Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T03:23:06.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research in language assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

Ute Knoch
Ute Knoch*
Affiliation:
Language Testing Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia uknoch@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its inception in 1990, the Language Testing Research Centre (LTRC) at the University of Melbourne has earned an international reputation for its work in the areas of language assessment and testing as well as program evaluation. The mission of the centre is: (1) to carry out and promote research and development in language testing; (2) to develop tests and other appropriate proficiency measurement instruments for English and other languages; (3) to evaluate programmes of language learning and teaching; (4) to provide consultancy services in evaluation and testing; and (5) to provide education and training in the area of language assessment.

Information

Type
Research in the news
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 138 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Australian Government Department of Health (2008). Report on the audit of health workforce in rural and regional Australia, April 2008. Canberra.Google Scholar
Blackmore, J., Gribble, C., Farrell, L., Rahimi, M., Arber, R. & Devlin, M. (2014). Australian international graduates and the transition to employment. Final report (36pp.). Melbourne, Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Elder, C. (2016). Special issue: Authenticity in LSP testing. Language Testing 33.2, 147–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C. & McNamara, T. (2016). The hunt for ‘indigenous criteria’ in assessing communication in the physiotherapy workplace. Language Testing 33.2, 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., McNamara, T., Woodward-Kron, R., Manias, E., McColl, G., Webb, G., Pill, T. & O’Hagan, S. (2013). Towards improved healthcare communication: Development and validation of language proficiency standards for non-native English speaking health professionals. Final report for the OET Centre. Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Frost, K. (2016). The dynamics of test impact in the context of Australia's skilled migration policy: Reinterpreting language constructs and scores. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloqiuim.Google Scholar
General Medical Council. (2016). List of Registered Medical Practitioners – registration statistics. www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/register/search_stats.asp.Google Scholar
Healy, G. A. & Trounson, A. (2010). Universities told to boost English programs. The Australian. www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/universities-told-to-boost-english-programs/story-e6frgcjx-122582847369.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. (1998). Science as performance: Socializing scientific discourse through conference talk rehearsals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S. & McNamara, T. (1999). Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes 18.3, 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoch, U., May, L., Macqueen, S., Pill, J. & Storch, N. (2016). Transitioning from university to the workplace: Stakeholder perceptions of academic and professional writing demands. IELTS Research Report 2016 (1). www.ielts.org/teaching-and-research/research-reports/online-series-2016-1.Google Scholar
Knoch, U., McNamara, T., Woodward-Kron, R., Elder, C., Manias, E., Flynn, E. & Zhang, B. (2015). Towards improved language assessment of written health professional communication: The case of the Occupational English Test. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment 4.2, 60–66.Google Scholar
Kunnan, A. J. (ed.) (2000). Fairness and validation in language assessment: Selected papers from the 19th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Orlando, Florida. Studies in Language Testing. Cambridge, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Macqueen, S. & Knoch, U. (2015). Evaluation of EAL online provision. Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Macqueen, S., Knoch, U., Wigglesworth, G., Nordlinger, R., McNamara, T., Green, J., Ginger, R. & Brickle, R. (2015). An investigation into the impact of NAPLAN on children in remote indigenous communities. Paper presented at the Joint conference of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Applied Linguistics Association of New Zealand and the Association for Language Testing and Assessment of Australia and New Zealand.Google Scholar
McNamara, T., Elder, C., Flynn, E., Knoch, U., Manias, E., Woodward-Kron, R. & Yahalom, S. (under review). Collaboration in the design of specific purpose language tests in the health setting. Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, J. (2011). Employer call for English fluency. The Australian.Google Scholar