Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-bnl7t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:08:41.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Norwegian retroflexion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

Sverre Stausland Johnsen
Sverre Stausland Johnsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Postboks 1102 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway. stausland.johnsen@iln.uio.no
Get access

Abstract

A phonological process in Norwegian takes morpheme-initial alveolar /t d n s/ to retroflex [ʈ ɖ ɳ ʂ] after a morpheme ending in the tap /ɾ/, a process which earlier descriptions in the literature have classified as obligatory. This paper reports on production experiments with both existing and novel words, which show that Norwegian speakers treat retroflexion of morpheme-initial /s/ as optional, and that they are more likely to apply retroflexion to a morpheme in /s-/ when the /s/ is followed by a consonant (/sC-/) than when the /s/ is followed by a vowel (/sV-/).

Keywords

Norwegian retroflexiononset complexityvariation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , October 2012 , pp. 197 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aasen, Ivar. 1873. Norsk Ordbog med dansk Forklaring. Omarbeidet og forøget Udgave af en ældre „Ordbog over det norske Folkesprog“. Christiania: P. T. Mallings Boghandel.Google Scholar
Audacity Team. 2006. Audacity. Version 1.2.6. Computer software. http://sourceforge.net/projects/audacity/files/audacity/1.2.6/ (retrieved 21 August 2012).Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H[arald], Davidson, D[ouglas] J. & Bates, D[ouglas] M.. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4), 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin & Bolker, Ben. 2012. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. Version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (retrieved 23 August 2012).Google Scholar
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14 (2–3), 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekke, K[nud]. 1881. Bidrag til dansk-norskens lydlære. In Indbydelsesskrift til den offentlige examen i juni og juli 1881 ved Aars og Voss's latin- og realskole, 1–66. Kristiania: W. C. Fabritius.Google Scholar
Dardano, Maurizio & Trifone, Pietro. 1997. La nuova grammatica della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Draper, Norman R[ichard] & Smith, Harry. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd edn. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics). New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasson, Stig. 1986. Sandhi in Peninsular Scandinavian. In Andersen, Henning (ed.), Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 33), 271–300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil. 1974. On retroflex segments in Norwegian. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 28, 73–78.Google Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil. 1991. Fonetikk og fonologi. Ei elementær innføring, 2nd edn.Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Faraway, Julian J[ames]. 2005. Linear Models with R (Texts in Statistical Science). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Foldvik, Arne Kjell. 1974. Phonetic light on the Endresen–Fretheim controversy. Working Papers in Linguistics 6, 1–8. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Foldvik, Arne Kjell. 1977. Realisasjonen av r i norsk. Svenska landsmål och svensk folkliv 100, 110–118.Google Scholar
Foldvik, Arne Kjell. 1988a. Artikulasjonen av noen konsonantar i norsk. En palatografisk undersøkelse. In Bjørkum, Andreas & Borg, Arve (eds.), Nordiske studiar. Innlegg på den tredje norske dialektologkonferansen 1986 (Skrifter frå Norsk Målførearkiv XL), 359–362. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Foldvik, Arne Kjell. 1988b. Taxonomic problems in Norwegian phonetics. Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 10 (1), 189–195.Google Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein. 1969. Norwegian stress and quantity reconsidered. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 23, 76–96.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1948. Mere om r-bortfall i sørøstlandsk. Maal og Minne, 117–122.Google Scholar
Hilbe, Joseph M. 2009. Logistic Regression Models (Texts in Statistical Science). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 1969/1971. Transformasjonell generativ grammatikk. Annen utgave med øvelser (Scandinavian University Books). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Indrebø, Gustav. 1951. Norsk målsoga. Bergen: John Griegs boktrykkeri.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Ragnhild Lucy. 2006. An articulatory description of the liquids of Urban East Norwegian, based on EPG and EMA. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert. 2000. The Phonology of Norwegian (The Phonology of the World's Languages). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonell, A[rthur] A[nthony]. 1910. Vedic Grammar (Grundriss der indo-arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde I. Band, 4. Heft). Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Robustelli, Cecilia. 2007. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Moen, Inger & Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 2011. The Norwegian retroflex fricative. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS17), Department of Chinese, Translation & Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong. 1398–1401.Google Scholar
Moen, Inger, Simonsen, Hanne Gram, Lindstad, Arne Martinus & Cowen, Steve. 2003. The articulation of the East Norwegian apical liquids /ɭ ɾ ɽ/. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquín (eds.), The 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS15), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 1755–1758.Google Scholar
Nikiforov, Alexander. 2009. Skype Call Recorder. Version 0.7.2.1. Computer software. http://voipcallrecording.com/Skype_Call_Recorder (retrieved 21 August 2012).Google Scholar
Olsen, Eirik. 2011. R-bortfall og apikalisering i oslomålet. En studie av distribusjon og frekvenseffekter. Masteroppgave, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Computer software. Version 2.15.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rykkvin, Oddmund. 1946. Om r-bortfall i søraustlandsk. Maal og Minne (3–4), 144–150.Google Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne Gram & Moen, Inger. 2004. On the distinction between Norwegian /ʃ/ and /ç/ from a phonetic perspective. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 18 (6–8), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne Gram, Moen, Inger & Cowen, Steve. 2008. Norwegian retroflex stops in a cross linguistic perspective. Journal of Phonetics 36 (2), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skype (2003–2009). Version 4.0.0.206. Computer software. Skype Limited. http://www.oldapps.com/skype.php?old_skype=78 (retrieved 21 August 2012).Google Scholar
Standwell, G[raham] J. 1975. Norwegian phonology. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 23 (3–4), 339–377.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre. 2012. From perception to phonology: The emergence of perceptually motivated constraint rankings. Lingua 122 (2), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, Joh[an]. 1884. Norsk Lydskrift med Omrids af Fonetiken. Første Afsnit. Norvegia 1 (1), 19–132.Google Scholar
Torp, Arne. 2007. R – ei urokråke i språket. Oslo: Det norske samlaget.Google Scholar
Venables, W[illiam] N. & Ripley, B[rian] D[avid]. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. (Statistics and Computing). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, John M[artin]. 1970. A sketch of Norwegian phonology. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics: The International Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, 572–598. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar
Western, Aug[ust]. 1889. Kurze darstellung des norwegischen lautsystems. Phonetische Studien 2, 259–282.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. A Sanskrit Grammar: Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana, 2nd edn., revised and extended (Bibliothek indogermanischer Grammatiken 2). Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar