Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vpjdr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T21:36:06.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollinators, pollination efficiency and fruiting success in a wild nutmeg, Myristica dactyloides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

Manju V. Sharma  and
Kundaranahalli R. Shivanna
Manju V. Sharma*
Affiliation:
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India, and Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
Kundaranahalli R. Shivanna
Affiliation:
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India, and Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
*
1Corresponding author. Email: msharma@ic.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We investigated the pollinator assemblage in Myristica dactyloides, a dioecious tree species occupying the intermediate canopy stratum of the mid- and high-elevation wet evergreen forests and endemic to Sri Lanka and the Western Ghats of India. We surveyed two populations and, in one of them, marked four male and three female trees for observations on floral display and insect foraging, and two female trees for experimental pollination. Yellow sticky traps were used to sample insects in the canopy during the flowering season of December 2007 in addition to direct observations of insect activity in 2006. Myristicaceae members from other tropical areas have been reported to be specialized to beetle pollination, but our observations provide evidence of a generalist pollination system in M. dactyloides, composed of small, diverse insects: thysanopterans (thrips), coleopterans (beetles), halictid bees and dipterans (syrphid and phorid flies). Quantifying floral display, we found that female inflorescences were smaller, offered no reward and attracted significantly fewer pollinators in comparison to male inflorescences. Fruit set was low and could be attributed to a 29% flower abscission and abortion of young fruits, but a reasonably high natural pollination efficiency combined with pollination experiments established that there was no pollination limitation in the study population.

Keywords

canopyColeopteradioecyDipteraendemicflower abscissiongeneralist pollinationMyristicaceaeThysanopteraWestern Ghatswet evergreen

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 405 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

LITERATURE CITED

APPANAH, S. & CHAN, H. T. 1981. Thrips: the pollinators of some dipterocarps. Malaysian Forester 44:234–252.Google Scholar
ARMSTRONG, J. E. 1997. Pollination by deceit in nutmeg (Myristica insipida, Myristicaceae): floral displays and beetle activity at male and female trees. American Journal of Botany 84:1266–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ARMSTRONG, J. E. & DRUMMOND, B. A. 1986. Floral biology of Myristica fragrans Houtt. (Myristicaceae), the nutmeg of commerce. Biotropica 18:32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARMSTRONG, J. E. & IRVINE, A. K. 1989a. Floral biology of Myristica insipida (Myristicaceae), a distinctive beetle pollination syndrome. American Journal of Botany 76:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARMSTRONG, J. E. & IRVINE, A. K. 1989b. Flowering, sex ratios, pollen–ovule ratios, fruit set, and reproductive effort of a dioecious tree, Myristica insipida (Myristicaceae), in two different rain forest communities. American Journal of Botany 76:74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASHTON, P. S., GIVNISH, T. J. & APPANAH, S. 1988. Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. American Naturalist 132:44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BASCOMPTE, J., JORDANO, P., MELIAN, C. J. & OLENSEN, J. N. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:9383–9387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BAWA, K. S., BULLOCK, S. H., PERRY, D. R., COVILLE, R. E. & GRAYUM, M. H. 1985a. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. II. Pollination systems. American Journal of Botany 72:346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAWA, K. S., PERRY, D. R. & BEACH, J. H. 1985b. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms. American Journal of Botany 72:331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAY, D. 1995. Thermogenesis in the aroids. Aroideana 18:32–39.Google Scholar
BERNHARDT, P. 2000. Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222:293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORLETT, R. T. 2004. Flower visitors and pollination in the Oriental (Indomalayan) region. Biological Reviews 79:497–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DAFNI, A., PACINI, E. & NEPI, M. 2005. Pollen and stigma biology. Pp. 119–120 in Kevan, P. G. & Husband, B. C. (eds.). Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest Ltd., Cambridge.Google Scholar
DEVY, M. S. & GANESH, T. 2003. Canopy science and its relevance in India. Current Science 85:581–584.Google Scholar
ECKHART, V. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5:370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERVIK, F. & FEIL, J. P. 1997. Reproductive biology of the monoecious understorey palm Prestoea schultzeana in Amazonian Ecuador. Biotropica 29:309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FENSTER, C. B. & DUDASH, M. R. 2001. Spatio-temporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica. Ecology 82:844–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FENSTER, C. B, ARMBRUSTER, W. S., WILSON, P., DUDASH, M. R. & THOMSON, J. D. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLACH, M. 1966. Nutmeg cultivation and its sex problem. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 66:1–85.Google Scholar
FLOREN, A. & LINSENMAIR, K. E. 2003. How do beetle assemblages respond to anthropogenic disturbance? Pp. 190–197 in Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S. E. & Kitching, R. L. (eds.). Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
GADGIL, M. & MEHER-HOMJI, V. M. 1986. Role of protected areas in conservation. Pp. 143–149 in Chopra, V. L. & Khoshoo, T. N. (eds.). Conservation for productive agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
GIRIRAJ, A., MURTHY, M. S. R. & RAMESH, B. R. 2008. Vegetation composition, structure and patterns of diversity: a case study from the tropical wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats, India. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 65:447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIVNISH, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in Gymnosperms. Evolution 34:959–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GOLDBLATT, P., BERNHARDT, P. & MANNING, J. C. 1998. Pollination of petalloid geophytes by monkey beetles (Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae: Hopliini) in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85:215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOMEZ, J. M. & ZAMORA, R. 1999. Generalization vs. specialization in the pollination system of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Ecology 80:796–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOTTSBERGER, G. 1977. Some aspects of beetle pollination in the evolution of flowering plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 1:211–226.Google Scholar
GOTTSBERGER, G. 1988. The reproductive biology of primitive angiosperms. Taxon 37:630–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRIMALDI, D. 1999. The co-radiations of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 86:376–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESLOP-HARRISON, J. & HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1970. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technology 45:115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOWE, H. F. & WESTLEY, L. C. 1997. Ecology of pollination and seed dispersal. Pp. 262–283 in Crawley, M. J. (ed.). Plant ecology. (Second edition). Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
LÁZARO, A., LUNDGREN, R. & TOTLAND, Ø. 2009. Co-flowering neighbours influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos 118:691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MITCHELL, R. J., IRWIN, R. E., FLANAGAN, R. J. & KARRON, J. D. 2009. Ecology and evolution of plant–pollinator interactions. Annals of Botany 103:1355–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOMOSE, K. 2005. Beetle pollination in tropical rainforests. Pp. 104–110 in Roubik, D. W., Sakai, S. & Hamid, A. A. (eds.). Pollination ecology and the rainforest – Sarawak studies. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOMOSE, K., NAGAMITSU, T. & INOUE, T. 1998a. Thrips cross-pollination of Popowia pisocarpa (Annonaceae) in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Biotropica 30:444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOMOSE, K., YUMOTO, T., NAGAMITSU, T., KATO, M., NAGAMASU, H., SAKAI, S., HARRISON, R. D., ITIOKA, T., HAMID, A. A. & INOUE, T. 1998b. Pollination biology in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. I. Characteristics of the plant-pollinator community in a lowland dipterocarp forest. American Journal of Botany 85:1477–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOOG, U., FIALA, B., FEDERLE, W. & MASCHWITZ, U. 2002. Thrips pollination of the dioecious ant plant Macaranga hullettii (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia. American Journal of Botany 89:50–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PANSARIN, E. R. 2008. Reproductive biology and pollination of Govenia utriculata: a syrphid fly orchid pollinated through a pollen-deceptive mechanism. Plant Species Biology 23:90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PARTHASARATHY, N. 1999. Tree diversity and distribution in undisturbed and human-impacted sites of tropical wet evergreen forest in southern Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8:1365–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PASCAL, J. P. 1991. Floristic composition and distribution of evergreen forests in the Western Ghats, India. Palaeobotanist 39:110–126.Google Scholar
PRICE, M. V., WASER, N. M., IRWIN, R. E., CAMPBELL, D. R. & BRODY, A. K. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86:2106–2116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QUEENBOROUGH, S., BURSLEM, D. F. R. P., GARWOOD, N. C. & VALENCIA, R. 2007. Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees. American Journal of Botany 94:64–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RAMESH, B. R. 1989. Evergreen forests of the Biligiri Rangan Hills, South India – ecology, structure and floristic composition. PhD thesis, University of Madras.Google Scholar
SAKAI, S. 2001. Thrips pollination of androdioecious Castilla elastica (Moraceae) in a seasonal tropical forest. American Journal of Botany 88:1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHMID, R. 1970. Notes on the reproductive biology of Asterogyne martiana (Palmae). II. Pollination by syrphid flies. Principes 14:39–49.Google Scholar
SEYMOUR, R. & SCHULTZE-MOTEL, P. 1997. Heat-producing flowers. Endeavour 21:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOMANATHAN, H. & BORGES, R. M. 2000. Influence of exploitation on population structure, spatial distribution and reproductive success of dioecious species in a fragmented cloud forest in India. Biological Conservation 94:243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPEIGHT, M. R., INTACHAT, J., KHEN, C. V. & CHUNG, A. Y. C. 2003. Influences of forest management on insects. Pp. 380–393 in Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S. E. & Kitching, R. L. (eds.). Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
STEPHENSON, A. G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNER, I. M. 2001. The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 298 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DER GOOT, V. S. & GRABANDT, R. A. J. 1970. Some species of the genera Melanostoma, Platycheirus and Pyrophena (Diptera, Syrphidae) and their relation to flowers. Entomologische Berichten 30:135–143.Google Scholar
VAZQUEZ, D. P. & AIZEN, M. A. 2004. Asymmetric specialisation: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 85:1251–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WASER, N. M., CHITTKA, L., PRICE, M. V., WILLIAMS, N. M. & OLLERTON, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILSON, M. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113:777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLIAMS, G. A., ADAM, P. & MOUND, L. A. 2001. Thrips (Thysanoptera) pollination in Australian subtropical rainforests, with particular reference to pollination of Wilkiea huegeliana (Monimiaceae). Journal of Natural History 35:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar