. (1977) The Limits of Legitimacy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar