Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-v47t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T16:30:49.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experience with extracorporeal radiotherapy in intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm of bone tumour: a case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2025

Ayşegül Ünal Karabey*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Hospital, İzmit, Turkey
Nermin Mirzezade
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Hospital, İzmit, Turkey
Berna Tırpancı
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Hospital, İzmit, Turkey
Gülşah Özkan
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Hospital, İzmit, Turkey
Görkem Aksu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Hospital, İzmit, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Ayşegül Ünal Karabey; Email: karabeyaysegul@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

This report discusses a 28-year-old male patient diagnosed with an intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm in the distal diaphysis of the right femur. The tumour was excised, irradiated extracorporeally and re-implanted, demonstrating the procedure’s feasibility and effectiveness of this approach.

Case Presentation:

A 28-year-old male patient presented with complaints of claudication. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lytic lesion measuring 65 × 40 × 91 mm in the distal diaphysis of the right femur. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography evaluation identified a malignant lytic lesion in the right femur without evidence of distant metastasis. Preoperative imaging suggested malignancy. The bone segment was excised, irradiated with 50 Gy in a single fraction and re-implanted. The patient underwent open reduction, internal fixation and deep soft tissue tumour excision. Histopathology confirmed intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm without angio invasion or perineural invasion. Immunohistochemistry was positive for Pansitokeratin, Vimentin, Cytokeratin-7, D2-40 and CD31 and negative for CD34.

Results:

Postoperatively, the bone segment was successfully re-implanted and fixed with metal hardware. Follow-up imaging over thirty months showed successful integration with no local recurrence or metastasis. The patient recovered well without significant complications.

Recommendations:

Extracorporeal radiotherapy is a viable technique for treating intermediate-grade vascular bone neoplasms, providing effective tumour control and preserving limb function. This approach could be considered for broader clinical application.

Type
Case Study
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Extracorporeal radiotherapy (ECRT) involves the surgical removal of a bone segment containing a tumour, its irradiation outside the body and subsequent re-implantation. This technique is particularly valuable for limb salvage in bone tumours, offering an alternative to amputation or extensive resections, which can significantly impact the patient’s quality of life. Reference Hong, Millington and Ahern1

Intermediate-grade vascular neoplasms of the bone are rare and challenging to treat. Traditional treatments often involve aggressive surgeries, which can lead to substantial morbidity. ECRT has emerged as a promising technique, combining effective oncologic control with limb preservation. This method leverages the high radiation sensitivity of tumour cells while maintaining the structural integrity of the bone, thus allowing re-implantation and functional recovery. Reference Oshima, Yoshida and Hiruma2

Recent studies and case series have documented the success of ECRT in various bone tumours. The technique has shown favourable outcomes in terms of tumour control, functional recovery and complication rates. Reference Krieg, Davidson and Stalley3 This report presents a case of an intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm treated with ECRT, highlighting its potential as an effective limb-salvage strategy.

Case Presentation

A 28-year-old male patient presented with complaints of mass and claudication. MR imaging revealed a lytic lesion measuring 65 × 40 × 91 mm in the distal diaphysis of the right femur. The lesion was destructive and suspected to be malignant. Surgical excision and intraoperative radiotherapy were planned. After surgical excision, extracorporeal radiotherapy was administered, followed by re-implantation of the treated bone (Figure 1). The patient underwent open reduction, plate/screw fixation, deep soft tissue tumour excision and osteotomy. The excised bone structure was immediately re-implanted as a biological graft after radiotherapy. Postoperative histopathological analysis confirmed intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm without angioinvasion or perineural invasion.

Figure 1. Preoperative and intraoperative images. (A) Preoperative imaging of the right femur for treatment planning system. (B) Setup for extracorporeal irradiation. (C) Intraoperative view of the excised bone segment.

Preoperative Assessment

Preoperative imaging, including computed tomography (CT) and planar X-ray images, confirmed the size and location of the tumour (Figure 2). Patient consent form was obtained. The resected bone segment was planned for extracorporeal radiotherapy to mitigate the risk of local recurrence, regional lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. Reference Nakamura, Abudu and Grimer4

Figure 2. Preoperative CT and X-ray and postoperative images. (A) Preoperative imaging of the right femur showing the extent of the tumour, (B) preoperative CT images of the right femur and (C) postoperative imaging of right femur.

Methods

The bone segment was removed and sterilised. Simulations using Siemens Definition AS CT scanner and Eclipse V13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto USA) treatment planning software were performed to ensure precise radiation delivery. The bone-equivalent material, measuring 25 × 38 cm, was wrapped in a 2 cm bolus and a planning tomography was performed. The bone-equivalent material was contoured as the CTV. A treatment plan was created using a 40 × 40 cm field with 6FFF MV X-ray energy at gantry angles of 270° and 90°. The treatment plan was executed on a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator in a single fraction of 50 Gy (Figure 3).

Figure 3. TPS isodose distribution. TPS isodose distribution is observed in (A) transverse, (B) coronal and (C) Sagital planes.

Results

Following irradiation, the bone segment was re-implanted and fixated with metal hardware (Figure 2). Reference Oshima, Yoshida and Hiruma2 Histopathological examination revealed an intermediate-grade vascular neoplasm with no angioinvasion or perineural invasion. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive reactions for Pansitokeratin, FL1, Vimentin, Cytokeratin-7, D2-40 and CD31, but negative for CD34.

Follow-Up

Follow-up imaging over thirty months showed successful integration of the irradiated bone with no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis (Figure 4). The patient experienced a satisfactory recovery with no significant complications. Acute and late side effects were not observed postoperatively or during post-radiotherapy follow-ups. There were no movement restrictions noted upon physical examination.

Figure 4. Follow-up imaging at 4, 12 and 30 months. (A) Follow-up planar X-ray image at 4 months post-operation, (B) follow-up planar X-ray image at 12 months post-operation and (C) follow-up planar X-ray image at 30 months post-operation.

Discussion

ECRT has been successfully used in various bone tumours, demonstrating its effectiveness as a limb-salvage technique. In our case, the procedure provided excellent local control with no recurrence over a thirty-month follow-up period. The irradiation dose of 50 Gy in a single fraction was effective in eradicating the tumour cells while preserving the bone structure. Reference Nakamura, Abudu and Grimer4

Studies have shown that ECRT can achieve similar oncologic outcomes to more radical surgeries, such as amputation, but with significantly better functional results. This technique allows for the preservation of the limb and its function, which is particularly important for young patients with long life expectancies and high functional demands. Reference Tavanaiepour, Broaddus and Chung5

The primary advantage of ECRT is its ability to provide high-dose radiation to the tumour while sparing surrounding healthy tissues. This targeted approach reduces the risk of radiation-induced damage to adjacent structures, which is a significant concern in conventional radiotherapy. Reference Kawaguchi, Ahmed and Matsumoto6

However, the technique is not without challenges. The surgical complexity of removing and re-implanting a bone segment, potential complications such as infection or non-union and the need for specialised equipment and expertise are significant considerations. Reference Gunaseelan, Patro and Lal7 Despite these challenges, the outcomes of our case and others in the literature suggest that ECRT is a viable and effective option for select patients.

Recommendations

Further studies are warranted to standardise protocols, optimise dosimetry and confirm long-term outcomes of ECRT. As more data become available, this technique could become a standard part of the limb-salvage armamentarium for treating bone tumours. Reference Ağaoğlu8

Extracorporeal radiotherapy for intermediate-grade vascular bone neoplasm is a viable limb-salvage technique, providing effective tumour control with acceptable morbidity. Our case demonstrates the potential of ECRT to preserve limb function and ensure oncologic safety. Further research and standardised protocols will enhance the applicability of this technique, potentially making it a preferred option for treating similar bone tumours.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Radiation Oncology at Kocaeli University for their support in this study. This manuscript was presented as a poster presentation at the 15th National Radiation Oncology Congress in Antalya on 06-10/12/2023.

Financial support

None.

Competing interests

None.

References

Hong, S, Millington, V, Ahern, G, et al. (2012) Extracorporeal RadiationTherapy as Part of theLimb Salvage Management: A Review of 99 Cases. Volume 84 Number 3S Supplement. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, A, Yoshida, D, Hiruma, T, et al. Intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation for giant sarcoma infiltrated calvarium: a case report. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37: 17421745. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1888875 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krieg, AH, Davidson, AW, Stalley, PD Intercalary femoral reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiated autogenous bone graft in limb-salvage surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 2007; 89: 366371. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18508 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, T, Abudu, A, Grimer, RJ, et al. The clinical outcomes of extracorporeal irradiated and re-implanted cemented autologous bone graft of femoral diaphysis after tumour resection. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 647651. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1715-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavanaiepour, D, Broaddus, WC, Chung, TD, et al. Extracorporeal irradiation of tumourou scalvaria: a case series. J Neurosurg 2015; 122: 11271130. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS131383 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawaguchi, N, Ahmed, AR, Matsumoto, S, et al. The concept of curative margin in surgery for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 419: 165172. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunaseelan, K, Patro, DK, Lal, A, et. al Efficacy of extracorporeal irradiation in primary malignant bone tumours: a tertiary cancer centre experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Care 2019; 4 (2): 5357. doi: 10.31557/APJCC.2019.4.2.53 Google Scholar
Ağaoğlu, FY, Özmen V: Extracorporeal radiotherapy in bone tumors: current perspectives and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 95: 827835. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.003.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Preoperative and intraoperative images. (A) Preoperative imaging of the right femur for treatment planning system. (B) Setup for extracorporeal irradiation. (C) Intraoperative view of the excised bone segment.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Preoperative CT and X-ray and postoperative images. (A) Preoperative imaging of the right femur showing the extent of the tumour, (B) preoperative CT images of the right femur and (C) postoperative imaging of right femur.

Figure 2

Figure 3. TPS isodose distribution. TPS isodose distribution is observed in (A) transverse, (B) coronal and (C) Sagital planes.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Follow-up imaging at 4, 12 and 30 months. (A) Follow-up planar X-ray image at 4 months post-operation, (B) follow-up planar X-ray image at 12 months post-operation and (C) follow-up planar X-ray image at 30 months post-operation.