Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-g5lq8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T00:17:21.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TYPICAL PROPERTIES OF LARGE RANDOM ECONOMIES WITH LINEAR ACTIVITIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2007

ANDREA DE MARTINO ,
MATTEO MARSILI  and
ISAAC PEREZ CASTILLO
ANDREA DE MARTINO
Affiliation:
CNR/INFM-SMC and Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
MATTEO MARSILI
Affiliation:
Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
ISAAC PEREZ CASTILLO
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the competitive equilibrium of large random economies with linear activities using methods of statistical mechanics. We focus on economies with C commodities, N firms, each running a randomly drawn linear technology, and one consumer. We derive, in the limit N, C ∞ with n=N/C fixed, a complete description of the statistical properties of typical equilibria. We find two regimes, which in the limit of efficient technologies are separated by a phase transition, and argue that endogenous technological change drives the economy close to the critical point.

Keywords

General equilibriumHeterogeneityThermodynamic limitReplica method

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 11 , Supplement S1: Interacting Agents and Market Behavior , November 2007 , pp. 34 - 61
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Axtell R.L. 2001 Zipf Distribution of U.S. firm sizes, Science 293, 1818.Google Scholar
Bak P. and K. Chen 1991 Self-organized criticality, Scientific American 264, 46– 53.Google Scholar
Berg J., M. Marsili, A. Rustichini, and R. Zecchina 2001 Statistical mechanics of asset markets with private information. Quantitative Finance 1, 203.Google Scholar
Challet D., M. Marsili, and R. Zecchina 2000 Statistical mechanics of heterogeneous agents: minority games. Physical Review Letters 84, 1824.Google Scholar
De Martino A., M. Marsili, and I. Pérez Castillo 2004 Statistical mechanics analysis of the equilibria of linear economies. Journal of Statistical Mechanics P04002.Google Scholar
Dosi G. 1998 Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy 11, 147– 162.Google Scholar
Durlauf S.N. 1999 How can statistical mechanics contribute to social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 10,582.Google Scholar
Foley D.K. 1994 A statistical equilibrium theory of markets. Journal of Economic Theory 62, 321.Google Scholar
Föllmer H. 1974 Random economies with many interacting agents. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 51.Google Scholar
Hertz J., A. Krogh and R.G. Palmer 1991 Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
Kirman A.P. 1992 Whom or what does the representative individual represent. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 117.Google Scholar
Lancaster K.J. 1966 A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74, 132.Google Scholar
Lancaster K.J. 1987 Mathematical Economics. New York: Dover.
Mezard M., and G. Parisi 1987 On the solution of the random link matching problems. Journal de Physique (France) 48, 1451.Google Scholar
Mezard M., G. Parisi, and M. Virasoro 1987 Spin Glass Theory and Beyond. Singapore: World Scientific.
Mezard M., G. Parisi, and R. Zecchina 2002 Analytic and algorithmic solution of random satisfiability problems. Science 297, 812.Google Scholar
Okuyama K., M. Takayasu, and H. Takayasu 1999 Zipf's law in income distribution of companies. Physica A 269, 125.Google Scholar
Romer P. 1990 Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S72– S102.Google Scholar
Talagrand M. 1998 Rigorous results for the Hopfield model with many patterns. Probability Theory and Related Fields 110, 177.Google Scholar
Talagrand M. 2003 The generalized Parisi formula. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 337, 111.Google Scholar
Wigner E.P. 1958 On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices. Annals of Mathematics 67, 325.Google Scholar