Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T23:25:51.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Why Bohm's Theory Solves the Measurement Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Tim Maudlin
Tim Maudlin*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abraham Stone recently has published an argument purporting to show that David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics fails to solve the measurement problem. Stone's analysis is not correct, as he has failed to take account of the conditions under which the theorems he cites are proven. An explicit presentation of a Bohmian measurement illustrates the flaw in his reasoning.

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 479 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, P.O. Box 270, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0270

References

Albert, D. (1992), Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, D.; Goldstein, S.; and Zanghi, N. (1992), “Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty”, Journal of Statistical Physics 67: 843–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. (1994), “Does the Bohm Theory Solve the Measurement Problem?”, Philosophy of Science 61: 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar