Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:11:38.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modulational instability in the beat-wave generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

D. Pesme ,
S. J. Karttunen ,
R. R. E. Salomaa ,
G. Laval  and
N. Silvestre
D. Pesme
Affiliation:
Centre de Physique Théorique, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France
S. J. Karttunen
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Laboratory, Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O.B. 169, SF-00181 Helsinki, Finland
R. R. E. Salomaa
Affiliation:
Department of Technical Physics, Helsinki University of Technology, SF-02150 Espoo, Finland
G. Laval
Affiliation:
Centre de Physique Théorique, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France
N. Silvestre
Affiliation:
Centre de Physique Théorique, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The coupling of a large amplitude plasmon, generated by the beat-wave process, to ion acoustic waves may lead to modulational or decay instabilities, which are investigated here. A general dispersion relation obtainable from Zakharov equations predicts large growth rates (∼ωpi) for short wavelength modulations. To avoid these, extremely short pulse lengths are required in the beat-wave experiments. Due to the very long wavelength of the beat-plasmon, the decay instability is not likely below the ke V-temperatures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 199 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cano, R., Fidone, I. & Zanfagna, B. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, C. E. et al. , 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, B. I., Kaufman, A. N. & Watson, K. M. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J. K. et al. 1974 Phys. Fluids 17, 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forslund, D. W. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkinen, J. A. & Karttunen, S. J. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, S. J. & Salomaa, R. R. E. 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, S. J. & Salomaa, R. R. E. 1987a IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. (to be published).Google Scholar
Karttunen, S. J. & Salomaa, R. R. E. 1987b Paper 18th European Conference on Interaction with Matter, Prague.Google Scholar
Pécseli, H. L. 1985 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS-13, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellat, R. 1982 Laser Plasma Interactions (eds. Balian, R. & Adam, J. C.), Les Houches 1980, Session XXXIV, North-Holland, p. 411–493.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, M. N. & Liu, C. S. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1972 Sov. Phys. JETP 35, 908.Google Scholar