Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T08:16:46.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Market Talk: Competition Policy in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Spencer Weber Waller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Spring 1997 , pp. 435 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Areeda, Philip, and Turner, Donald. 1978. Antitrust Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Baker, Jonathan B. 1989. Recent Developments in Economics That Challenge Chicago School Views. Antitrust Law Journal 58:645–55.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. 1990. Some Realism about Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment. Duke Law Journal 1990:375–430.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1978. The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York City: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bovard, James. 1991. The Fair Trade Fraud. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brinkley, Alan. 1995. The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Butler, Alison. 1990. A Methodological Approach to Chaos: Are Economists Missing the Point? Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis Review 72 (March–April): 36.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Dudley H. 1991. Molting Time for Antitrust: Market Realities, Economic Fallacies, and European Innovations. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 1986. Agon at Agora: Creative Misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition. Yale Law Journal 95:857–905.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 1991. First Amendment Antitrust: The End of Laissez Faire in Campaign Finance. Yale Law and Policy Review 9:236–78.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Lawrence A. 1994. From Random Walks to Chaotic Crashes: The Linear Genealogy of the Efficient Capital Market Hypothesis. George Washington Law Review 62:546–608.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Hunter M. 1991. The Development of New Zealand Competition Law. In Competition Law and Policy in New Zealand, ed. Adhar, Rex, 11–23. Sydney, Australia: Law Book.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1981. Predatory Strategies and Counterstrategies. University of Chicago Law Review 48:263–337.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1982. Is There a Ratchet in Antitrust? Texas Law Review 60:705–17.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. The Limits of Antitrust. Texas Law Review 63:1–87.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1989. Removing Intent and Cost in Predatory Pricing Cases: Power to Recoup as “Initial Hurdle.” Antitrust and Economics Law Review 21, no. 2:37–48.Google Scholar
Festa, Lawrence T. III. 1993. The Decline and Fall of the Chicago Empire? Notre Dame Law Review 68:619–72.Google Scholar
Fidler, David P. 1992. Competition Law and International Relations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 41:563–89.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1986. Free Speech and Social Structure. Iowa Law Review 71:1405–25.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1981. The Modernization of Antitrust: A New Equilibrium. Cornell Law Review 66:1140–92.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1986a. Consumers Beware Chicago. Michigan Law Review 84:1714–20.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1986b. Monopolization and Dominance in the United States and the European Community: Efficiency, Opportunity, and Fairness. Notre Dame Law Review 61:981–1020.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1986c. The Politics of Law and Economics in Judicial Decision Making: Antitrust as a Window. New York University Law Review 61:554–88.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1987. The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust. California Law Review 75:917–23.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1992. The End of Antitrust Isolationism: The Vision of One World. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1992:221–40.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1993. Antitrust, Trade, and the Twenty-First Century—Rounding the Circle. Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York 48:535–88.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1994. Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.—Information Failure as Soul or Hook? Antitrust Law Journal 62:759–67.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M. 1996. Antitrust, Competitiveness, and the World Arena: Efficiencies and Failing Firms in Perspective. Antitrust Law Journal 64:725–33.Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M., and Sullivan, Lawrence A.. 1987. Antitrust—Retrospective and Prospective: Where Are We Coming from? Where Are We Going? New York University Law Review 62:936–88.Google Scholar
Gleick, James. 1987. Chaos: The Making of a New Science. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. 1966. The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadler, Richard. 1965. What Happened to the Antitrust Movement? In The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver W. Jr. 1894. Privilege, Malice, and Intent. Harvard Law Review 8:1–14.Google Scholar
Ingbar, Stanley. 1984. The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth. Duke Law Journal 1984:1–91.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Michael S. 1994. The New Sophistication in Antitrust. Minnesota Law Review 79:1–53.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Michael S. 1995. An Essay on the Normative Foundations of Antitrust Economics. North Carolina Law Review 74:219–66.Google Scholar
Koller, Roland H. II. 1971. The Myth of Predatory Pricing: An Empirical Study. Antitrust Law and Economics Review 4, no. 4: 105.Google Scholar
Krattemaker, Thomas G., and Salop, Steven C.. 1986. Anticompetitive Exclusion: The Raising of Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power over Price. Yale Law Journal 86:209–93.Google Scholar
Lagasse, David R. 1996. Undue Influence: Corporate Political Speech, Power, and the Initiative Process. Brooklyn Law Review 61:1347–97.Google Scholar
Lande, Robert H. 1982. Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged. Hastings Law Journal 34:65–151.Google Scholar
Lande, Robert H. 1989. Chicago's False Foundation: Wealth Transfers (Not Just Efficiency) Should Guide Antitrust. Antitrust Law Journal 58:631–44.Google Scholar
Lande, Robert H. 1993. Chicago Takes It on the Chin: Imperfect Information Could Play a Crucial Role in the Post-Kodak World. Antitrust Law Journal 62:193–202.Google Scholar
McGee, John S. 1958. Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil N.J. Case. Journal of Law and Economics 1:137–69.Google Scholar
McGee, John S. 1980. Predatory Pricing Revisited. Journal of Law and Economics 23:289–330.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1987. Critical Perspectives to Labor and Antitrust Law. Paper presented at the Critical Legal Studies Conference, George Washington University School of Law.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1989. The Common Law, Labor, and Antitrust. Industrial Relations Law Journal 11:461–539.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1995a. Antitrust at Century's End. Southern Methodist University Law Review 48:1749–82.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1995b. Postmodern Legal Movements: Law and Jurisprudence at Century's End. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Neuborne, Burt. 1996. Pushing Free Speech Too Far. New York Times, 15 July 1996, A13.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1984. The Predicament of Antitrust Jurisprudence: Economics and the Monopolization of the Price Discrimination Argument. Duke Law Journal 1984:1205–95.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1989a. A Genealogy of Vertical Restraints Doctrine. Hastings Law Journal 40:511.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1989b. The “Rule of Reason” in Antitrust Law: Property Logic in Restraint of Competition. Hastings Law Journal 40:285–342.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1990a. A Counter-History of Antitrust Law. Duke Law Journal 1990:263.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1990b. Foreword: Antitrust as Public Interest Law. New York Law School Law Review 35:767–90.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1994. Three Visions of Managed Competition, 1920–1950. Antitrust Bulletin 39:273–87.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1996. History as Explanation. Annals of American Political Economy, Law, and Social Inquiry 21.Google Scholar
Pitofsky, Robert A. 1979. The Political Content of Antitrust. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127:1051 Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1979. The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127:925.Google Scholar
Price, Monroe E. 1994. The Market for Loyalties: Electronic Media and the Global Competition for Allegiances. Yale Law Journal 104:667–705.Google Scholar
Protos, Jill Dickey. 1993. Kodak v. Image Technical Services: A Setback for the Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis. Case Western Reserve Law Review 43:1199–1220.Google Scholar
Reuben, Richard C. 1992. Justices Give New Force to Sherman Act, Suit Allowed against Manufacturers by Service Organizations; “Chicago School” Rejected. Los Angeles Daily Journal, 9 June 1992, p. 1.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan. 1991. Chaos and the Court. Columbia Law Review 91:110–17.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. 1996. Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics. Harvard Law Review 109:641–68.Google Scholar
Ruhl, J. B. 1996. Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State. Duke Law Journal 1996:849–928.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin J. 1990. Sherman Antitrust Act Jurisprudence and Federal Policy-Making in the Formative Period, 1890–1914. New York Law School Law Review 35:791–826.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1977. Economics and More Humanistic Disciplines: What Are the Sources of Wisdom for Antitrust? University of Pennsylvania Law Review 125:1214–43.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1980. Antitrust, Microeconomics, and Politics: Reflections on Some Recent Relationships. California Law Review 80:1–12.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1982. Monopolization: Corporate Strategy, the IBM Cases, and the Transformation of the Law. Texas Law Review 60:587–647.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1987. The Viability of the Current Law on Horizontal Restraints. California Law Review 75:835–91.Google Scholar
Symposium on Post-Chicago Economics. 1995. Antitrust Law Journal 63:445–695.Google Scholar
Symposium on Post-Chicago Law and Economics. 1989. Chicago-Kent Law Review 65:3–191.Google Scholar
Thorelli, Hans B. 1954. The Federal Antitrust Policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. 1992a. The Failure of the Export Trading Company Program. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 19:239–76.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. 1992b. Understanding and Appreciating EC Competition Law. Antitrust Law Journal 61:55–77.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. 1994a. The Antitrust Philosophy of Justice Holmes. Southern Illinois University Law Journal 18:283–327.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. 1994b. The Modern Antitrust Relevance of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Brooklyn Law Review 59:1443–71.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. 1994c. Neo-Realism and the International Harmonization of Law: Lessons from Antitrust. University of Kansas Law Review 42:557–604.Google Scholar
Waller, Spencer Weber. Forthcoming. Prosecution by Regulation: The Changing Nature of Antitrust Enforcement.Google Scholar
White, Barbara A. 1991. Black and White Thinking in Grey Areas. George Washington Law Review 60:1–67.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. 1993. Fast Food and False Friends in the Shopping Mall of Ideas. University of Colorado Law Review 64:965–74.Google Scholar
Wise, Michael O. 1995. Antitrust's Newest “New Learning” Returns the Law to Its Roots: Chaos and Adaptation as New Metaphors for Competition Policy. Antitrust Bulletin 40:713–77.Google Scholar

Cases

Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990).Google Scholar
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993).Google Scholar
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-o-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
California Medical Association v. Federal Election Commission, 453 U.S. 182 (1981).Google Scholar
Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, 479 U.S. 104 (1986).Google Scholar
Citizens against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1991).Google Scholar
Colorado Republican Committee v. Federal Election Commission, 116 S.Ct. 2309 (1996).Google Scholar
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, 504 U.S. 451 (1992).Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. National Right to Work Committee, 459 U.S. 197 (1982).Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, 479 U.S. 238 (1986).Google Scholar
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978).Google Scholar
44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island, 116 S.Ct. 1495 (1996).Google Scholar
Iwatsu Elec. Co. v. United States, 758 F. Supp. 1506 (Ct. Int'l. Trade 1991).Google Scholar
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986).Google Scholar
Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillian, 506 U.S. 447 (1993).Google Scholar