Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-4ct9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-01T16:13:37.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Framework for Language Revitalization and Documentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Colleen M. Fitzgerald
Colleen M. Fitzgerald*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University—Corpus Christi
*
[colleen.fitzgerald@tamucc.edu]
Get access

Abstract

As a journal, Language has a substantial history of publishing articles about areas of linguistics now commonly identified as language documentation, revitalization, and reclamation. The significance of this vein of research is exemplified by the collection of articles published by Ken Hale and colleagues in this journal in 1992 (Hale et al. 1992). These articles present themselves as case studies of language revitalization, outlining arguments for the importance of linguistic training and assessing language vitality and diversity, all with more relevance than ever nearly three decades later. LANGUAGE REVITALIZATION AND DOCUMENTATION, a new section of the journal, will build upon the base of knowledge as a venue for peer-reviewed research articles in language revitalization and documentation. As the inaugural associate editor for this journal section, I outline a framework for the section as a starting point for submissions.

Information

Type
Language Revitalization and Documentation
Information
Language , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. e1 - e11
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, Peter K., and Sallabank, Julia. 2018. Language documentation and language revitalization: Some methodological considerations. The Routledge handbook of language revitalization, ed. by Hinton, Leanne, Huss, Leena, and Roche, Gerald, 207–15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barwick, Linda. 2005. A musicologist's wishlist: Some issues, practices and practicalities in musical aspects of language documentation. Language Documentation and Description 3. 53–62. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/035.Google Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Gawne, Lauren, Kung, Susan Smythe, Kelly, Barbara F., Heston, Tyler, Holton, Gary, Pulsifer, Peter, Beaver, David I.; et al. 2018. Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics 56(1). 1–18. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2017-0032.10.1515/ling-2017-0032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolnick, Deborah A., Smith, Rick W. A.; and Fuentes, Agustín. 2019. How academic diversity is transforming scientific knowledge in biological anthropology. American Anthropologist 121(2).464. DOI: 10.1111/aman.13212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2010. Fieldwork and the IRB: A snapshot. Language 86(4). 897–905. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2010.0048.10.1353/lan.2010.0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela. 2017. Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language description and documentation: A guide to the deposited collection and associated materials. Language Documentation & Conservation 11. 224–55. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24734.Google Scholar
Charity Hudley, Anne H., Mallinson, Christine; and Bucholtz, Mary. 2020. Toward racial justice in linguistics: Interdisciplinary insights into theorizing race in the discipline and diversifying the profession. Language 96(4). e200–e235. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0074.10.1353/lan.2020.0074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Tucker, Good, Jeff; and Mitchell, Alice. 2014. Beyond the ancestral code: Towards a model for sociolinguistic language documentation. Language Documentation & Conservation 8. 168–91. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24601.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette. 1993. Fieldwork on endangered languages: A forward look at ethical issues. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Linguists, vol. 1, 33–42. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2009. Research models, community engagement, and linguistic fieldwork: Reflections on working within Canadian Indigenous communities. Language Documentation & Conservation 3. 15–50. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4423.Google Scholar
Davis, Jenny L. 2017. Resisting rhetorics of language endangerment: Reclamation through Indigenous language survivance. Language Documentation and Description (Special issue on reclaiming languages) 14.37–58. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/151.Google Scholar
Digital Endangered Languages and Music Archiving Network (DELAMAN). 2018. Minimal checklist for the preservation of digital language documentation materials. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/55829, accessed December 12, 2020.Google Scholar
Dobrin, Lise M., and Berson, Josh. 2011. Speakers and language documentation. The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages, ed. by Austin, Peter K. and Sallabank, Julia, 187–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975981.010.Google Scholar
England, Nora C. 1992. Doing Mayan linguistics in Guatemala. Language 68(1). 29–35. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1992.0073.10.1353/lan.1992.0073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errington, Joseph. 2008. Linguistics in a colonial world: A story of language, meaning, and power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. 2017. The sounds of Indigenous language revitalization. Invited plenary address at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Austin, TX. Video recording online: https://youtu.be/wrPe_6KdoOo, accessed February 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. 2020. Understanding language documentation and revitalization as a feedback loop. Amazonian Spanish: Language contact and evolution, ed. by Fafulas, Stephen, 81–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.23.04fitCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M., and Hinson, Joshua D.. 2013. ‘Ilittibatoksali ‘We are working together‘: Perspectives on our Chickasaw tribal-academic collaboration. FEL XVII: Endangered languages beyond boundaries: Community connections, collaborative approaches, and cross-disciplinary research, ed. by Norris, Mary Jane, Anonby, Erik, Junker, Marie-Odile, Ostler, Nicholas, and Patrick, Donna, 53–60. Bath: The Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Florey, Margaret. 2018. Transforming the landscape of language revitalization work in Australia: The documenting and revitalising Indigenous languages training model. Insights from practices in community-based research: From theory to practice around the globe (Trends in linguistics 319), ed. by Bischoff, Shannon and Jany, Carmen, 314–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2018. A guide to the Syuba (Kagate) language documentation corpus. Language Documentation & Conservation 12. 204–34. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24768.Google Scholar
Haines, Casey D., Rose, Evangeline M., Odom, Karan J.; and Omland, Kevin E.. 2020. The role of diversity in science: A case study of women advancing female birdsong research. Animal Behaviour 168. 19–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.021.10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L., Craig, Colette, England, Nora, Jeanne, Laverne Masayesva, Krauss, Michael, Watahomigie, Lucille; and Yamamoto, Akira. 1992. Endangered languages. Language 68(1). 1–42. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1992.0052.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Charlotte. 2020. Methods in language documentation and description: A guide to the Kelabit documentation project. Journal of Modern Languages 30(1). 6–76. DOI: 10.22452/jml.vol30no1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A., Burge-Beckley, Tanner; and Sebok, Jacob. 2019. Language documentation in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquakes: A guide to two archives and a web exhibit. Language Documentation & Conservation 13. 618–51. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24914.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36. 161–95. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Leanne. 2001. Language revitalization: An overview. The green book of language revitalization in practice, ed. by Hinton, Leanne and Hale, Kenneth, 3–18. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004261723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Vivian, Layton, Dennis; and Prince, Sara. 2015. Diversity matters. New York: McKinsey & Company. Online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/why%20diversity%20matters/diversity%20matters.ashx, accessed May 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Kovach, Margaret. 2010. Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Langley, Bertney, Langley, Linda, Martin, Jack B.; and Hasselbacher, Stephanie. 2018. The Koasati Language Project: A collaborative, community-based language documentation and revitalization model. Insights from practices in community-based research: From theory to practice around the globe (Trends in linguistics 319), ed. by Bischoff, Shannon and Jany, Carmen, 132–50. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110527018-007.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. Producing language reclamation by decolonizing ‘language’. Language Documentation and Description (Special issue on reclaiming languages) 14.15–36. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/150.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2020. Insights from Native American Studies for theorizing race and racism in linguistics (Response to Charity Hudley, Mallinson, and Bucholtz). Language 96(4). e281–e291. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0079.10.1353/lan.2020.0079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y., and Haynes, Erin. 2010. Making ‘collaboration’ collaborative: An examination of perspectives that frame linguistic field research. Language Documentation & Conservation 4. 269–93. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4482.Google Scholar
Linn, Mary S. 2014. Living archives: A community-based language archive model. Language Documentation and Description (Special issue on language documentation and archiving) 12.53–67. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/137.Google Scholar
Leshner, Alan I. 2011. We need to reward those who nurture a diversity of ideas in science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 6, 2011. Online: http://chronicle.com/article/We-Need-to-Reward-Those-Who/126591/.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America. 1994. The need for the documentation of linguistic diversity. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/files/lsa-stmt-documentation-linguistic-diversity.pdf.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America. 2010. Resolution recognizing the scholarly merit of language documentation. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/resolution -recognizing-scholarly-merit-language-documentation.Google Scholar
Linguistic Society of America. 2018. Statement on evaluation of language documentation for hiring, tenure, and promotion. Online: https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/statement-evaluation-language-documentation-hiring-tenure-and-promotion.Google Scholar
McIvor, Onowa. 2020. Indigenous language revitalization and applied linguistics: Parallel histories, shared futures? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 40. 78–96. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190520000094.10.1017/S0267190520000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2019. The role of music in documenting phonological grammar: Two case studies from West Africa. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meeting on Phonology. DOI: 10.3765/amp.v7i0.4493.10.3765/amp.v7i0.4493.10.3765/amp.v7i0.4493.10.3765/amp.v7i0.4493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, Barbra A. 2016. Shrinking indigenous language in the Yukon. Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life, ed. by Carr, E. Summerson and Lempert, Michael, 70–88. Press Berkeley: University of California. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv9hvqvv.8.10.1515/9780520965430-006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, Ignacio L. 2020. Enabling excellence and racial justice in universities by addressing structural obstacles to work by and with people from racially minoritized communities: Response to Charity Hudley et al. Language 96(4). e236–e246. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2020.0075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. DOI: 10.17226/11153.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorate of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. 2015. Social, behavioral, and economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science. SBE Advisory Committee 2015 report. Online: https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_Research_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Mathias Wullum, Bloch, Carter Walter; and Schiebinger, Londa. 2018. Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nature Human Behavior 2. 726–34. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Meara, KerryAnn. 2011. Inside the panopticon: Studying academic reward systems. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. by Smart, John C. and Paulsen, Michael B., 161–220. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0702-3_5.10.1007/978-94-007-0702-3_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2006. Ethical issues in linguistic fieldwork: An overview. Journal of Academic Ethics 4. 123–55. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9016-2.Google Scholar
Rice, R. Eugene. 2002. Beyond Scholarship reconsidered: Toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 90. 7–18. DOI: 10.1002/tl.51.10.1002/tl.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salffner, Sophie. 2015. A guide to the Ikaan language and culture documentation. Language Documentation & Conservation 9. 237–67. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24639.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, Reynolds, Sally; and Cormier, Kearsy. 2013. Building the British Sign Language corpus. Language Documentation & Conservation 7. 136–54. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4592.Google Scholar
Shulist, Sarah, and Rice, Faun. 2019. Towards an interdisciplinary bridge between documentation and revitalization: Bringing ethnographic methods into endangered-language projects and programming. Language Documentation & Conservation 13. 36–62. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24798.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. 2nd edn. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick, Margetts, Anna, Morey, Stephen; and Musgrave, Simon. 2015. Assessing annotated corpora as research output. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36. 1.ndash; 21. DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2016.1109428.10.1080/07268602.2016.1109428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2019. Special issue on Indigenous languages: Introduction. Language 95(S1). e474–e478. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2019.0087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa. 2014. Integrating language documentation, language preservation, and linguistic research: Working with the Kokamas from the Amazon. Language Documentation & Conservation 8. 38–65. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4618.Google Scholar
Watahomigie, Lucille J., and Yamamoto, Akira Y.. 1992. Local reactions to language decline. Language 68(1). 10–17. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1992.0076.10.1353/lan.1992.0076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1992. Linguistic research under Aboriginal control: A personal account of fieldwork in central Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 12. 171–200. DOI: 10.1080/07268609208599475.10.1080/07268609208599475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Shawn. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Winnipeg: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2003. Defining documentary linguistics. Language Documentation and Description 1. 35–51. Online: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/006.Google Scholar
Yamada, Racquel. 2007. Collaborative linguistic fieldwork: Practical application of the empowerment model. Language Documentation & Conservation 1. 257–82. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/1717.Google Scholar